Self-directed Adapted Gaming Exercises for Stroke Survivors
NCT ID: NCT04475692
Last Updated: 2023-10-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
55 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-01
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigation of Acceptable Dose of Mobilisation and Tactile Stimulation to Enhance Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke
NCT00360997
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Bilateral Movement-based Computer Games Training to Improve Motor Function of Upper Limb and Quality of Life in Sub-acute Stroke Patient
NCT03618732
Upper Arm Reahabilitation After Stroke and Video Game
NCT01554449
Evaluation of a Video-ludic Re-education of the Paretic Upper Limb in Chronic Hemipartic Patients Post Cerebral Vascular Accident
NCT03166020
Intensive Upper Limb Training in Chronic Stroke
NCT05527262
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Design: Interventional (clinical trial). A multicentre pilot RCT, parallel design, comparing intervention group (self-selected dose of self-directed technology-based UL exercise as an adjunct to conventional care) with a control group receiving conventional care only. A mixed methods research design will be implemented. This will be an assessor-blinded protocol, due to the nature of the intervention, participants cannot be blinded. This will be an internal pilot, if no changes are made to the protocol and additional funding is secured, the data from this pilot work will be used be used as part of an adequately powered RCT.
Aims: To test research design considerations in preparation for a definitive multicentre RCT. To explore the hypothesis that stroke survivors with UL weakness will engage in self-directed exercise (without direct professional supervision) as an adjunct to conventional care and demonstrate significant improvement in UL outcomes when provided with an adapted mobile rehabilitation system, compared with a control group participating in conventional care only.
Outcome Measures: The primary end point outcome will be based on intention to treat analysis on the Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FM-UE) at 6months post randomisation, controlled for baseline.
Additional/ secondary outcome measures will include: The Action Arm Research Test (ARAT), Apple watch activity monitors (implementing tailor-made machine learning methods to interpret UL movement data), Barthel Index (BI), Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS), Stanford Fatigue Visual Numeric Scale (SFVNS).
Assessments administered for the purpose of sample description (sub group analysis) and stratification will include: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Edinburgh Handedness Scale (EHS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), Likert scale participant feedback forms (devised for the purposes of the current study). For purposively sampled sub-groups of participants, sub studies will explore bilateral naturalistic UL activity patterns in free living (intervention and control groups) and qualitative interviews will examine the mechanisms of behavioral change as relevant to the intervention (intervention group only).
Population: A convenience sample of 72 stroke survivors will be screened and consented by delegated health care practitioners (HCPs) or researchers at participating sites (i.e Co-Investigators (Co-Is)). Co-Is will also be invited to complete end-point feedback forms.
Eligibility: Participants will be 18yrs or over, acute/sub-acute stroke survivors with new UL impairment, fitting inclusion criteria specified herewith.
Duration: Participants' enrolment in the study will last up to 6months. The study recruitment phase will open for a total of 12months. The overall research period, including analysis and write up is anticipated to last 21months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Conventional care will continue.
Participants (and proxy, where relevant) will be trained to use the intervention platform (GripAble). Participants will be loaned a GripAble device and advised to continue a self-selected training dose throughout the intervention period.
Weekly follow-up phone calls will be conducted, remote tech support will be available. Adherence with the intervention will be remotely monitored via an inbuilt data capture system.
At 3months post stroke, the intervention period will conclude, outcome measures will be implemented. Participants will be invited to complete a post intervention survey and interview. A purposive sample of participants will be invited to participate in an UL activity monitoring sub-study.
At 6months post stroke, follow-up outcome measures will be implemented. Participants will be invited to take part in a research implementation feedback survey.
Repetitive, task-specific upper limb practice
A self-directed upper limb intervention (implementing a self-selected dose). This intervention uses an adapted upper limb rehabilitation system to support repetitive upper limb training for stroke survivors.
Conventional care
Conventional care is the standard care offered to stroke patients in their respective settings. In this context it is guided by Royal College of Physicians (2016). For the purposes of this work, conventional care encompasses any rehabilitation or support services accessed by participants within the primary or secondary care setting, including private therapy services, charity-led exercise groups etc. Conventional care will not be specified in the context of this work, as it is complex in nature and varies between settings.
Control
Baseline data collection and outcome measures will be completed.
Conventional care will continue, no restrictions/specifications will be placed on this.
At 3months post stroke, UL outcome measures will be implemented. A purposive sample of participants will be invited to participate in an UL activity monitoring sub-study.
At 6months post stroke, follow-up UL outcome measures will be implemented. Participants will be invited to take part in a research implementation feedback survey.
Conventional care
Conventional care is the standard care offered to stroke patients in their respective settings. In this context it is guided by Royal College of Physicians (2016). For the purposes of this work, conventional care encompasses any rehabilitation or support services accessed by participants within the primary or secondary care setting, including private therapy services, charity-led exercise groups etc. Conventional care will not be specified in the context of this work, as it is complex in nature and varies between settings.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repetitive, task-specific upper limb practice
A self-directed upper limb intervention (implementing a self-selected dose). This intervention uses an adapted upper limb rehabilitation system to support repetitive upper limb training for stroke survivors.
Conventional care
Conventional care is the standard care offered to stroke patients in their respective settings. In this context it is guided by Royal College of Physicians (2016). For the purposes of this work, conventional care encompasses any rehabilitation or support services accessed by participants within the primary or secondary care setting, including private therapy services, charity-led exercise groups etc. Conventional care will not be specified in the context of this work, as it is complex in nature and varies between settings.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stroke diagnosis (can be first or subsequent stroke, unilateral haemorrhagic or ischemic) 4 weeks max post stroke at time of recruitment.
* Can communicate in English, that is, sufficient for completion of intervention and outcome measures. It is advisable that a decision to include or exclude those with significant expressive or receptive communication impairment should be made following consultation with the treating speech and language therapist (SLT) to ensure all reasonable accommodations are made to support participation.
* UL motor deficit post stroke (bilateral/unilateral) (according to National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) item 5), distal UL power \>1 /5 on the Oxford Rating Scale (Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale) or voluntary finger extension of the thumb and/or two or more fingers of the affected hand (to 10° or more). The presence of sensory impairment (including neglect syndrome) or movement disorder (apraxia) is not a contraindication to enrolment as long as there is a concurrent motor deficit (as described above).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients enrolled in clinical trials that contraindicate co-enrolment.
* Patients presenting with unstable medical conditions/medical contraindications as determined by treating medical consultant (these patients may be approached at a later date should their condition improve).
* Patients with uncontrolled photosensitive epilepsy/Other neurological symptoms that may be exacerbated by required focus on light emitting diode (LED) screen/moving object on screen).
* Those registered blind/with uncompensated/uncorrected visual deficits.
* Behavioural/affective dysfunction which could influence the ability of the person to engage with the research protocol and/or pose risk to the participating researchers (in circumstances such as follow-up community visits).
* Other concomitant neurological disorders affecting upper extremity motor function (Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Injury, Brachial Plexus or Radial Nerve Injury).
* Unremitting arm pain at rest.
* Pre-existing UL impairment with known and significant disruption to range of motion, motor or functional performance (fracture, arthritic changes, other known musculoskeletal problems).
* Skin condition apparent on the ventral UE such that might place participant at risk of irritation in the context of repeated physical contact (such as that associated with the intervention).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Southampton
OTHER
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jane Burridge
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Southampton
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Paul Bentley
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Broderick M, Burridge J, Demain S, Johnson L, Brereton J, O'Shea R, Bentley P. Multicentre pilot randomised control trial of a self-directed exergaming intervention for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation: research protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):e077121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077121.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20CX5959
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.