Investigation of Acceptable Dose of Mobilisation and Tactile Stimulation to Enhance Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT00360997

Last Updated: 2018-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to find which of three doses of mobilisation and tactile stimulation therapy, when given in addition to conventional UK physical therapy, has the most beneficial effect on enhancing motor recovery of the upper limb early after stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background The scientific evidence indicates that upper limb motor recovery may be enhanced with the appropriate dose of afferent stimulation normally arising from functional activities. Even if the appropriate dose was known, people with severe paresis or paralysis would not be able to participate in functional training. For these people "mobilization and tactile stimulation" (MTS) therapy might enhance: upper limb recovery, and, changes in brain regions that can influence motor output.

Questions In stroke patients with paralysis or severe paresis which dose of MTS therapy a) produces the least adverse events; b) has the most beneficial effect on voluntary muscle contraction and functional ability. This study will also address: c) whether the magnitude of sensory/motor cortex activation prior to MTS can predict response to MTS; and, d) whether changes in sensory and/or motor cortex activation correlate with improvement.

Subjects (n=80) from two clinical centres with an anterior cerebral circulation stroke 8 to 84 days before recruitment, paresis or severe paralysis and no clinically important pain affecting the upper arm or shoulder after stroke.

Methods After baseline measures (Day 1) subjects will be randomised to a) no extra therapy; or one of three doses of MTS therapy for 14 consecutive working days, b) 30 minutes; c) 60 minutes; or, d) 120 minutes. All subjects will receive the conventional therapy normally provided within each centre. On Day 16, outcome measures will be made. The experimental intervention, MTS therapy will be individualised for each subject from a standardised schedule of techniques within treatment categories including: passive movements, massage; specific sensory input; and, functional movement. The measurement battery will be: a) efficacy, Motricity Index Arm Section and the Action Research Arm Test; b) adverse events, presence of upper limb pain and decrease in Motricity Index score; and c) Functional MRI (London subjects), T1 weighted anatomical images and T2\* weighted MRI transverse echo-planar images undertaking these studies with both sensory and motor paradigms where feasible.

Analysis Analysis for efficacy and adverse events will be conducted using the Chi-squared test for trend or linear regression as appropriate. The results will be combined to determine the most appropriate dose of MTS. Imaging data will be processed using Statistical Parametric Mapping and then analysed statistically using a least mean squares fit of the model to the data to determine regions of significant activation for each session.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Behavioural

Conventional UK physical therapy (Con UK PT)

Group Type OTHER

Conventional UK physical therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Con UK PT + MTS

Con UK PT + 30/60 or 120 minutes MTS

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Con UK PT + Mobilisation & tactile stimulation (MTS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Con UK PT + Mobilisation \& Tactile Stimulation (MTS) which is further randomised to 30, 60 or 120 mins/day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional UK physical therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Con UK PT + Mobilisation & tactile stimulation (MTS)

Con UK PT + Mobilisation \& Tactile Stimulation (MTS) which is further randomised to 30, 60 or 120 mins/day

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Con UK PT Con UK PT + MTS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have suffered an infarct or haemorrhage in the anterior cerebral circulation, confirmed by neuroimaging, 8 to 84 days before recruitment
* Have a paralysed or severely paretic upper limb as measured by a score of 61/100 or less on the Motricity Index Arm Section17

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically important pain affecting the upper arm or shoulder when recruited to this study
* Visible upper limb movement deficits attributable to pathology other than stroke
* Unable to follow a 1-stage command using their non-paretic upper limb (ie severe communication or other cognitive deficits precluding ability to participate in MTS).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St George's, University of London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Valerie M Pomeroy, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

St George's, University of London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust

Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

St Thomas' Foundation Hospital NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TSA 2005/03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stroke Motor Recovery for the Hand and Fingers
NCT06604143 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA