Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-05
2024-04-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study hypothesis is that an accelerated nursing care system for traumatized ankle and/or foot patients is feasible and allows patients to be cared for in accordance to current medical recommendations. Such a branch should be followed by a return to work and sports within a time frame consistent with the literature. The duration of patient management in emergency department should be short, less than that observed in a historical cohort. Finally patient satisfaction should be high. In the medium term, the implementation of an accelerated nursing branch for the diagnosis and treatment of ankle and/or foot injuries should contribute to effective care and reduction of over activity in emergency departments.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Systematic Ultrasound in the Initial Assessment of Ankle Sprain
NCT06856889
Interest of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Severity of Lateral Ankle Sprain
NCT04846712
A Prospective Study Comparing Different Clinical Decision Rules in Adult and Pediatric Ankle Trauma
NCT01205841
ANKLE TRAUMA Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Compared to Standard Radiography in the Detection of Fractures
NCT05528432
Efficacy of Nasal Oxygen Therapy to Reduce Postoperative Complications in Ankle Trauma Surgery in At-risk Patients: a Randomized Pilot Study.
NCT05185115
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to assess the accelerated nursing branch for the diagnosis and treatment of ankle and/or foot injuries in emergency department.
Target Follow-Up duration: 1 month (30 days).
The study will be conducted in 3 phases:
1. Training volunteer emergency department nurses. The training course of 10-hours session (2 hours e-learning and 8 hours attendance) will cover all aspects of management of ankle and/or foot injuries (from diagnosis to treatment). The nurses will have at least one year of clinical experience in emergency department. This training will be conducted by medical experts (emergency doctor, radiologist and orthopedist ). At the end of the training a formative assessment both theoretical and practical will be carried out with participants.
The following intervention will be performed by emergency nurses:
* Pain intensity assessment
* Record of the trauma mechanism and history of the patient
* Ottawa rules and clinical examination
* Radiographic prescription and interpretation
* Prescription and interpretation of additional examination
* Foot and Ankle Survey (FAO)
* Evaluation of ankle joint function
* Treatment: medicine prescription, immobilization, physiotherapy…. Following the management of ankle and/or foot injuries patients by a nurse, every working day a systemic review of the emergency file including X-rays performed will be carried out by a medical staff composed of an emergency doctor, an orthopedist and a radiologist. This review will be done every morning in the emergency department.
2. Enroll patients admitted to the emergency department for ankle and/or foot injuries. The ability of trained nurses to treat these traumas will be assessed.
3. Phone follow-up of patient after one month to collect data: the date of return to work or sports, patient satisfaction and possible consultation (by a physician, an orthopedist and/or care consummation).
Two groups of data will be collected: clinical and paraclinical parameters. Clinical parameters: respiratory rate, saturation, blood pressure, heart rate, Glasgow score , weight, size, Numerical Scale ranges of pain , Ottawa rule, treatment, radiography..
Paraclinical parameters: radiography examination, X-ray interpretation, Foot and Ankle Survey(FAS), Evaluation of ankle joint function, patient satisfaction survey, follow-up at one month (30 days).
Outcome measure
The overall adequacy of care will be assessed at the end of the study by a committee of experts whose judgment will be based on the latest medical recommendations. This expert committee will consist of an orthopedic physician, a radiologist, an emergency physician and a quality health executive (nurse) and will make decisions by consensus. These members will be independent of the investigators of the study. The delivered care will be considered globally adequate if it respects the recognized indications of:
* Realization and interpretation of radiography (Ottawa criteria and early radiography service protocol)
* analgesic treatments according to the recommendations of the scientific societies (acetaminophen for EN\> 0 +/- WHO step 2 treatment for pain of moderate intensity and WHO step 3 for pain of severe intensity)
* Immobilization: according to the recommendations of the scientific societies: protocol RICE (Rest, Ice,Compression and elevation) immobilization plastered in case of fracture etc.
* Specialist advice: orthopedic opinion if a fracture or other severe pathology is detected
Study design
• Estimation enrollment: 66 participants A sample of 60 patients can be used to estimate an adequate percentage of care tending towards 100% (optimal management defined by the experts), with an accuracy of 5% corresponding to the lower limit of the one-sided confidence interval. 95% (PASS vs 15.0.5., NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, Utah, USA). This is equivalent to establishing 95% non-inferiority using an exact one-sided test with a power of 80% (Normal approximation). A rate of patients lost to follow-up estimated at 10% implies that 66 patients will have to be included.
Analysis:
The main objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of managing ankle or foot trauma by an emergency nurse protocol, describing the percentage of patients who are adequately cared for by this protocol. Statistical methods will therefore be essentially descriptive.
The descriptive analysis will cover all the variables collected. The quantitative parameters for which normality has been accepted will be described by mean and standard deviation. They will be expressed as median, 25th and 75th percentiles when normality has been rejected. The qualitative parameters will be expressed in numbers and percentages framed by their 95% confidence interval.
Serious Adverse events The individual risk is related to a possible misdiagnosis of the nurse who took care of the patient, requiring a further consultation with a general practitioner or emergency. A systematic re-reading of x-rays by the daily medical staff is planned in working days. Patients will be contacted directly by an emergency doctor to advise them to consult their treating or specialist doctor, in case of anomaly detected during the re-reading of the radiography and / or a marked adequacy on the immobilization techniques.
In addition, the following adverse events are likely to occur, related to the management of on-trial trauma care:
* Complications related to limb immobilization (venous thrombosis, eschar, nerve and/or vascular compression)
* Complications related to analgesics Given the purpose of the research and the low risk associated with the investigation procedures, no monitoring committee and no interim analysis are planned. In the event of a security alert, the expert committee will inform the promoter.
In the event of an adverse event considered to be severe by the investigator and possibly involving the health of the subjects, the investigator may stop the study in agreement with the promoter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient admitted for Ankle and foot injuries
Diagnosis and treatment of Ankle and foot injuries by an accelerated nursing branch in emergency department
Diagnosis and treatment
Monocentric, Prospective and Biomedical Research excluding Health Product
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Diagnosis and treatment
Monocentric, Prospective and Biomedical Research excluding Health Product
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Admission to emergency department \< 48 hours after the trauma
* Written informed consent must be obtained
* For women of childbearing age: effective contraception in place for at least 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Obvious open fracture
* Ankle fracture or obvious deformation
* Suspicion of polytrauma
* Anterior surgery of the ankle and/or foot
* Excessive alcoholization or intoxication by other psychoactive substances
* Persons unable to communicate in french, with impaired comprehension skills and consciousness (problem with mental health)
* Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision), persons deprived of liberty
* Non-affiliated to the french social security system (or equivalent)
* Pregnant or nursing women
* Patient participating in any interventional clinical reserach study
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Damien VIGLINO, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emergency Department of University Hospital Grenoble
Nicolas TERMOZ MASSON, Bachelor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Emergency Department of University Hospital Grenoble
Alexandra BICHET, Bachelor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Emergency Department of University Hospital Grenoble
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
Grenoble, Isere, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
38RC19.200
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.