Non-invasive Personalized Transcranial Cortical Neurostimulation for Pain Relief
NCT ID: NCT06209645
Last Updated: 2024-04-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2029-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Surgically implanted motor cortex stimulation represents an invasive therapeutic solution capable of relieving a significant proportion of drug-resistant patients (1 in 2); it cannot, however, be offered to all patients, and is not morbidity-free.
Non-invasive motor cortex stimulation techniques have been refined over the last decade, in particular transcranial repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which provide pain relief among almost half of drug-resistant patients with few or no side effects.
To be efficient, cortical stimulation requires the activation of multiple distant networks involved in the cognitive and motivational response to pain; stimulation frequency is a crucial parameter for activating these mechanisms. The match between cortical stimulation frequency and the intrinsic neuronal frequency of the stimulated cortex has recently been suggested as a key determinant of clinical effect. Indeed, the transmission efficiency of an oscillatory network increases when its intrinsic frequency matches that of the stimulus applied to it. Given that human sensorimotor networks spontaneously oscillate at frequencies around 10 and 20 Hertz (Hz), this match could underlie the superior efficacy of transcranial stimulation at these frequencies.
The hypothesis of the study is that the analgesic effect of cortical stimulation will be enhanced if the stimulation frequency resonates with the spontaneous oscillations of the underlying cortex, thus facilitating its connectivity with the remote structures involved in pain control. The investigators propose to test this hypothesis in a population of patients with drug-resistant neuropathic pain, referred to the Pain Evaluation and Treatment Center (CETD) of the Neurological hospital, at the Hospices Civils de Lyon. The overall aim of the project is to compare the efficacy of stimulation at each individual's own rate of oscillation of the motor cortex, against a "classic" stimulation protocol, and against placebo stimulation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cortical Stimulation by Direct Current for the Treatment of Chronic Pain : Pilot-study of a Stimulation Device at Home
NCT02346396
Efficacy of Cortex Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain
NCT00224666
Modulating Neuropathic Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
NCT04581525
Pilot Study of Transcranial Stimulation (tDCS)to Relieve Neuropathic Pain in Cancer Patients
NCT01948050
Project Relief: Developing Brain Stimulation as a Treatment for Chronic Pain
NCT04156802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
The stimulation (tACS) will be compared head-to-head with another reference active stimulation modality, namely anodal direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the motor cortex. The 2 types of active stimulation will be performed in cross-over mode, in randomized order, and compared with placebo stimulation.
Each stimulation modality will comprise 6 sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, with the first session in placebo mode and the next 5 in active mode.
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
tDCS then tACS
This group is made up of adult patients with drug-resistant neuropathic pain, who started with tDCS stimulation, followed by tACS stimulation, in accordance with randomization. Each series of each modality comprises 6 sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, the first session being in placebo mode and the following 5 in active mode. Each session lasts 20 minutes. In placebo mode, a 2 miliampere (mA) current is delivered for 30 seconds at the start and at the end of the session, to prevent the patient noticing the difference between placebo and active stimulation. In active mode, the 2mA current is delivered for the duration of the session.
tDCS (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation)
The tDCS group will be treated with non-invasive motor cortex stimulation. A two-minute EEG recording will be made before each session, using the same electrodes as for stimulation. Anodal stimulation of 2,0 mA will be delivered over the motor area contralateral to the painful region (C4 or C3 according to the international 10-20 system). The return electrode will be placed over the fronto-polar region (FP1 or FP2) ipsilateral to the painful region. If pain is bilateral, the most painful region will be chosen to be treated.
tACS (Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation)
The tACS group will be treated with non-invasive motor cortex stimulation. The stimulation series comprises six sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, the first session being placebo. A two-minute EEG recording will be made before each session, using the same electrodes as for stimulation. Stimulation frequency will be set according to the dominant frequency recorded over the motor area. Anodal stimulation of 2,0 mA will be delivered over the motor area contralateral to the painful region (C4 or C3 according to the international 10-20 system). The return electrode will be placed over the fronto-polar region (FP1 or FP2) ipsilateral to the painful region.
tACS then tDCS
This group is made up of adult patients with drug-resistant neuropathic pain, who started with tACS stimulation, followed by tDCS stimulation, in accordance with randomization. Each series of each modality comprises 6 sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, the first session being in placebo mode and the following 5 in active mode. Each session lasts 20 minutes. In placebo mode, a 2mA current is delivered for 30 seconds at the start and at the end of the session, to prevent the patient noticing the difference between placebo and active stimulation. In active mode, the 2mA current is delivered for the duration of the session.
tDCS (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation)
The tDCS group will be treated with non-invasive motor cortex stimulation. A two-minute EEG recording will be made before each session, using the same electrodes as for stimulation. Anodal stimulation of 2,0 mA will be delivered over the motor area contralateral to the painful region (C4 or C3 according to the international 10-20 system). The return electrode will be placed over the fronto-polar region (FP1 or FP2) ipsilateral to the painful region. If pain is bilateral, the most painful region will be chosen to be treated.
tACS (Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation)
The tACS group will be treated with non-invasive motor cortex stimulation. The stimulation series comprises six sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, the first session being placebo. A two-minute EEG recording will be made before each session, using the same electrodes as for stimulation. Stimulation frequency will be set according to the dominant frequency recorded over the motor area. Anodal stimulation of 2,0 mA will be delivered over the motor area contralateral to the painful region (C4 or C3 according to the international 10-20 system). The return electrode will be placed over the fronto-polar region (FP1 or FP2) ipsilateral to the painful region.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tDCS (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation)
The tDCS group will be treated with non-invasive motor cortex stimulation. A two-minute EEG recording will be made before each session, using the same electrodes as for stimulation. Anodal stimulation of 2,0 mA will be delivered over the motor area contralateral to the painful region (C4 or C3 according to the international 10-20 system). The return electrode will be placed over the fronto-polar region (FP1 or FP2) ipsilateral to the painful region. If pain is bilateral, the most painful region will be chosen to be treated.
tACS (Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation)
The tACS group will be treated with non-invasive motor cortex stimulation. The stimulation series comprises six sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, the first session being placebo. A two-minute EEG recording will be made before each session, using the same electrodes as for stimulation. Stimulation frequency will be set according to the dominant frequency recorded over the motor area. Anodal stimulation of 2,0 mA will be delivered over the motor area contralateral to the painful region (C4 or C3 according to the international 10-20 system). The return electrode will be placed over the fronto-polar region (FP1 or FP2) ipsilateral to the painful region.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Neuropathic pain of more than one year's duration1
* Failed treatment with tricyclic or tetracyclic antidepressants, antiepileptics and a combination of morphine and a serotonin (5HT) norepinephrine (NA2) reuptake inhibitor, in the absence of contraindication.
* Average pain intensity of at least 4/10 in the month preceding the inclusion visit.
* Recipient or beneficiary of a social security scheme-
Exclusion Criteria
* Active epilepsy, treated or not
* Unhealed scalp wound adjacent to EEG recording electrodes or transcranial stimulation application (contraindication to Medical Device (DM) use)
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Inability to understand or follow the ins and outs of the study, in particular the need to assess pain intensity on a daily basis or to trace it, possibly with the help of a third party (comprehension or communication disorders).
* People under guardianship, curatorship or legal protection
* Persons deprived of their liberty, persons under psychiatric care and persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than clinical investigation
* Participation in other research interfering with the present study.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charbel SALAMEH, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Integration of pain lab (NeuroPain); Lyon Neurocience research center
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
69HCL23_0810
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.