Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Chronic Pain
NCT ID: NCT04144972
Last Updated: 2025-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-24
2030-10-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Refractory Neuropathic Pain
NCT03029884
Project Relief: Developing Brain Stimulation as a Treatment for Chronic Pain
NCT04156802
Optimization of Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters in Patients With Medically Refractory Epilepsy
NCT05493722
Electrical Brain Stimulation to Reduce Epileptic Seizures
NCT00344877
Electrophysiological Recordings from Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes for Pain
NCT06019793
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Beginning with an inpatient trial period, subjects with various refractory chronic pain syndromes will undergo bilateral surgical implant of temporary electrodes in the thalamus, anterior cingulate, prefrontal cortex, insula and amygdala. These regions have been implicated in the multiple dimensions of pain. The goal of the trial period is to identify candidate biomarkers of pain and optimal stimulation parameters for each individual, and to select subjects who show likelihood to benefit from the trial. A subgroup of 6 such patients will then proceed to chronic implantation of up to 3 "optimal" brain regions for long-term recording and stimulation. The invstigators will first validate biomarkers of low- and high-pain states to define neural signals for pain prediction in individuals (Aim 1). The investigators will then use these pain biomarkers to develop personalized closed-loop algorithms for DBS and test the feasibility of performing closed-loop DBS for chronic pain in weekly blocks (Aim 2). Finally, the investigators will assess efficacy of closed-loop DBS algorithms against traditional open-loop DBS or sham in a double-blinded crossover trial (Aim 3) and measure mechanisms of DBS tolerance. Our main outcome measures will be a combination of pain, mood and functional scores together with quantitative sensory testing. Successful completion of this study would result in the first algorithms to predict real-time fluctuations in chronic pain states and development of a new therapy for currently untreatable diseases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active DBS
Chronic brain recordings and stimulation with bilateral implantations in pain-related brain regions. All participants will participate in active DBS, blinded to the participant.
Medtronic Summit RC+S or Percept RC
The investigators will perform DBS versus sham (randomized) to evaluate efficacy of stimulation for analgesia. Closed-loop DBS will be compared to open-loop DBS in a patient blinded, randomized fashion after initial, efficacy evaluation.
Inactive DBS
Non-active chronic brain stimulation in pain-related brain regions. brain recordings will remain active during this period. All participants will participate in inactive DBS, blinded to the participant.
Medtronic Summit RC+S or Percept RC
The investigators will perform DBS versus sham (randomized) to evaluate efficacy of stimulation for analgesia. Closed-loop DBS will be compared to open-loop DBS in a patient blinded, randomized fashion after initial, efficacy evaluation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medtronic Summit RC+S or Percept RC
The investigators will perform DBS versus sham (randomized) to evaluate efficacy of stimulation for analgesia. Closed-loop DBS will be compared to open-loop DBS in a patient blinded, randomized fashion after initial, efficacy evaluation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinical diagnosis of a refractory chronic pain syndrome including
1. post-traumatic pain syndromes (e.g. root avulsions, nerve crush injuries, spinal cord injury)
2. postsurgical pain syndromes (e.g., postmastectomy syndrome, post-thoracotomy syndrome, phantom limb pain, post-surgical spinal pain)
3. postherpetic neuralgia
4. complex regional pain syndrome
5. atypical facial pain
6. central pain syndromes (e.g. post-stroke pain, multiple sclerosis pain, post-radiation pain)
7. post-radiation plexopathy
3. Two or more years or more of medically refractory severe pain
4. Average daily pain for the past 30 days reported as \>6 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)
5. Pain that fluctuates over a range of at least 3 points on the NRS
6. Patient has failed at least two pain medications from different classes as determined by a neurologist or pain management specialist with stable doses of medications for 30 days prior to baseline visit.
7. Lack of a surgically correctible etiology for the pain as determined by 2 independent surgeons
8. Ability to speak / read English
9. Capable of understanding and providing informed consent
10. Absence of significant cognitive impairment - score of 25 or greater on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
11. Successful detection of pain biomarkers or positive symptomatic response to inpatient stimulation trial period if performed.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of cardiac pacemakers/defibrillators, implanted medication pumps, intra-cardiac lines, any intracranial implants (e.g., aneurysm clip, shunt, cochlear implant, electrodes) or other implanted stimulators not compatible with RC+S system
3. Pregnancy or breast feeding: all women of child bearing potential will have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to undergoing their surgical procedure.
4. Active depression (BDI \> 20), Suicide attempt \</= 12 months or imminent suicide risk, or other untreated or uncontrolled psychiatric illness that evaluating psychiatrist would recommend exclusion of patient after neuropsychiatric evaluation.
5. History of substance abuse in past 3 years
6. Inability to stop anticoagulation or platelet anti-aggregation therapy for surgery and recovery.
7. Implantable hardware not compatible with MRI or with the study.
8. MR abnormalities that suggest an alternative diagnosis or contraindicate surgery
9. Previous cranial ablative surgery.
10. Previous deep brain stimulation surgery using an RC+S incompatible system
11. Major neurological disorder other than the one that led to the chronic pain including epilepsy or a neurodegenerative condition including inability to recharge the device.
12. Requires diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
13. Allergies or known hypersensitivity to materials in the Summit RC+S system
14. Patients may be excluded from enrollment due to a condition that, in the judgment of the PI, significantly increases risk or reduces significantly the likelihood of benefit from DBS.
22 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, PhD
Associate Professor of Anesthesia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prasad Shirvalkar, M.D., Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Edward Chang, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Philip Starr, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-28757
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.