ANKLE TRAUMA Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Compared to Standard Radiography in the Detection of Fractures
NCT ID: NCT05528432
Last Updated: 2022-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-01
2022-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interest of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Severity of Lateral Ankle Sprain
NCT04846712
A Prospective Study Comparing Different Clinical Decision Rules in Adult and Pediatric Ankle Trauma
NCT01205841
Ultrasound Analysis of Suspected Long Bone Fractures in the Emergency Department - Diagnostic Performance Compared to Radiography.
NCT05928065
Comparison of Ultrasound and X-ray as Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Lower Extremity Stress Fracture.
NCT03116360
Classification of Ankle Injury Observed With X-ray Combined With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT02971943
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Care will be provided by the attending physician and, according to "standard of care", treatment decisions will be based on history taking, physical examination and conventional ankle x-ray series. Sonographic results will not be used for this purpose. All ankle x-ray series will be reviewed by a senior resident radiologist.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
\+ one or more criteria of the Ottawa ankle rules :
* Inability to walk 4 steps immediately after the trauma or in the emergency room,
* pain at the level of the internal or external malleolus (the distal 6 cm) or the base of the 5th metatarsal bone.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any patient unable to sign the informed consent
* Skin lesions contraindicating sonography (e.g. open fracture wound, … )
* An unstable patient whose inclusion in the study would delay vital treatment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laeticia Vaiana FL Frezals, Médecin
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
FREZALS Laeticia Vaiana
Brussels, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bozkurt O, Ersel M, Karbek Akarca F, Yalcinli S, Midik S, Kucuk L. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in determining the reduction success of distal radius fractures. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 10;18(3):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.04.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Frezals LV, Delafontaine A, Scoubeau H, Sontou R, Moorthamers S, Plumacker A, Plumacker A. Diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound compared to standard radiography for fracture detection in the emergency department by non-radiologist physicians: a monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Feb 14;51(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02772-3.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Ferràs-Tarragó, J., Antequera-Cano, J.M., Català-de-las-Marinas, J. et al. Ankle torque-related fractures and its echo-fast diagnosis protocol. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 46, 801-805 (2020)
Doherty, C., Delahunt, E., Caulfield, B. et al. The Incidence and Prevalence of Ankle Sprain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Epidemiological Studies. Sports Med 44, 123-140 (2014)
Champagne N, Eadie L, Regan L, Wilson P. The effectiveness of ultrasound in the detection of fractures in adults with suspected upper or lower limb injury: a systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis. BMC Emergency Medicine 2019;19
Nelson BP, Chason K. Use of ultrasound by emergency medical services: a review. International Journal of Emergency Medicine 2008 12;1(4):253-259
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CE-21-02-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.