Comparative Efficacy of Two Different Dual-task Balance Interventions
NCT ID: NCT03234998
Last Updated: 2020-10-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-25
2019-02-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Balance Training in Older Adults With Dementia
NCT02073318
Balance Recovery and Training on Fall Prevention in Stroke
NCT00173992
Effects of Single-task Versus Dual-task Training on balancePERFORMANCE
NCT03608111
Development and Evaluation of a Home-Based Dual-Task Training Program to Improve Balance Performance for Older Adults
NCT02280928
Effects of Passive Lower-limb Exoskeleton-assisted Training on Motor and Daily Function Improvements in Older Adults
NCT06543888
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. Title of Study:
Comparative efficacy of two different dual-task balance interventions on balance, gait, and cognitive performance under single- and dual-task conditions in stroke patients and older adults
II. Study Objectives:
The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of two different dual-task balance interventions for stroke patients and older adults. Specifically, the investigators will compare the immediate and retention effects of motor and cognitive dual-task balance training \[MCDT\] and cognitive dual-task balance training \[CDT\]) on balance, gait, and cognition under single- and dual-task conditions in individuals with stroke (Aim 1) and elderly people (Aim 2). The third aim of this study is to elucidate the mechanisms underlying changes in balance, gait, and cognitive performance of stroke patients and older adults after MCDC and CDT (Aim 3).
III. Study Design A prospective randomized control trial will be conducted at medical centers in this study. Fifty stroke patients and 48 elderly people will be randomly allocated to either MCDT or CDT group. Both groups will receive 12 hours of training over 4 weeks at progressively increasing task difficulty (60 minutes per session, three times a week, for four weeks). The CDT group will undertake dual-task balance training and concurrently perform only cognitive tasks with instruction of a variable priority. The MCDT group will train the same set of balance/gait activities as the CDT while simultaneously performing motor and cognitive tasks with instruction of a variable priority. During each session, all participants practice shifting attention between tasks by spending half of the training attention focus on the balance task, and half focus on the secondary cognitive or motor tasks. A blinded assessor will conduct three assessments at baseline, post intervention, and 1-month follow-up. At baseline, all participants will be examined balance, gait, and cognitive performance under single-task (standing, walking, cognitive tasks only) and dual-task conditions (standing/walking while performing cognitive tasks). Six cognitive tasks (simple reaction time task, serial three subtractions task, Stroop task, auditory Stroop task, spatial memory task, and choice reaction time task) will be used to examine dual-task performance because these tasks represent different domains of cognitive function (information processing speed, working memory, and executive function). The primary outcome measure of balance, gait, and cognition will be the sway index, gait speed, and composite score of accuracy and reaction time under single- and dual-task conditions. Secondary outcome measures will include: Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test under single- and dual-task conditions, Functional Gait Assessment, Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Chair Stand Test, and Patient Global Impression of Change. Repeated measure ANOVA will be used to compare measurements at baseline, after training, and follow-up between the groups.
Number of Planned Patients: 50 stroke patients and 48 elderly people Duration of the Study: 2017/08/01~2020/07/31
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
motor-cognitive dual-task training
Participants in the motor-cognitive dual-task training group will participate in 12-session programs administered for 60 minutes each session, 3 times per week for 4 weeks.
motor-cognitive dual-task training
Participants in the motor-cognitive dual-task training group will will receive an individually-progressed program of dual-task balance/gait training aimed at improving standing balance, sit-to-stand, and walking abilities under motor-cognitive dual-task conditions.
cognitive dual-task training
Participants in the cognitive dual-task training group will also participate in a 12-session program conducted 60 minutes per session, 3 days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.
cognitive dual-task training
Participants in the cognitive dual-task training group will perform only cognitive tasks (verbal fluency tasks, calculation tasks, and visual discrimination tasks) concurrently with the balance/gait tasks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
motor-cognitive dual-task training
Participants in the motor-cognitive dual-task training group will will receive an individually-progressed program of dual-task balance/gait training aimed at improving standing balance, sit-to-stand, and walking abilities under motor-cognitive dual-task conditions.
cognitive dual-task training
Participants in the cognitive dual-task training group will perform only cognitive tasks (verbal fluency tasks, calculation tasks, and visual discrimination tasks) concurrently with the balance/gait tasks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* able to walk 10 m
* no severe vision, hearing, and language problems
* more than 65 years old
* able to walk 10 m
* no neurological or musculoskeletal diagnosis
* no severe vision, hearing, cognition, and language problems.
Exclusion Criteria
* other treatments that could influence the effects of the interventions (e.g., recent Botulin toxin treatment of the lower extremity)
* moderate or severe cognitive impairments (score \<21 on Mini-Mental State Examination)
* severe uncorrected visual deficits
30 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Li-Ling Chuang
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Li-Ling Chuang, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung University
Taoyuan, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1612190002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.