Comparative Study of Two Radiological Modalities, Ultrasonography Versus Stress Radiography, in the Urgent Care and Prognosis of Lateral Ankle Sprain (TALOS)

NCT ID: NCT00639028

Last Updated: 2014-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

390 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of our study is to determine the most efficient radiologic examination to assess the ankle sprain seriousness and so improve the therapeutic care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The lateral ankle sprain is the most frequent purpose of consultation in emergency traumatology of the locomotive system.

If the ankle sprain is neglected or badly cared, it can induce a recurrence or several complications particularly functional ones. So a gravity diagnosis is necessary in order to choose the most accurate treatment.

Considering the difficulty of the clinical estimation, additional examinations aim to support the positive diagnosis, to clarify the gravity and to dismiss differential diagnosis.

Thus we suggest to evaluate three strategies in order to get a gravity diagnosis, make a better choice of treatment and so decrease the long-term functional complications : instability and recurrence.

The patients are randomly separated into three groups of 130 people. All the patients have a radiography and then, according to their group, they have either an ultrasonography or an ultrasonography and a stress radiography or only a stress radiography. The patients are followed up during two years by sending two questionnaires (CAIT and LEFS) at one and two years. The functional scores of these questionnaires assess and compare the functional complications for each group. Thus the radiologic examinations can be assessed in term of prognosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lateral Ankle Sprain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Ankle echography

Group Type OTHER

Ankle echography

Intervention Type OTHER

Ankle echography

2

echography + stress radiography

Group Type OTHER

Ankle echography + stress radiography

Intervention Type OTHER

Ankle echography + stress radiography

3

stress radiography

Group Type OTHER

stress radiography

Intervention Type OTHER

ankle stress radiography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ankle echography

Ankle echography

Intervention Type OTHER

Ankle echography + stress radiography

Ankle echography + stress radiography

Intervention Type OTHER

stress radiography

ankle stress radiography

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Lateral ankle sprain.
* Sprain occurred for less than 48 hours.
* Age between 18 and 55.
* Person affiliated at the Social Security.

Exclusion Criteria

* Recurrent lateral ankle sprain occurred for less than 2 years and diagnosed by a doctor.
* Bilateral sprain, medio-tarsal sprain, syndesmosis sprain, subtalar sprain.
* Tendinous luxation (fibular, posterior tibial).
* Homolateral ankle fracture occurred for less than 2 years.
* Cuboid fracture, external tubercle of astragalus fracture, calcaneum fracture, fracture of the talus extremity, base of the fifth metatarsal bone fracture.
* Tearing of internal malleolus, tearing of astragalus posterior tubercle.
* Osteochondral lesions of the astragalus dome.
* Probable difficulty to follow up the patient.
* Patient taking anticoagulant.
* Pregnant woman, parturient, breast-feeding mother.
* Person deprived of freedom after a judicial or an administrative decision, person with legal protection measure.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Jacques Banihachemi

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emergency department - University Hospital of Grenoble South

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Picard F, Tourne Y, Montbarbon E, Saragaglia D. [Ankle trauma. Diagnostic orientation]. Rev Prat. 1995 Nov 15;45(18):2335-42. No abstract available. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8578138 (View on PubMed)

Braun BL. Effects of ankle sprain in a general clinic population 6 to 18 months after medical evaluation. Arch Fam Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;8(2):143-8. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.2.143.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10101985 (View on PubMed)

Brasseur JL, Tardieu M. [Accurate use of imaging in ankle sprain]. JBR-BTR. 1999 Apr;82(2):63-8. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10874392 (View on PubMed)

Raatikainen T, Putkonen M, Puranen J. Arthrography, clinical examination, and stress radiograph in the diagnosis of acute injury to the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Am J Sports Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;20(1):2-6. doi: 10.1177/036354659202000102.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1554068 (View on PubMed)

Brasseur JL, Morvan G, Godoc B. [Dynamic ultrasonography]. J Radiol. 2005 Dec;86(12 Pt 2):1904-10. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(05)81544-6. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16308555 (View on PubMed)

Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16935061 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DCIC 07 02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.