Optimizing Current and Electrode Montage for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT02763826

Last Updated: 2021-10-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-08

Study Completion Date

2019-04-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) amplitude and electrode montage that is both safe and efficacious

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate cortical excitability of targeted brain regions. Various studies have investigated tDCS use in stroke patients with motor impairments (cumulatively about 200 cases). Although these studies are mostly "proof of concept" with small sample size, they do suggest that tDCS may improve motor function. However these two questions have not been addressed systematically:

1. What is the optimal current for stroke patients?
2. What is the optimal tDCS electrode montage for stimulation?

This proposal lays the scientific foundation for systematic application of tDCS in stroke recovery research by progressively increasing tDCS currents and montages that are both safe and efficacious in population with stroke.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Determine the Optimal tDCS current

We will invesitigate the optimal curent in range of 1 mA to 4 mA. We hypothesize that 4 mA is tolerable, safe and can induce the highest level of cortical excitability in the lesional motor cortex.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

brain stimulation using progressively increasing amounts of direct currents and in a variety of electrode montages

Determine the optimal tDCS electrode montage

We hypothesize that the bi-hemispheric stimulation with anodal stimulation on the lesional hemisphere and simultaneous cathodal stimulation on the non-lesional hemisphere induces more cortical excitability in the lesional hemisphere than either anodal stimulation on the affected hemisphere or cathodal stimulation on non-lesional hemisphere alone.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

brain stimulation using progressively increasing amounts of direct currents and in a variety of electrode montages

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

transcranial direct current stimulation

brain stimulation using progressively increasing amounts of direct currents and in a variety of electrode montages

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

tdcs

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-80 years old with a first-ever ischemic stroke that occurred at least 6 months ago;
* Finished rehabilitation therapy(including inpatient or outpatient Physical Therapy (PT) / Occupational Therapy (OT) / Speech Therapy (SP)) at least one month ago;
* Unilateral limb weakness with Fugl Meyer-Upper Extremity Scale score less than 56 (out of 66);
* Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) is inducible on abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle on the affected side by TMS.

Exclusion Criteria

* Primary intracerebral hematoma, or subarachnoid hemorrhage,
* Bihemispheric ischemic strokes;
* History of prior stroke or old infarct demonstrated on the CT or MRI or documented in medical records;
* Other concomitant neurological disorders affecting upper extremity motor function;
* Documented history of dementia before or after stroke;
* Documented history of uncontrolled depression or psychiatric disorder either before or after stroke which could affect their ability to participate in the experiment;
* Uncontrolled hypertension despite treatment, specifically Systolic blood pressure (SBP)/ Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) \>= 180/100 mmHg at baseline;
* Presence of any MRI/tDCS/TMS risk factors: a) an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated metal or nonmetal implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system; b) non-fixed metal in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to eye; c) pregnancy, since the effect of tDCS on the fetus is unknown; d) history of seizure disorder or post-stroke seizure; e) preexisting scalp lesion, bone defect or hemicraniectomy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wuwei Feng, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chhatbar PY, Chen R, Deardorff R, Dellenbach B, Kautz SA, George MS, Feng W. Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study. Brain Stimul. 2017 May-Jun;10(3):553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28279641 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00022248

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id