Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-27
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Error-enhanced Learning & Recovery in 2 & 3 Dimensions
NCT05180786
Upper Limb-based Movement Priming for Lower Limb Neuroplasticity & Motor Recovery in Stroke
NCT05919043
Effects of Two Different Kinds of Exercise on Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT00108680
Ventilatory Muscle Training in Stroke
NCT02828943
Forced Aerobic Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT02494518
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
From the admission evaluations by the study physician and other rehabilitation services, patients with adequate language, visuospatial, cognitive and motor function will be consented for participation and then screened by a study evaluation physical therapist and board-certified neurological clinical specialist for the specific motor inclusion criteria. After consent, a REDCap screening form will be initiated by the study physician's project coordinator with relevant data from the participant medical record. The study evaluation therapist will then conduct the screening that will include verification and completion of the inclusion/exclusion criteria and the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) safety checklist that will identify any contraindication to TMS-based assessment of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment (primary motor inclusion criteria) is very time efficient reducing interference with in-patient therapy activities and rapidly identifying individuals with severe impairment facilitating participant recruitment. The study evaluation therapist will not need to complete the entire assessment instead only confirming patients at level 2 and 3 out of 7 for inclusion. The REDCap screening form and TMS checklist will be reviewed by the study physician. The study physician will grant medical clearance for TMS-based MEP assessment and participation in the study.
Regarding motor criteria; participants not meeting the minimum of Stage 2 out of 7 on the Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment will be monitored for emergence of adequate movement. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab therapists routinely report Chedoke scores in daily documentation. The study physician and project coordinator will notify the study evaluation therapist once minimal movement emerges in these patients and the screening process can be initiated. Participants who subsequently pass screening and medical clearance for TMS-based MEP assessment will undergo conventional MEP assessment. Participants will later be randomly allocated to either the experimental or comparison treatment groups within REDCap by the study intervention therapist upon the first intervention session. The REDCap randomization algorithm is managed by the study biostatistics team and employs a concealed allocation table. The allocation table is constructed to balance the allocation of participants (2 groups of n=43) by sex, presence or absence of MEPs, and level of severity as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Assessment in order to ensure equivalent baseline characteristics of each group. The Fugl-Meyer score will be divided in bins of 6 points. Participants, evaluation therapists, biostatisticians, and the study PD/PI will be blinded to group assignment. Intervention therapists and the study physician will not be blinded to group assignment. Participants will not be able to tell the difference between interventions since both will involve reaching practice. Participants that are not medically cleared for TMS-based MEP assessment will be randomly allocated to group without MEP status. It is anticipated that only 1-2% of participants will not be cleared for MEP assessment.
Baseline and subsequent evaluations will include a kinematic/kinetic measurement of reaching function (primary endpoint, reaching distance under standardized abduction loading, normal gravity) and a kinematic/kinetic measurement of shoulder/elbow impairment (secondary endpoint, loss of independent joint control). The primary and secondary endpoints will be conducted at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab during both in-patient and day-rehabilitation by the study evaluation therapist under following initial training and certification by the study PD/PI. Standardized clinical evaluations of arm impairment, activity limitation, and participation restriction will also be performed during this phase at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab by the study evaluation therapist who will be blinded to intervention group. Evaluations will take place at baseline, weekly until discharge from rehabilitation, and then bimonthly until 12 months post-baseline measurement. Following discharge from rehabilitation, patients will receive follow-up evaluations bimonthly at Northwestern University Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences. These evaluations will be conducted by a second study evaluation therapist and board-certified neurological clinical specialist following initial training and certification by the study PD/PI. The second study evaluation therapist will also serve as the backup for the first study evaluation therapist in case of illness/absence.
During in-patient rehabilitation and day-rehabilitation, experimental and comparison intervention sessions will parallel regular therapy and be conducted at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and Streeterville Day Rehabilitation Center respectively by two Shirley Ryan AbilityLab study intervention therapists. Study intervention therapists will be initially trained and certified by the study PD/PI. Study intervention sessions will be 5 days per week during in-patient therapy and 3 days per week during day-rehabilitation. The intervention period for both groups will be \~45 minutes (truncated at 1 hour) in addition to the regular therapy schedule until discharge. Both interventions will involve performing standardized reaching exercises to outward targets displayed on a monitor. The experimental group receiving progressive abduction loading therapy will practice reaching exercises with abduction loading and the comparison group will practice reaching supported on a horizontal haptic table. All participants will have the same maximum number of sets and repetitions of exercise during sessions and the sessions will be truncated at 60 minutes of total contact time. Half of the enrolled participants are expected to transition to day-rehabilitation following in-patient rehabilitation. In day-rehabilitation, participants will continue to receive the same study intervention but only 3 days per week matching the day-rehabilitation schedule.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Abduction Loading
The intervention for the experimental group entails practicing reaching with abduction loading.
Abduction Loading
The intervention for the experimental group entails practicing reaching with abduction loading.
Supported Reaching
The intervention for the active comparator entails practicing reaching while supported.
Supported Reaching
The intervention for the active comparator entails practicing reaching while supported.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Abduction Loading
The intervention for the experimental group entails practicing reaching with abduction loading.
Supported Reaching
The intervention for the active comparator entails practicing reaching while supported.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Stroke impacting parenchyma of the middle cerebral artery distribution
3. Within 90 days post-stroke
4. 18 to 85 years old
5. No or Mild-to-moderate Aphasia (NIHSS #9 Best Language. = 0 or 1- Describe picture; No or Mild-to-moderate Aphasia)
6. No or Mild extinction and inattention (NIHSS 11 Extinction and Inattention. = 0 or 1- No abnormality or Inattention to one modality.)
7. Ability to perform a 3-step motor command with the unaffected arm
8. Capacity to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Brainstem and/or cerebellar lesion
3. Comorbidity medically contraindicating motor assessments
4. Any other chronic neurological condition
5. Pain or hypersensitivity limiting motor assessments
6. Limb edema limiting study motor assessments
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
OTHER
Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital & Clinics
OTHER
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Ellis
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael D Ellis, PT, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Northwestern Medicine Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital
Wheaton, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yamada K. The glossophyaryngeal nerve response to taste and thermal stimuli in the rat, rabbit and cat. Kumamoto Med J. 1965 Jun 30;18(2):106-8. No abstract available.
Martig J, Riser WH, Germann F. Deforming ankylosis of the coffin joint in calves. Vet Rec. 1972 Sep 23;91(13):307-10. doi: 10.1136/vr.91.13.307. No abstract available.
Chou MY, Malison MD. Outbreak of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis due to coxsackie A24 variant--Taiwan. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Apr;127(4):795-800. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114861.
Roth HR, Carmona C, Clark G, Gyarmaty JE, Dewald JPA, Giblin E, Harvey RL, Jaskiewicz J, Kim KA, Lancki N, Luhrsen A, Mandana A, Manikonda D, Morris A, Sheth S, Stoykov ME, Young AC, Zielke D, Ellis MD. PRALINE: study protocol for a phase IIb inpatient stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trial investigating longitudinal outcomes after progressive abduction loading therapy. Trials. 2025 Jul 20;26(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08969-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00209671
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.