Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Chronic Pain

NCT ID: NCT04144972

Last Updated: 2025-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-24

Study Completion Date

2030-10-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic pain affects 1 in 4 US adults, and many cases are resistant to almost any treatment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) holds promise as a new option for patients suffering from treatment-resistant chronic pain, but traditional approaches target only brain regions involved in one aspect of the pain experience and provide continuous 24/7 brain stimulation which may lose effect over time. By developing new technology that targets multiple, complimentary brain regions in an adaptive fashion, the investigators will test a new therapy for chronic pain that has potential for better, more enduring analgesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A diverse array of chronic pain syndromes are refractory to almost all treatment but involve pathological activity in similar brain regions. This suggests therapeutic potential for deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory pain disorders, but despite early promise, long-term efficacy is lacking. Current DBS devices are limited in anatomical reach, targeting only a subset of the distinct brain regions known to be important. Further, DBS therapy is bluntly applied in an "open-loop," continuous fashion without regard to underlying physiology. As a result of these shortcomings, DBS for pain is often ineffective or shows diminished effect over time. Loss of therapeutic effect may be due to nervous system adaptation or a failure of stimulation to accommodate patient- specific dynamics of pain processing. DBS could be significantly improved by seeking individually optimized brain targets or by using neural biomarkers of pain to selectively control stimulation when it is needed ("closed-loop" DBS). Better brain targets would also address the different dimensions of pain such as somatosensory (location, intensity and duration), affective (mood and motivation) and cognitive (attention and memory). The main goal of this study is to test the feasibility of personalized targeting of brain regions that support multiple pain dimensions and to develop new technology for "closed-loop" DBS for pain. The study team will develop data-driven stimulation control algorithms to treat chronic pain using a novel device (Medtronic Summit RC+S or Percept RC) that allows longitudinal intracranial signal recording in an ambulatory setting. By building this technology in an implanted device, chronic pain DBS is tailored to each patient and will advance precision methods for DBS more generally.

Beginning with an inpatient trial period, subjects with various refractory chronic pain syndromes will undergo bilateral surgical implant of temporary electrodes in the thalamus, anterior cingulate, prefrontal cortex, insula and amygdala. These regions have been implicated in the multiple dimensions of pain. The goal of the trial period is to identify candidate biomarkers of pain and optimal stimulation parameters for each individual, and to select subjects who show likelihood to benefit from the trial. A subgroup of 6 such patients will then proceed to chronic implantation of up to 3 "optimal" brain regions for long-term recording and stimulation. The invstigators will first validate biomarkers of low- and high-pain states to define neural signals for pain prediction in individuals (Aim 1). The investigators will then use these pain biomarkers to develop personalized closed-loop algorithms for DBS and test the feasibility of performing closed-loop DBS for chronic pain in weekly blocks (Aim 2). Finally, the investigators will assess efficacy of closed-loop DBS algorithms against traditional open-loop DBS or sham in a double-blinded crossover trial (Aim 3) and measure mechanisms of DBS tolerance. Our main outcome measures will be a combination of pain, mood and functional scores together with quantitative sensory testing. Successful completion of this study would result in the first algorithms to predict real-time fluctuations in chronic pain states and development of a new therapy for currently untreatable diseases.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries Nerve Injury Pain, Postoperative Post Herpetic Neuralgia Complex Regional Pain Syndromes Post-Stroke Pain Post Radiation Brain Injury Post Radiation Plexopathy Nerve Root Avulsion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

All participants will participate in the Stage 0, in-clinic evaluation period to assess potential effectiveness of trial. A subset of those enrolled will proceed into the rest of the Stages (1-3).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
There will be assigned active intervention and non-active intervention periods for each patient throughout Phase 2 and 3 of the study. The participant will not know if he/she is in the active or non-active period of the phase.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active DBS

Chronic brain recordings and stimulation with bilateral implantations in pain-related brain regions. All participants will participate in active DBS, blinded to the participant.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Medtronic Summit RC+S or Percept RC

Intervention Type DEVICE

The investigators will perform DBS versus sham (randomized) to evaluate efficacy of stimulation for analgesia. Closed-loop DBS will be compared to open-loop DBS in a patient blinded, randomized fashion after initial, efficacy evaluation.

Inactive DBS

Non-active chronic brain stimulation in pain-related brain regions. brain recordings will remain active during this period. All participants will participate in inactive DBS, blinded to the participant.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Medtronic Summit RC+S or Percept RC

Intervention Type DEVICE

The investigators will perform DBS versus sham (randomized) to evaluate efficacy of stimulation for analgesia. Closed-loop DBS will be compared to open-loop DBS in a patient blinded, randomized fashion after initial, efficacy evaluation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medtronic Summit RC+S or Percept RC

The investigators will perform DBS versus sham (randomized) to evaluate efficacy of stimulation for analgesia. Closed-loop DBS will be compared to open-loop DBS in a patient blinded, randomized fashion after initial, efficacy evaluation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 22-80 years old
2. Clinical diagnosis of a refractory chronic pain syndrome including

1. post-traumatic pain syndromes (e.g. root avulsions, nerve crush injuries, spinal cord injury)
2. postsurgical pain syndromes (e.g., postmastectomy syndrome, post-thoracotomy syndrome, phantom limb pain, post-surgical spinal pain)
3. postherpetic neuralgia
4. complex regional pain syndrome
5. atypical facial pain
6. central pain syndromes (e.g. post-stroke pain, multiple sclerosis pain, post-radiation pain)
7. post-radiation plexopathy
3. Two or more years or more of medically refractory severe pain
4. Average daily pain for the past 30 days reported as \>6 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)
5. Pain that fluctuates over a range of at least 3 points on the NRS
6. Patient has failed at least two pain medications from different classes as determined by a neurologist or pain management specialist with stable doses of medications for 30 days prior to baseline visit.
7. Lack of a surgically correctible etiology for the pain as determined by 2 independent surgeons
8. Ability to speak / read English
9. Capable of understanding and providing informed consent
10. Absence of significant cognitive impairment - score of 25 or greater on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
11. Successful detection of pain biomarkers or positive symptomatic response to inpatient stimulation trial period if performed.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Major medical co-morbidities increasing the risk of surgery including uncontrolled hypertension, coagulopathy, severe diabetes, major organ system failure, active infection or history of implant related infections, immunocompromised state or malignancy with \< 5 years life expectancy
2. Presence of cardiac pacemakers/defibrillators, implanted medication pumps, intra-cardiac lines, any intracranial implants (e.g., aneurysm clip, shunt, cochlear implant, electrodes) or other implanted stimulators not compatible with RC+S system
3. Pregnancy or breast feeding: all women of child bearing potential will have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to undergoing their surgical procedure.
4. Active depression (BDI \> 20), Suicide attempt \</= 12 months or imminent suicide risk, or other untreated or uncontrolled psychiatric illness that evaluating psychiatrist would recommend exclusion of patient after neuropsychiatric evaluation.
5. History of substance abuse in past 3 years
6. Inability to stop anticoagulation or platelet anti-aggregation therapy for surgery and recovery.
7. Implantable hardware not compatible with MRI or with the study.
8. MR abnormalities that suggest an alternative diagnosis or contraindicate surgery
9. Previous cranial ablative surgery.
10. Previous deep brain stimulation surgery using an RC+S incompatible system
11. Major neurological disorder other than the one that led to the chronic pain including epilepsy or a neurodegenerative condition including inability to recharge the device.
12. Requires diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
13. Allergies or known hypersensitivity to materials in the Summit RC+S system
14. Patients may be excluded from enrollment due to a condition that, in the judgment of the PI, significantly increases risk or reduces significantly the likelihood of benefit from DBS.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, PhD

Associate Professor of Anesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Prasad Shirvalkar, M.D., Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Edward Chang, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Philip Starr, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Catherine Borror

Role: CONTACT

‪(415) 353-3494

Prasad Shirvalkar, M.D., Ph.D

Role: CONTACT

‪(415) 691-7587‬

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UH3NS115631

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

19-28757

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pulvinar Stimulation in Epilepsy: a Pilot Study
NCT04692701 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA