Substrates for Post-Stroke Arm Rehabilitation

NCT ID: NCT06998485

Last Updated: 2025-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-01

Study Completion Date

2030-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Difficulty moving the arm is very common and a major cause of disability after stroke. Although rehabilitation therapies (i.e., occupational and physical therapy) are the most common treatments used to improve arm motor function, it remains unknown how therapy actually changes brain pathways after stroke. This project seeks to generate fundamental knowledge about brain pathways that allow people to move their arm after stroke and how these pathways change with rehabilitation; we expect this knowledge to translate to new therapies to reduce stroke-related disability.

We plan to enroll N = 50 patients with moderate to severe difficulty moving their arm after ischemic or hemorrhage stroke during the subacute period (3 to 6 months post stroke) into either 30 hours over 6 weeks of Arm Basis Training (a protocolized form of occupational therapy targeting motor control) or usual care. We will perform kinematic motor assessments, neuroimaging, and neurophysiology before and after therapy in order to test the hypothesis that intensive, target training improves arm motor control and induces corresponding anatomical and physiological changes of associated brain pathways.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Strokes commonly damage motor pathways in the brain which leads to "hemiparesis", the collective term given to the syndrome of motor dysfunction after stroke. Upper extremity hemiparesis is comprised of both loss of abilities (negative signs- weakness and loss of dexterity or fractionated motor control) and intrusion of abnormal movements (positive signs- spasticity, abnormal resting postures, and synergies).

Recent work from our group and others shows that components of motor hemiparesis are dissociable: they can be separated and each map onto different and specific brain pathways. In this proposal, we focus on one specific component of post-stroke hemiparesis: proximal upper extremity motor control. Proximal upper extremity motor control can be measured as the ability to individuate and coordinate shoulder and elbow movements. We ask (i) where does proximal upper extremity motor control localize in the post-stroke brain? (ii) can we improve motor control with a specific form of targeted, high-dose, high-intensity therapy? And (iii) does therapy lead to corresponding changes in anatomy and physiology of brain pathways? Our central hypothesis is that intensive, targeted training improves proximal upper extremity motor control and induces corresponding anatomical and physiological changes of the corticospinal tract. To test this hypothesis, we will conduct three specific aims: (1) Determine baseline relationships between the corticospinal tract and proximal upper extremity motor control, (2) Define changes in proximal upper extremity motor control induced by targeted rehabilitation training, and (3) Define changes in corticospinal tract anatomy and physiology induced by targeted rehabilitation training. We leverage a clinical trial design of N = 50 patients with moderate-severe hemiparesis randomized to two groups: Arm Basis Training (a protocolized form of occupational therapy targeting motor control) versus usual care. Before and after six weeks of therapy, all patients will undergo kinematic assessment of motor control, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging to assess corticospinal tract axon density, and transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess corticospinal excitability. Dr. Lin, an acute care neurologist with neurorehabilitation and neuroscience training and the Director of the MGH Neurorecovery Clinic, will lead the project and bring together a world-class team of investigators and consultants, supported by the rich and multidisciplinary environment at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and collaborating institutions. This project is a mechanistic and hypothesis-driven investigation of the neuroanatomic and neurophysiologic signatures of a specific component of hemiparesis, proximal upper extremity motor control, and its response to targeted rehabilitation. The unique integration of kinematics, neuroanatomy, and neurophysiology in patients after stroke will transform stroke rehabilitation with a precision approach that targets brain structure and function.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Rehabilitation Stroke Neurorecovery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Mechanistic randomized controlled trial of arm basis training (a protocolized form of occupational therapy targeting proximal upper extremity motor control) versus usual care occupational therapy
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm Basis Training

This program is a systematic training regimen specifically designed to improve proximal motor control for patients with severe upper extremity hemiparesis. The core principles of the Arm Basis Training Program focus on rebuilding the fundamental capacity for specific and selective motor control before progressing to more complex motor patterns.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Arm Basis Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This program is a systematic training regimen specifically designed to improve proximal motor control for patients with severe upper extremity hemiparesis. The core principles of the Arm Basis Training Program focus on rebuilding the fundamental capacity for specific and selective motor control before progressing to more complex motor patterns.

Usual Care Occupational Therapy

Usual care occupational therapy. Participants will be asked to keep logs of the therapy they receive.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arm Basis Training

This program is a systematic training regimen specifically designed to improve proximal motor control for patients with severe upper extremity hemiparesis. The core principles of the Arm Basis Training Program focus on rebuilding the fundamental capacity for specific and selective motor control before progressing to more complex motor patterns.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* first time unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke occurring within the 3-6 months
* upper extremity motor impairment as measured by the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA) Score \<= 44
* ability to participate in a 6-week intensive upper extremity intervention in English as determined by a licensed occupational therapist.

Exclusion Criteria

* bilateral stroke
* unstable medical status affecting functional status
* pre-stroke upper extremity injury or conditions that limited use
* visual or auditory impairment limiting ability to participate in study procedures
* significant aphasia (NIHSS sub-item 9 \> 1) or cognitive (NIHSS 1a or 1b or

1c \> 1) deficits
* known or expected inability to maintain follow-up through the study intervention and post- assessment
* contraindications to MRI
* contraindications to TMS
* known history of uncontrolled seizure disorder.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Lin

Neurologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David J Lin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Caroline Lambert, BA

Role: CONTACT

617-726-1311

Julie DiCarlo, MS

Role: CONTACT

617-726-1311

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01NS142153

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2025P000641

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of Robot Assisted Neuro-Rehabilitation
NCT01253018 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Multicenter Rehabilitation Study in Acute Stroke
NCT00849303 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3