Effect of Hybrid Robot-assisted Training Using End-effector and Exoskeleton Devices in Distal Upper Extremity After Stroke:Motor Control, Motor and Daily Function, Quality of Life

NCT ID: NCT05226988

Last Updated: 2022-03-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-10-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the immediate and long-term effects of hybrid robot-assisted training (Hybrid-RT), exoskeleton robot-assisted training (Exo-RT), end-effector robot-assisted training (EE-RT), and conventional training on stroke patients' motor performance, daily life functions, quality of life, and self-efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, and most stroke survivors have chronic upper limb dysfunction, which affects participation in activities of daily living. In addition to conventional rehabilitation training, robot-assisted training has been advocated as a contemporary approach of hand function training. Robotic devices can be categorized into exoskeleton and end-effector types based on their mechanical design. However, previous studies did not reach an agreement on the effectiveness of two types of robot-assisted training. The study firstly proposes a hybrid robot-assisted training program, which combines two types of robotic systems, to enhance the effectiveness of robot-assisted training and provide a new approach for motor training of upper limb in stroke patients. Secondly, the relative effects of the two types of robot-assisted training will be compared. The purpose of this study is to examine the immediate and long-term effects of hybrid robot-assisted training , exoskeleton robot-assisted training , end-effector robot-assisted training , and conventional training on stroke patients' motor performance, daily life functions, quality of life, and self-efficacy. The study will recruit stroke patients and randomly assign them to the hybrid robot-assisted training, exoskeleton robot-assisted training, end-effector robot-assisted training, and conventional training groups. Each participant will receive training 3 sessions a week for 6 consecutive weeks. Participants will be assessed at baseline, after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. Repeated measures of analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the changes within each intervention group at three evaluation times and to compare the differences between the four intervention groups. In order to understand the motor learning effects after receiving different interventions, the investigator use kinematic analysis to investigate the movement control mechanism of upper limb movements. The findings of this study will build the evidence-based foundation for bridging the gap between basic science and clinical application.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hybrid-RT

hybrid robot-assisted training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

robot-assisted

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants received the 18-session robot-assisted intervention 3 sessions a week for 6 consecutive weeks. Each session consisted of 20-minute continuous passive motion, 20-minute active motion practice, and 30-minute task-oriented practice.

Exo-RT

exoskeleton robot-assisted training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

robot-assisted

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants received the 18-session robot-assisted intervention 3 sessions a week for 6 consecutive weeks. Each session consisted of 20-minute continuous passive motion, 20-minute active motion practice, and 30-minute task-oriented practice.

EE-RT

end-effector robot-assisted training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

robot-assisted

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants received the 18-session robot-assisted intervention 3 sessions a week for 6 consecutive weeks. Each session consisted of 20-minute continuous passive motion, 20-minute active motion practice, and 30-minute task-oriented practice.

conventional training groups

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional rehabilitation intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants received the 18-session conventional rehabilitation intervention 3 sessions a week for 6 consecutive weeks. The intervention consisted of warm up including range of motion exercise, and strengthening exercise followed by task-oriented training for activities of daily living.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

robot-assisted

Participants received the 18-session robot-assisted intervention 3 sessions a week for 6 consecutive weeks. Each session consisted of 20-minute continuous passive motion, 20-minute active motion practice, and 30-minute task-oriented practice.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional rehabilitation intervention

Participants received the 18-session conventional rehabilitation intervention 3 sessions a week for 6 consecutive weeks. The intervention consisted of warm up including range of motion exercise, and strengthening exercise followed by task-oriented training for activities of daily living.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Stroke more than 3 months.
* Modified Ashworth Scale proximal part ≤ 3, Modified Ashworth Scale distal part ≤ 2, and no serious muscle spasms.
* The myoelectric signal can be detected to activate the instrument
* Unilateral paresis (FMA score\<60)
* No serious cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini Mental State Exam score \> 24)
* Can provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Other neurological disease
* Complete sense of body defect
* Inability to understand instructions
* current participation in any other research
* Botulinum Toxin injection within 3 months
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chang Gung Memotial Hospital

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ching-yi Wu, ScD

Role: CONTACT

#886-3-2118800 ext. 5761

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ching-Yi Wu, ScD

Role: primary

+886-3-2118800 ext. 5761

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202101742B0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.