Comparison of Two High-intensity Gait Training Interventions on Contraversive Pushing Behaviors in Individuals Poststroke

NCT ID: NCT04550039

Last Updated: 2024-03-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of two high-intensity gait training interventions on contraversive pushing behaviors in individuals poststroke in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting. We will also evaluate the effect of these interventions on functional mobility, strength, balance, and endurance. Furthermore, we intend to measure therapist burden when mobilizing individuals with contraversive pushing behaviors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High-intensity gait training is strongly supported in individuals poststroke to facilitate neuroplastic changes in the brain in order to maximize the recovery of functional independence. Individuals with contraversive pushing behaviors (CPB) poststroke are difficult to mobilize as a result of tilted posture with significant balance impairments, a tendency to push toward their hemiparetic side, and resistance to external correction. CPB has been reported in 12-18% of individuals receiving stroke rehabilitation and often leads to longer lengths of stay, poorer functional outcomes, and institutionalized discharge locations compared to individuals poststroke without CPB.

High quality evidence guiding physical therapy intervention, specifically gait training, in individuals with CPB is scarce. Traditional therapeutic interventions in individuals with CPB consists of progressing functional mobility while orienting to midline with various forms of visual and tactile feedback. To further guide best practice in this population, we plan to investigate the effect of two high-intensity gait training interventions on CPB in 10 individuals poststroke in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting over the course of one year.

Individuals from the inpatient stroke unit at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab will be recruited and placed into one of two intervention groups. Intervention for group one will consist of body-weight-supported treadmill training + overground gait training. Intervention for group two will consist of gait training in the EksoNR exoskeleton + overground gait training. The commercially available EksoNR is approved by the FDA for use in individuals with stroke diagnoses. We will also evaluate the effect of these interventions on functional outcomes including mobility, strength, balance, walking speed, and walking endurance in addition to measuring therapist burden when mobilizing individuals with CPB.

Both groups will receive their specified gait training intervention three sessions a week for at least three weeks until they discharge with the goal of maximizing the number of steps within a 60 minute session. Gait training interventions will be progressed to challenge individuals as appropriate in order to reach 70-85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate. A fourth session will be utilized to assess weekly outcome measures as part of the standard of care at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. There will be no restrictions set on therapy delivered outside of these intervention training sessions as individuals will be getting other therapies each day as the standard of care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Body-weight-supported treadmill training

Participants complete prescribed gait training program for at least three weeks or until they discharge.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Body-weight-supported treadmill

Intervention Type DEVICE

Gait training performed on treadmill with overhead harness providing necessary body-weight-support with assistance from trained physical therapist

EksoNR exoskeleton

Participants complete prescribed gait training program for at least three weeks or until they discharge.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ekso Bionics EksoNR exoskeleton

Intervention Type DEVICE

Gait training performed overground in EksoNR exoskeleton with assistance from trained physical therapist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Body-weight-supported treadmill

Gait training performed on treadmill with overhead harness providing necessary body-weight-support with assistance from trained physical therapist

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ekso Bionics EksoNR exoskeleton

Gait training performed overground in EksoNR exoskeleton with assistance from trained physical therapist

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-80 years old
* Unilateral, supratentorial ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within the past six months
* Medical clearance from primary medical team (signed Medical Clearance form)
* Contraversive pushing behaviors as determined by a score of \>0 on the Scale for Contraversive Pushing
* Adequate cognitive function as determined by the NIH scale: score ≤1 on question 1b and score =0 on question 1c
* Informed consent provided by participant or power of attorney
* English speaking

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe aphasia limiting ability to express needs or discomfort verbally or nonverbally
* Severe behavioral neglect as determined by a score of ≥ 21 on Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) via the Kessler Foundation-Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP)16
* History of prior stroke
* Concurrent neurologic condition (i.e PD, TBI, MS, etc.)
* History of peripheral nerve injury
* Joint contracture or significant spasticity in the lower limbs (Modified Ashworth Scale ≥3)
* Severe knee, hip, or ankle osteoarthritis
* Severe osteoporosis as indicated by physician medical clearance
* Open wounds on surfaces in contact with exoskeleton or harness
* Unstable spine or unhealed fractures
* Weight bearing precautions
* Unresolved deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
* Concurrent participation in other lower limb research studies that according to the PI is likely to affect study outcome or confound results
* Pregnancy


* Weight \>220 lbs (100 kg)
* Height below 60 inches or above 76 inches
* Standing hip width of approximately 18 inches or more
* Joint contractures or range of motion deficits that limit normal range of motion during ambulation
* Knee flexion contracture greater than 12°
* Hip flexion contracture greater than 17°
* Inability to achieve 0° neutral ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexion up to 12°
* Bilateral hip flexion less than 110°
* Leg length discrepancy
* Greater than 0.5 in. (1.27 cm) for upper legs
* Greater than 0.75 in. (1.91 cm) for lower legs
* Active heterotopic ossification
* Significant spasticity in the lower limbs (Modified Ashworth Scale ≥3)
* High anxiety or claustrophobia
* Clostridium difficile or other gastrointestinal isolation precautions
* Colostomy
* Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
* Lower limb prosthesis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Arun Jayaraman, PT, PhD

Research Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arun Jayaraman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00213155

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Strength Training and Stroke
NCT00629005 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Ventilatory Muscle Training in Stroke
NCT02828943 COMPLETED PHASE3
Safety and Feasibility of ExoNET
NCT05180812 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA