Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT04102371

Last Updated: 2025-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

8800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-25

Study Completion Date

2026-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objectives of this multicenter pragmatic clinical trial are to compare the effectiveness and relative safety of balanced fluid resuscitation versus 0.9% "normal" saline in children with septic shock, including whether balanced fluid resuscitation can reduce progression of kidney injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately 5,000 children die from septic shock each year in the United States (US); thousands more die worldwide. Most children admitted with sepsis receive initial resuscitation in an emergency department (ED), where septic shock remains one of the most critical of illnesses treated by ED clinicians. Sepsis is also the most expensive hospital condition in the US, and the most common cause of pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). While all crystalloid fluids help to reverse shock, the most effective and safest type of crystalloid fluid resuscitation is unknown.

Crystalloid fluids can be categorized as non-buffered (most commonly 0.9% normal saline \[NS\]) or buffered/balanced fluids (BF). In the US, the most common BF is lactated Ringer's (LR), but other example include PlasmaLyte. NS and BF are inexpensive, stable at room temperature, and nearly universally available with identical storage volumes and dosing strategies. Notably, both are also of proven clinical benefit in septic shock and have extensive clinical experience for use in fluid resuscitation of critically ill patients. However, despite data suggesting that BF resuscitation may have superior efficacy and safety, NS remains the most commonly used fluid largely based on historical precedent.

To definitively test the comparative effectiveness of NS and BF, a well-powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) is necessary. A large pragmatic randomized trial embedded within everyday clinical practice provides a cost-efficient and generalizable approach to inform clinicians about best comparative effectiveness of common therapies. Data from a prior single-center feasibility study demonstrated that a pragmatic randomized clinical trial of NS versus BF for children with septic shock presenting to an emergency department is feasible and can be successfully carried out by embedding simple study procedures within routine clinical practice. This multi-center study that will now test for differential clinical effects, as part of a definitive comparative effectiveness trial, of NS versus BF for crystalloid resuscitation of pediatric septic shock.

This multicenter phase trial will include enrollment and study procedures across 30+ US and international sites to compare the effectiveness and relative safety of NS versus BF (LR and PlasmaLyte) for crystalloid resuscitation of children with septic shock. The primary endpoint is major adverse kidney events within 30 days along with other secondary clinical, safety, and kidney biomarker endpoints.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock Septic

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Sepsis Septic Shock Fluid resuscitation Saline Balanced Fluid Mortality Crystalloid PlasmaLyte Lactated Ringer's Kidney injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multi-center, open-label, randomized pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Balanced fluids (BF)

Balanced fluids (BF), including Lactated Ringer's and Plasma-Lyte (PL), will be administered to patients randomized to the experimental arm. BF will be used for all fluid boluses and maintenance fluids (supplemental electrolytes are allowed) from time immediately after randomization through 11:59 pm of the next calendar day. The determination of when to give fluid, how much fluid to give, how fast to give fluid, and what access to use to administer fluid will remain at the discretion of the treating team.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lactated Ringer

Intervention Type DRUG

LR is a sterile, nonpyrogenic "balanced" solution used for fluid and electrolyte replenishment via intravenous or intraosseous administration. Each 100 mL of LR contains 600 mg sodium chloride (NaCl), 310 mg of sodium lactate (C3H5NaO3), 30 mg of potassium chloride (KCl), and 20 mg of calcium chloride (CaCl2 · 2H20) with an approximate potential of hydrogen (pH) of 6.5 (6.0 to 7.5).

Plasma-lyte

Intervention Type DRUG

PL is a sterile, nonpyrogenic isotonic solution in a single dose container for intravenous administration. Each 100 mL contains 526 mg of Sodium Chloride, USP (NaCl); 502 mg of Sodium Gluconate (C6H11NaO7); 368 mg of Sodium Acetate Trihydrate, USP (C2H3NaO2•3H2O); 37 mg of Potassium Chloride, USP (KCl); and 30 mg of Magnesium Chloride, USP (MgCl2•6H2O). It contains no antimicrobial agents. The pH is adjusted with sodium hydroxide. The pH is 7.4 (6.5 to 8.0).

0.9% "Normal" Saline Fluid (NS)

0.9% "normal" saline (NS) fluid will be administered to patients randomized to the active comparator (control) arm. NS will be used for all fluid boluses and maintenance fluids (supplemental electrolytes are allowed) from time immediately after randomization through 11:59 pm of the next calendar day. The determination of when to give fluid, how much fluid to give, how fast to give fluid, and what access to use to administer fluid will remain at the discretion of the treating team.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline solution is an "unbalanced" crystalloid solution containing 154 mEq/L of sodium and 154 milliequivalent (mEq/L) of chloride.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lactated Ringer

LR is a sterile, nonpyrogenic "balanced" solution used for fluid and electrolyte replenishment via intravenous or intraosseous administration. Each 100 mL of LR contains 600 mg sodium chloride (NaCl), 310 mg of sodium lactate (C3H5NaO3), 30 mg of potassium chloride (KCl), and 20 mg of calcium chloride (CaCl2 · 2H20) with an approximate potential of hydrogen (pH) of 6.5 (6.0 to 7.5).

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal Saline

Normal saline solution is an "unbalanced" crystalloid solution containing 154 mEq/L of sodium and 154 milliequivalent (mEq/L) of chloride.

Intervention Type DRUG

Plasma-lyte

PL is a sterile, nonpyrogenic isotonic solution in a single dose container for intravenous administration. Each 100 mL contains 526 mg of Sodium Chloride, USP (NaCl); 502 mg of Sodium Gluconate (C6H11NaO7); 368 mg of Sodium Acetate Trihydrate, USP (C2H3NaO2•3H2O); 37 mg of Potassium Chloride, USP (KCl); and 30 mg of Magnesium Chloride, USP (MgCl2•6H2O). It contains no antimicrobial agents. The pH is adjusted with sodium hydroxide. The pH is 7.4 (6.5 to 8.0).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LR 0.9% Saline NS PL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males or females age \>2 months to \<18 years
2. Clinician concern for septic shock, operationalized as:

1. a "positive" ED sepsis alert confirmed by a physician OR
2. physician decision to treat for septic shock OR
3. a physician diagnosis of septic shock requiring parenteral antibiotics and fluid resuscitation
3. Administration of at least one IV/Intraosseous (IO) fluid bolus for resuscitation and additional fluid deemed likely to be necessary to treat poor perfusion, or clinician judgment that \>1 fluid bolus is highly likely to be required. Poor perfusion is defined as physician's judgement of hypotension or abnormal (either "flash" or "prolonged") capillary refill.
4. Receipt of ≤40 mL/kg IV/IO total crystalloid fluid prior to randomization
5. Parental/guardian permission (informed consent) if time permits; otherwise, Exception from informed consent (EFIC) criteria met

Exclusion Criteria

1. Treating physician judges that patient's condition deems it unsafe to administer either NS or BF (since patients will be equally likely to receive NS or BF at time of study enrollment), including:

1. Clinical suspicion for impending brain herniation
2. Known hyperkalemia, defined as non-hemolyzed whole blood or plasma/serum potassium \> 6 mEq/L, based on data available at or before patient meets criteria for study enrollment
3. Known hypercalcemia, defined as plasma/serum total calcium \>12 mg/dL or whole blood ionized calcium \>1.35 mmol/L, based on data available at or before patient meets criteria for study enrollment
4. Known acute fulminant hepatic failure, defined as plasma/serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>10,000 U/L or total bilirubin \>12.0 mg/dL, based on data available at or before patient meets criteria for study enrollment
5. Known history of severe hepatic impairment, defined as cirrhosis, "liver failure", or awaiting transplant
6. Known history of severe renal impairment, defined as peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis
7. Known metabolic/mitochondrial disorder, inborn error of metabolism, or primary mineralocorticoid deficiency as reported by participant, legally authorized representative (LAR) or accompanying caregiver, or as listed in the medical record
8. Other concern for which the treating clinician deems it unsafe to administer either NS or LR
2. Known pregnancy determined by routine history disclosed by patient and/or accompanying acquaintance.
3. Known prisoner
4. Known allergy to a crystalloid fluid
5. Indication of declined consent to participate based on presence of an opt-out bracelet with appropriate messaging embossed into the bracelet, the presence of the patient's name on an opt-out list that will be kept up-to-date and checked prior to randomization, or verbal "opt-out" prior to enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital Colorado

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital and Health System Foundation, Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Medical Center Dallas

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Louis Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baylor College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's National Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hasbro Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nationwide Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Primary Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seattle Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kidz First Hospital Middlemore

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queensland Children's Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Westmead Children's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sydney Children's Hospitals Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Perth Children's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Starship Children's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Monash Children's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Women's and Children's Hospital, Australia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Darwin Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Virginia Commonwealth University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alberta Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

British Columbia Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Univeritaire Sainte Justine

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

IWK Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jim Pattison Children's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kingston Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McMaster Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stollery Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Children's Hospital of Winnipeg

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pennsylvania Department of Health

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Townsville University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Frances Balamuth

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fran Balamuth, MD PhD MSCE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Attending Physician, Emergency Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UC Davis: University of California, Davis

Davis, California, United States

Site Status

CHLA: Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Colorado: University of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Atlanta

Emory, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Lurie Children's: Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

CS Mott Children's Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Columbia: New York-Presbyterian Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hasbro Children's Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Dallas Children's: Children's Medical Center Dallas/UT southwestern

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Primary Children's: University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Children's National Medical Center

Columbia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee (MCW): Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Balamuth F, Kittick M, McBride P, Woodford AL, Vestal N, Casper TC, Metheney M, Smith K, Atkin NJ, Baren JM, Dean JM, Kuppermann N, Weiss SL. Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis: The PRoMPT BOLUS Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Feasibility Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(12):1346-1356. doi: 10.1111/acem.13815. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31183919 (View on PubMed)

Weiss SL, Balamuth F, Long E, Thompson GC, Hayes KL, Katcoff H, Cook M, Tsemberis E, Hickey CP, Williams A, Williamson-Urquhart S, Borland ML, Dalziel SR, Gelbart B, Freedman SB, Babl FE, Huang J, Kuppermann N; Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis (PRoMPT BOLUS) Investigators of the PECARN, PERC, and PREDICT Networks. PRagMatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced vs nOrmaL Saline FlUid in Sepsis: study protocol for the PRoMPT BOLUS randomized interventional trial. Trials. 2021 Nov 6;22(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05717-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34742327 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HD101528

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

19-016484

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id