The Relationship Between Dual-task Gait Performance, Physical Activity Levels, Sleep and Aging in Healthy Adults
NCT ID: NCT04144647
Last Updated: 2020-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-25
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Dual-task Exercises on Gait Parameters and Cognitive Function in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02185157
Neurophysiological Changes After Perturbation-based Training in Older Adults
NCT06573658
Effect of Observation Plus Imagination of Gait on Stride Variability in Young and Older Adults
NCT02120144
Effects of Single-task Versus Dual-task Training on balancePERFORMANCE
NCT03608111
Cognitive Training and Dual-task Ability
NCT01895608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The proposed study aims to investigate, in healthy adults aged between 18-80 years old, a) the effect of combining functional gait tasks with different types of dual-tasks and cognitive task categories on total Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) score (primary task), and task prioritisation; b) the relationship between FGA single and dual task performance, age, sleep and PA levels; c) the relationship between age, balance confidence, psychological symptoms and sleep with functional gait single and dual task performance, cognitive function, quality of life and PA levels.
Principle Research Questions:
* What is the effect of dual-task type and/or cognitive task category on FGA performance (primary task), gait speed and task prioritisation?
* What is the relationship between age, balance confidence, psychological symptoms, quality of life and sleep with FGA single and dual task performance, cognitive function and PA levels in healthy adults?
Hypothesis:
1. Cognitive dual tasks will affect performance of the primary FGA task, gait speed and task prioritisation more than an auditory dual task.
2. A more sedentary lifestyle, increasing age, poorer sleep state, balance confidence and/or lower (i.e. poorer performance) cognitive function test scores will affect performance on FGA dual task performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
All individuals that express interest in this study, will be provided with a Participant Information Sheet (PIS) either by email or hard copy by post.
All prospective subjects will be screened for matching of inclusion criteria. After a potential participant contacts the PhD student, Ms Viktoria Azoidou, regarding his/her interest in participating in the study, the person will be asked to complete the screening questionnaire via telephone or email as per each individual's preference regarding eligibility criteria. If after screening, a potential participant meets the eligibility criteria, an appointment will be arranged to discuss any concerns or answer any questions participants may have regarding the PIS, then sign the written consent form and be assessed attend the research laboratory for the single testing session.
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy adults 18-80 years old
Healthy adults 18-80 years old
Single testing session
All participants that meet the inclusion criteria, will have to attend the research laboratory at Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Shepherd's House, Guy's Campus, King's College London, SE1 1UL to be assessed in a single testing session.
The testing session will require them to complete some questionnaires regarding balance confidence, psychological state, sleep and physical function and to undertake some simple tests of cognitive function. They will also undertake a brief dynamic balance assessment and the dual-task gait test. The dual-task component involves two cognitive tasks (a numeracy and a literacy task) or auditory task. The gait test will be performed separately and then together with each of two cognitive tasks or auditory task.
On the day, after the testing, each participant will, also, be provided a physical activity monitor (accelerometer-AX3) to wear on their wrist for 24 hours a day, seven days a week without taking it off.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Single testing session
All participants that meet the inclusion criteria, will have to attend the research laboratory at Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Shepherd's House, Guy's Campus, King's College London, SE1 1UL to be assessed in a single testing session.
The testing session will require them to complete some questionnaires regarding balance confidence, psychological state, sleep and physical function and to undertake some simple tests of cognitive function. They will also undertake a brief dynamic balance assessment and the dual-task gait test. The dual-task component involves two cognitive tasks (a numeracy and a literacy task) or auditory task. The gait test will be performed separately and then together with each of two cognitive tasks or auditory task.
On the day, after the testing, each participant will, also, be provided a physical activity monitor (accelerometer-AX3) to wear on their wrist for 24 hours a day, seven days a week without taking it off.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged 18-80 years old
* independently mobile.
Exclusion Criteria
* individuals with lack of a good grasp of written and spoken English language.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King's College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Viktoria Azoidou
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King's College London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lacour M, Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M. Posture control, aging, and attention resources: models and posture-analysis methods. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Dec;38(6):411-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002 Aug;16(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00156-4.
Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):329-42; quiz 472. doi: 10.1002/mds.21720.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.
Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2004 Oct;84(10):906-18.
Marchetti GF, Lin CC, Alghadir A, Whitney SL. Responsiveness and minimal detectable change of the dynamic gait index and functional gait index in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;38(2):119-24. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000015.
Wrisley DM, Kumar NA. Functional gait assessment: concurrent, discriminative, and predictive validity in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 2010 May;90(5):761-73. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090069. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
Godi M, Franchignoni F, Caligari M, Giordano A, Turcato AM, Nardone A. Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders. Phys Ther. 2013 Feb;93(2):158-67. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120171. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM. Utility of the Mini-BESTest, BESTest, and BESTest sections for balance assessments in individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Jun;35(2):90-7. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31821a620c.
King L, Horak F. On the mini-BESTest: scoring and the reporting of total scores. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):571-5. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2013.93.4.571. No abstract available.
Cambridge-Cognition-Limited. CANTABeclipse™: Test Administration Guide Manual. 3rd ed. Cambridge 2015.
Egerhazi A, Berecz R, Bartok E, Degrell I. Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Apr 13;31(3):746-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.01.011. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
Fowler KS, Saling MM, Conway EL, Semple JM, Louis WJ. Paired associate performance in the early detection of DAT. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Jan;8(1):58-71.
Bamiou DE, Iliadou VV, Zanchetta S, Spyridakou C. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires? J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(10):824-37. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15009.
British Society of Audiology. Standard pure tone audiometry. British Society of Audiology-BSA 2017.
British Society of Audiology. Standard pure tone audiometry. British Society of Audiology-BSA 2011.
Doherty A, Jackson D, Hammerla N, Plotz T, Olivier P, Granat MH, White T, van Hees VT, Trenell MI, Owen CG, Preece SJ, Gillions R, Sheard S, Peakman T, Brage S, Wareham NJ. Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):e0169649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169649. eCollection 2017.
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):197-201. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093154. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
Clarke CL, Taylor J, Crighton LJ, Goodbrand JA, McMurdo MET, Witham MD. Validation of the AX3 triaxial accelerometer in older functionally impaired people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):451-457. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0604-8. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540.
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
Guerraz M, Yardley L, Bertholon P, Pollak L, Rudge P, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM. Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. Brain. 2001 Aug;124(Pt 8):1646-56. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1646.
Bisdorff A, Von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman-Toker DE. Classification of vestibular symptoms: towards an international classification of vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2009;19(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.3233/VES-2009-0343. No abstract available.
Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):424-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870040046011.
Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Brown KE, Furman JM. Is perception of handicap related to functional performance in persons with vestibular dysfunction? Otol Neurotol. 2004 Mar;25(2):139-43. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200403000-00010.
Skerrett TN, Moss-Morris R. Fatigue and social impairment in multiple sclerosis: the role of patients' cognitive and behavioral responses to their symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Nov;61(5):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.04.018.
Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.
Lajoie Y, Gallagher SP. Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(03)00082-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LRS-18/19-8994
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.