Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Neuroprotection in Acute Stroke
NCT ID: NCT03574038
Last Updated: 2023-06-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-28
2022-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
NCT04801446
Comparing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Montages in Stroke
NCT04340973
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-stroke Fatigue
NCT05816603
Optimizing Current and Electrode Montage for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Patients
NCT02763826
Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Treat Epilepsy
NCT05673915
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage will determine the pace of the escalation through the dose tiers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Patients will be randomized to active treatment (C-tDCS) vs sham stimulation in a 3:1 ratio. There will be 6 dose tiers, reflecting increasing intensity and duration of stimulation: Tier 1 - 1 mA, single 20 - min cycle; Tier 2- 2 mA, single 20 min cycle; Tier 3 - 1 mA, 2 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 4- 2 mA, 2 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 5 - 1 mA, 3 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 6 - 2 mA, 3 cycles of 20 min/20 min off.
Sham Stimulation
Sham Stimulation
Sham Stimulation
Patients will be randomized to active treatment (C-tDCS) vs sham stimulation in a 3:1 ratio. Patients in the sham stimulation arm at all the tiers will have the cap and electrodes in place, and sham switch moved but without prolonged delivery of electrical stimulation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Patients will be randomized to active treatment (C-tDCS) vs sham stimulation in a 3:1 ratio. There will be 6 dose tiers, reflecting increasing intensity and duration of stimulation: Tier 1 - 1 mA, single 20 - min cycle; Tier 2- 2 mA, single 20 min cycle; Tier 3 - 1 mA, 2 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 4- 2 mA, 2 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 5 - 1 mA, 3 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 6 - 2 mA, 3 cycles of 20 min/20 min off.
Sham Stimulation
Patients will be randomized to active treatment (C-tDCS) vs sham stimulation in a 3:1 ratio. Patients in the sham stimulation arm at all the tiers will have the cap and electrodes in place, and sham switch moved but without prolonged delivery of electrical stimulation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. NIHSS≥4 or NIHSS \<4 in the presence of disabling deficits
3. Age\>18;
4. Presence of any cortical vessel occlusion including ICA, branches of MCA, Anterior Cerebral artery (ACA), Posterior Cerebral artery (PCA), Posterior-Inferior cerebellar artery (PICA);
5. Presence of salvageable penumbra with Tmax\> 6 sec/ ischemic core volume (ADC \< 620 μm2/s or rCBF\< 30%) ≥ 1.2
6. Patient ineligible for IV tPA, per national AHA/ASA Guidelines
7. Patient ineligible for endovascular therapy per AHA/ASA national Guidelines - one or more of: poor prestroke functional status (mRS score \>1), mild neurological symptoms (NIHSS \<6), large ischemic core (ASPECTS \<6), thrombectomy not technically performable due to severe vessel tortuosity, cervical artery chronic occlusion, or other unfavorable angioarchitectural features that preclude endovascular access to the target intracranial vessel. 8) Subject is able to be treated with tDCS within 24 hours of last known well time;
9\) A signed informed consent is obtained from the patient or patient's legally authorized representative
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of a large Ischemic core volume (ADC \< 620 μm2/s or rCBF\< 30%) ≥ 100
3. Presence of tDCS contraindications - electrically or magnetically activated intracranial metal and non-metal implants.
4. Severe MR contrast allergy or renal dysfunction with eGFR\<30ml/min, precluding MRI gadolinium or CT iodine contrast
5. Pregnancy
6. Signs or symptoms of acute myocardial infarction, including EKG findings, on admission
7. Suspicion of aortic dissection on admission
8. History of seizure disorder or new seizures with presentation of current stroke
9. Evidence of any other major life-threatening or serious medical condition that would prevent completion of the study protocol including attendance at the 3-month follow-up visit
10. Concomitant experimental therapy
11. Preexisting scalp lesion at the site of the stimulation or presence of skull defects (may alter current flow pattern)
12. Preexisting coagulopathy, consist of platelet count of ≤ 100, INR ≥ 3, PTT ≥ 90.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mersedeh Bahr Hosseini, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mersedeh Bahr Hosseini, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California- Los Angeles (UCLA)
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bahr-Hosseini M, Nael K, Unal G, Iacoboni M, Liebeskind DS, Bikson M, Saver JL; TESSERACT Trial Group. High-definition Cathodal Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2319231. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19231.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-000421
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.