Optimizing Current and Electrode Montage for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT02763826
Last Updated: 2021-10-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-08
2019-04-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. What is the optimal current for stroke patients?
2. What is the optimal tDCS electrode montage for stimulation?
This proposal lays the scientific foundation for systematic application of tDCS in stroke recovery research by progressively increasing tDCS currents and montages that are both safe and efficacious in population with stroke.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Determine the Optimal tDCS current
We will invesitigate the optimal curent in range of 1 mA to 4 mA. We hypothesize that 4 mA is tolerable, safe and can induce the highest level of cortical excitability in the lesional motor cortex.
transcranial direct current stimulation
brain stimulation using progressively increasing amounts of direct currents and in a variety of electrode montages
Determine the optimal tDCS electrode montage
We hypothesize that the bi-hemispheric stimulation with anodal stimulation on the lesional hemisphere and simultaneous cathodal stimulation on the non-lesional hemisphere induces more cortical excitability in the lesional hemisphere than either anodal stimulation on the affected hemisphere or cathodal stimulation on non-lesional hemisphere alone.
transcranial direct current stimulation
brain stimulation using progressively increasing amounts of direct currents and in a variety of electrode montages
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
transcranial direct current stimulation
brain stimulation using progressively increasing amounts of direct currents and in a variety of electrode montages
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Finished rehabilitation therapy(including inpatient or outpatient Physical Therapy (PT) / Occupational Therapy (OT) / Speech Therapy (SP)) at least one month ago;
* Unilateral limb weakness with Fugl Meyer-Upper Extremity Scale score less than 56 (out of 66);
* Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) is inducible on abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle on the affected side by TMS.
Exclusion Criteria
* Bihemispheric ischemic strokes;
* History of prior stroke or old infarct demonstrated on the CT or MRI or documented in medical records;
* Other concomitant neurological disorders affecting upper extremity motor function;
* Documented history of dementia before or after stroke;
* Documented history of uncontrolled depression or psychiatric disorder either before or after stroke which could affect their ability to participate in the experiment;
* Uncontrolled hypertension despite treatment, specifically Systolic blood pressure (SBP)/ Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) \>= 180/100 mmHg at baseline;
* Presence of any MRI/tDCS/TMS risk factors: a) an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated metal or nonmetal implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system; b) non-fixed metal in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to eye; c) pregnancy, since the effect of tDCS on the fetus is unknown; d) history of seizure disorder or post-stroke seizure; e) preexisting scalp lesion, bone defect or hemicraniectomy.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wuwei Feng, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chhatbar PY, Chen R, Deardorff R, Dellenbach B, Kautz SA, George MS, Feng W. Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study. Brain Stimul. 2017 May-Jun;10(3):553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00022248
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id