Investigation of Acceptable Dose of Mobilisation and Tactile Stimulation to Enhance Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke
NCT ID: NCT00360997
Last Updated: 2018-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-03-31
2008-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Whether Functional Strength Training Can Enhance Motor Recovery of the Upper Limb After Stroke
NCT00360789
Evaluation of Whether Functional Strength Training Can Enhance Recovery of Mobility After Stroke
NCT00322192
Multi-user Touch Surfaces for Promoting Social Participation and Self-efficacy in Upper-limb Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT05316766
Effectiveness of Active Exploration of Simulated Textures for Sensorimotor Recovery
NCT06962397
Self-directed Adapted Gaming Exercises for Stroke Survivors
NCT04475692
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Questions In stroke patients with paralysis or severe paresis which dose of MTS therapy a) produces the least adverse events; b) has the most beneficial effect on voluntary muscle contraction and functional ability. This study will also address: c) whether the magnitude of sensory/motor cortex activation prior to MTS can predict response to MTS; and, d) whether changes in sensory and/or motor cortex activation correlate with improvement.
Subjects (n=80) from two clinical centres with an anterior cerebral circulation stroke 8 to 84 days before recruitment, paresis or severe paralysis and no clinically important pain affecting the upper arm or shoulder after stroke.
Methods After baseline measures (Day 1) subjects will be randomised to a) no extra therapy; or one of three doses of MTS therapy for 14 consecutive working days, b) 30 minutes; c) 60 minutes; or, d) 120 minutes. All subjects will receive the conventional therapy normally provided within each centre. On Day 16, outcome measures will be made. The experimental intervention, MTS therapy will be individualised for each subject from a standardised schedule of techniques within treatment categories including: passive movements, massage; specific sensory input; and, functional movement. The measurement battery will be: a) efficacy, Motricity Index Arm Section and the Action Research Arm Test; b) adverse events, presence of upper limb pain and decrease in Motricity Index score; and c) Functional MRI (London subjects), T1 weighted anatomical images and T2\* weighted MRI transverse echo-planar images undertaking these studies with both sensory and motor paradigms where feasible.
Analysis Analysis for efficacy and adverse events will be conducted using the Chi-squared test for trend or linear regression as appropriate. The results will be combined to determine the most appropriate dose of MTS. Imaging data will be processed using Statistical Parametric Mapping and then analysed statistically using a least mean squares fit of the model to the data to determine regions of significant activation for each session.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Behavioural
Conventional UK physical therapy (Con UK PT)
Conventional UK physical therapy
Con UK PT + MTS
Con UK PT + 30/60 or 120 minutes MTS
Con UK PT + Mobilisation & tactile stimulation (MTS)
Con UK PT + Mobilisation \& Tactile Stimulation (MTS) which is further randomised to 30, 60 or 120 mins/day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional UK physical therapy
Con UK PT + Mobilisation & tactile stimulation (MTS)
Con UK PT + Mobilisation \& Tactile Stimulation (MTS) which is further randomised to 30, 60 or 120 mins/day
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have a paralysed or severely paretic upper limb as measured by a score of 61/100 or less on the Motricity Index Arm Section17
Exclusion Criteria
* Visible upper limb movement deficits attributable to pathology other than stroke
* Unable to follow a 1-stage command using their non-paretic upper limb (ie severe communication or other cognitive deficits precluding ability to participate in MTS).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St George's, University of London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Valerie M Pomeroy, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
St George's, University of London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
St Thomas' Foundation Hospital NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TSA 2005/03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.