Effects of Dual Task Prioritization Training on Dual Task Walking in Older People

NCT ID: NCT05367128

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-25

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this single-blinded three-armed randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effect of different task prioritization during dual task training on dual task performance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Many activities of daily livings involve performing two tasks simultaneously, i.e. dual tasking. Performing dual task increases the demand on attentional resources, which may further decrease the dual task performance, especially in older adults. According to capacity sharing theory, the two tasks compete and influence with each other due to limited attention and information processing capacity. It has been noted that task prioritization during dual tasking may influence the dual task performance. Previous study indicated that supraposture-focus strategy resulted in better posture and task performance in older people. On the other hand, it is known that dual task training improved dual task performance. However, the effects of applying task prioritization during dual task training have not yet been investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of different task prioritization during dual task training on dual task performance.

Methods: Participants will be randomized into three groups: posture-focus, supraposture-focus and control group. Participants will receive a total of 12 sessions of cognitive dual task training with different prioritization strategies, i.e. prioritization on posture, cognitive or neither task. Walking and task performance during dual task walking, executive function, and balance performance will be assessed before and after the interventions (pre- and post-test).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Older People

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Posture-focus group

Participants will be instructed to pay most attention to practice the posture task during training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dual task training

Intervention Type OTHER

All participants will receive cognitive dual task training for 30 min/session, 2-3 sessions/week for 4-6 weeks (a total of 12 sessions). The cognitive dual task training includes 15 min of cognitive task combining with standing task and 15 min of cognitive task combining with walking task. The differences among group are the instructions of task prioritization given by the therapist

Supraposture-focus group

Participants will be instructed to pay most attention to practice the cognitive task during training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dual task training

Intervention Type OTHER

All participants will receive cognitive dual task training for 30 min/session, 2-3 sessions/week for 4-6 weeks (a total of 12 sessions). The cognitive dual task training includes 15 min of cognitive task combining with standing task and 15 min of cognitive task combining with walking task. The differences among group are the instructions of task prioritization given by the therapist

Control group

Participants will not be receive any instruction to prioritize either task

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dual task training

Intervention Type OTHER

All participants will receive cognitive dual task training for 30 min/session, 2-3 sessions/week for 4-6 weeks (a total of 12 sessions). The cognitive dual task training includes 15 min of cognitive task combining with standing task and 15 min of cognitive task combining with walking task. The differences among group are the instructions of task prioritization given by the therapist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dual task training

All participants will receive cognitive dual task training for 30 min/session, 2-3 sessions/week for 4-6 weeks (a total of 12 sessions). The cognitive dual task training includes 15 min of cognitive task combining with standing task and 15 min of cognitive task combining with walking task. The differences among group are the instructions of task prioritization given by the therapist

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years old
* MMSE scores \> 24

Exclusion Criteria

* Unstable health conditions
* Any neurological, psychological disease or diagnosis of learning disability which interferes the participation in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ray-Yau Wang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ray-Yau Wang, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ray-Yau Wang, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+886-2-2826-7210

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ray-Yau Wang, PhD

Role: primary

+886-2-28267210

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YM111015F

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.