IMPULSE - StIMulation of Brain Plasticity to Improve Upper Limb Recovery After StrokE
NCT ID: NCT04124367
Last Updated: 2022-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-25
2022-03-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this study is to assess whether an additional therapy with Cerebrolysin and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) increases the success of conventional rehabilitation therapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients with unexploited potential for functional recovery despite intact structural and functional pathways in the brain.
Hypothesis:
The hypothesis is that the combination of Cerebrolysin and atDCS facilitates motor learning in subacute and chronic stroke patients. Accordingly, motor function recovery at day 21 post-baseline is expected to be higher in the verum group (conventional rehabilitation + task-specific motor training + Cerebrolysin + atDCS) as compared to the control group (conventional rehabilitation + task-specific motor training + placebo + sham-transcranial direct current stimulation).
The primary objective is to show a significantly higher proportional recovery rate in the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at day 21 post-baseline in the verum group as compared to the control group.
The secondary objective is to assess the impact of this neuroplastic intervention on finger dexterity (Nine-hole peg test - 9HPT), hand grip strength, and neurological deficits (National Institutes of Healths Stroke Scale - NIHSS) at the end of therapy (day 21 post-baseline). Safety data are collected throughout the study and thereafter in case of ongoing serious adverse events (SAEs) at study endpoint.
Optional secondary parameters include electroencephalography (EEG) parameters and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) status analyses to document plastic changes in the brain, in particular changes of the cortical network functionality during neurorehabilitation, and to assess the impact of neuroplastic intervention on the BDNF synthesis rate as well as the influence of different BDNF polymorphisms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comprehensive Reparative Therapy in Ischemic Stroke COMplex Repair in Ischemic Stroke-Arm
NCT02581371
Intensive Neurorehabilitation and Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT03947645
Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Contralesional Hemisphere on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT03635008
Rehabilitation Combined With Bihemispherictranscranial Direct Current Stimulation in Subacute Ischemic Stroke
NCT01644929
Clinical Study for Upper Limb Motor Restoration in Chronic Stroke Patients Using Personalized Neuro-technologies
NCT04448483
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Verum
Cerebrolysin
30 ml once daily (+70 ml 0.9% saline)
non-invasive brain stimulation
2 mA/35 cm² for 2x20 minutes, once daily
Control
Placebo
100 ml once daily 0.9% saline
sham intervention
0 mA/35 cm² for 2x20 minutes, once daily Run-in phase consisting of ramp-up (10 seconds), stimulation (10 seconds), and ramp-down (10 seconds).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cerebrolysin
30 ml once daily (+70 ml 0.9% saline)
non-invasive brain stimulation
2 mA/35 cm² for 2x20 minutes, once daily
Placebo
100 ml once daily 0.9% saline
sham intervention
0 mA/35 cm² for 2x20 minutes, once daily Run-in phase consisting of ramp-up (10 seconds), stimulation (10 seconds), and ramp-down (10 seconds).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 8 weeks to 12 months after a first-ever hemispheric subcortical ischemic stroke, confirmed by imaging
* Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 or 1
* Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score 13-50, both inclusive
* Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) score ≥5
* Patient participates voluntarily and gave written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
o Study procedures:
1. Severe sensory deficits (score of 2 on item 8 of the NIHSS)
2. Severe aphasia (a score of ≥2 on item 9 of the NIHSS)
3. Severe neglect (a score of 2 on item 11 of the NIHSS)
4. Co-morbid conditions such as fractures, osteoarthritis, fixed or severely interfering contraction or deformity in the affected limb, polyneuropathy and/or ischemic peripheral disease if the sensorimotor functions of the upper extremities are affected, other neurological disease(s) or known brain abnormalities, acute coronary syndrome, severe heart disease (NYHA class III or IV), cancer, severe liver disease (hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy \[prothrombin time prolonged beyond the normal range\] and clinically relevant bleeding risk including cirrhotic patients with Child Pugh B and C), and other major medical conditions that, in the opinion of the site investigator, might influence efficacy or safety assessment
5. MMSE \<20
6. Current drug or alcohol use or dependency that would interfere with adherence to study procedures
7. Participation in another interventional study
* Spasticity:
8. Major spasticity as indicated by the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale \>2/4 in either elbow flexors, wrist flexors or finger flexors of the affected limb
9. Injection of botulinum toxin to the affected upper limb in the last three months, or the need of an injection of botulinum toxin anytime during the study period
10. Injection of phenol to the affected upper limb in the last six months, or the need of an injection of phenol anytime during the study period
Exposure-related:
11. Pacemaker or brain stimulator
12. Implanted intracranial metals in the stimulation area such as clipping, coilings, ventriculo-peritoneal shunts, endoprosthesis, cochlear implant
13. Scalp wounds or infections in the area of stimulation
14. Any condition that would represent a contraindication for Cerebrolysin administration:
* hypersensitivity to one of the components of the drug
* epilepsy
* severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 ml/min/1.73 m2 as assessed at local laboratory within one month before screening)
15. Breastfeeding; pregnant or trying to become pregnant
16. Concomitant medications
* with potential negative effects on cortical excitability or plasticity (e.g. psycholeptics (ATC class N05), antiepileptics, neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, dextromethorphan)
* with potential positive effects on cortical excitability or plasticity (e.g. SSRIs, SNRIs, dopaminergic preparations, memantine, AChEIs, amphetamines) - except if the patient is on a stable dose for a minimum of four weeks. Special attention should be given to possible additive effects when Cerebrolysin is used in conjunction with antidepressants/MAO inhibitors. High doses of MAO inhibitors in combination with higher dosages of Cerebrolysin (30-40 ml) have been reported to increase blood pressure.
* with neuroprotective/neurotrophic/nootropic effects (e.g. ginkgo biloba, erythropoietin, citicoline, amantadine, piracetam)
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VASCage GmbH
OTHER
Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andreas Winkler, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Klinik Pirawarth
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinik Pirawarth
Bad Pirawarth, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EVER-AT-0618
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.