Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Refractory Neuropathic Pain

NCT ID: NCT03029884

Last Updated: 2026-02-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-28

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) holds promise as a new option for patients suffering from treatment-resistant chronic pain, but current technology is unable to reliably achieve long-term pain symptom relief. A "one-size-fits-all" approach of continuous, 24/7 brain stimulation has helped patients with some movement disorders, but the key to reducing pain may be the activation of stimulation only when needed, as this may help keep the brain from adapting to stimulation effects. By expanding the technological capabilities of an investigative brain stimulation device, the investigators will enable the delivery of stimulation only when pain signals in the brain are high, and then test whether this more personalized stimulation leads to reliable symptom relief for chronic pain patients over extended periods of time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Many pain syndromes are notoriously refractory to almost all treatment and pose significant costs to patients and society. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory pain disorders showed early promise but demonstration of long-term efficacy is lacking. Current DBS devices provide "open-loop" continuous stimulation and thus are prone to loss of effect owing to nervous system adaptation and a failure to accommodate natural fluctuations in chronic pain states. DBS could be significantly improved if neural biomarkers for relevant disease states could be used as feedback signals in "closed-loop" DBS algorithms that would selectively provide stimulation when it is needed. This approach may help avert the development of tolerance over time and enable the dynamic features of chronic pain to be targeted in a personalized fashion.

Optimizing the brain targets for both biomarker detection and stimulation delivery may also markedly impact efficacy. Recent imaging studies in humans point to the key role of frontal cortical regions in supporting the affective and cognitive dimensions of pain, which may be more effective DBS targets than previous targets involved in basic somatosensory processing. Pathological activity in the anterior cingulate (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is correlated with the higher-order processing of pain, and recent clinical trials have identified ACC as a promising stimulation target for the neuromodulation of pain. In this study, the investigators will target ACC and OFC for biomarker discovery and closed-loop stimulation. The investigators will develop data-driven stimulation control algorithms to treat chronic pain using a novel neural interface device (Medtronic Activa PC+S) that allows longitudinal intracranial signal recording in an ambulatory setting. By building and validating this technological capacity in an implanted device, the investigators will empower DBS for chronic pain indications and advance personalized, precision methods for DBS more generally.

This study will enroll ten patients with post-stroke pain, phantom limb syndrome and spinal cord injury pain in our three-phase clinical trial. The investigators will first identify biomarkers of low and high pain states to define optimal neural signals for pain prediction in individuals (Aim 1). These pain biomarkers will then be used to develop closed-loop algorithms for DBS and test the feasibility and efficacy of performing closed-loop DBS for chronic pain in a single-blinded, sham controlled clinical trial (Aim 2). Our main outcome measures will be a combination of pain, mood and functional scores together with quantitative sensory testing. In the last phase, the investigators will assess the efficacy of closed-loop DBS algorithms against traditional open-loop DBS (Aim 3) and assess mechanisms of DBS tolerance in response to chronic stimulation. Successful completion of this study would result in the first algorithms to predict real-time fluctuations in chronic pain states for the delivery of analgesic stimulation and would prove the feasibility of closed-loop DBS for pain-relief by advancing implantable device technology.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain Post Stroke Pain Phantom Limb Pain Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

All participants (phantom limb and thalamic pain) will participate in the same three phase study to test open-loop DBS vs closed-loop DBS vs Sham DBS
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
There will be assigned active intervention and non-active intervention periods for each patient throughout phase 2 and 3 of the study. The participant will not know if he/she is in the active or non-active period of the phase.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sham DBS

Chronic brain recording and stimulation with unilateral or bilateral implantation in pain-related brain regions. Both thalamic pain syndrome and phantom pain participants will participate in sham, open-loop and closed-loop DBS, blinded to the participant.

Open Loop involves tonic stimulation of ACC of OFC brain region. During closed-loop DBS sessions, stimulation will be delivered in response to identified personalized, brain biomarkers of chronic pain.Sham involves no active stimulation - brain recordings will remain active with no active stimulation. Because more than 6 sequences were used, only 1 "Arm/Group" is defined.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sham Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

No Active Stimulation

Open-Loop DBS and Closed-Loop DBS

Chronic brain recording and stimulation with unilateral or bilateral implantation in pain-related brain regions. Both thalamic pain syndrome and phantom pain participants will participate in sham, open-loop and closed-loop DBS, blinded to the participant.

Open Loop involves tonic stimulation of ACC of OFC brain region. During closed-loop DBS sessions, stimulation will be delivered in response to identified personalized, brain biomarkers of chronic pain.Sham involves no active stimulation - brain recordings will remain active with no active stimulation. Because more than 6 sequences were used, only 1 "Arm/Group" is defined.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Open-Loop DBS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional brain stimulation that is tonically providing stimulation, without feedback

Closed-Loop DBS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Feedback enabled brain stimulation, where stimulation is provided on demand in response to pain biomarkers.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Open-Loop DBS

Conventional brain stimulation that is tonically providing stimulation, without feedback

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Stimulation

No Active Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closed-Loop DBS

Feedback enabled brain stimulation, where stimulation is provided on demand in response to pain biomarkers.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 21 years
* Clinical diagnosis of post-stroke pain (thalamic pain), spinal cord injury or phantom limb pain with allodynia or dysesthesia with pinprick anesthesia or hypoesthesia on the affected hemibody or limb (anesthesia dolorosa).
* For Post-Stroke Pain: Stroke of ischemic etiology only. MRI done within one year of the first visit showing a lesion that involves the contralateral brainstem, thalamus or cortex. The lesion will involve cortical-subcortical areas in topography consistent with sensory thalamocortical connections. This will include patients with infarcts in the territory of the middle cerebral artery or those with cavernous malformations. A more recent MRI may be required if the patient's condition changed within the previous year.
* For Phantom limb pain: MRI done within one year not showing any contraindication to surgery such as mass, lesion, hemorrhage or other abnormality near target
* For Spinal Cord Injury pain: MRI done within one year not showing contraindication to surgery such as mass, lesion, hemorrhage or other abnormality near target
* One year or more of medically refractory severe pain (see below)
* Average daily pain for the past 30 days reported as \>5 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)
* Failure to respond adequately to at least one antidepressant, one anti-seizure medication and one oral narcotic with current stable doses of medications.
* Ability to speak / read English
* Capable of understanding and providing informed consent
* Stable doses of pain medications (e.g. anticonvulsant drug, anti-depressants, and opioids etc.)
* Women of childbearing age must be on regular use of an accepted contraceptive method(s).

Exclusion Criteria

* Study subjects will be adults with refractory chronic neuropathic pain.
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Inability to speak and / or read English
* Inability to give informed consent
* Significant cognitive impairment or Dementia (MoCA \< 25)
* Aphasia severe enough to limit the consent process or communication between the investigators and the patient. Patients with mild or recovering aphasia may be considered candidates at the discretion of the PI.
* Active depression (BDI \> 20) or other untreated or uncontrolled psychiatric illness (active general anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), or personality disorders (e.g. multiple personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, etc.) or other neuropsychiatric conditions that evaluating psychiatrist would recommend exclusion of patient after neuropsychiatric evaluation.
* Suicide attempt \</= 12 months or imminent suicide risk
* History of substance abuse in past 3 years.
* Major medical co-morbidities increasing the risk of surgery including uncontrolled hypertension, severe diabetes, major organ system failure, history of hemorrhagic stroke, need for chronic anticoagulation other than aspirin, active infection, immunocompromised state or malignancy with \< 5 years life expectancy
* Inability to stop Coumadin or platelet anti-aggregation therapy for surgery and after surgery. Patients taking these medications will need to discuss the need/risk of continuing these medications with their physicians and the PI or study personnel may contact the treating physician(s) as well to discuss the risks of anticoagulation / antiaggregation therapy discontinuation.
* Coagulopathy. Patients will be excluded unless assessed and cleared by hematology.
* MRI (done within one year of the first visit) with significant abnormalities other than those associated with the neurological disorder causing chronic pain.
* Implantable hardware not compatible with MRI or with the study.
* Inability to comply with study follow-up visits
* Previous ablative intracranial surgery for the management of the thalamic pain syndrome.
* Previously implanted with deep brain stimulation system or any previously implanted device treatment involving brain stimulation
* Major neurological disorder other than the one that led to the chronic pain including epilepsy, neurodegenerative condition or any history of seizure
* Requires diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to treat a chronic condition
* Has an implanted electronic device such as a neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker or medication pump
* Allergies or known hypersensitivity to materials in the Activa PC+S system (i.e. titanium, polyurethane, silicone, polyetherimide, stainless steel).
* Pregnancy or lack of regular use of contraceptives. Patients who become pregnant after enrollment may be excluded from the study. Patients who become pregnant prior to the surgical implantation of the DBS systems will be excluded from the study.
* Patients may be excluded from enrollment due to a condition that, in the judgment of the PI, significantly increases risk or reduces significantly the likelihood of benefit from DBS.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Department of Defense

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, PhD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, PhD

Associate Professor of Neurological Surgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward Chang, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Prasad Shirvalkar, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UH3NS109556

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

16-18617

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LIFU for Chronic Pain
NCT06628180 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA