Surveillance of High-grade Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Tumours Using the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor
NCT ID: NCT04100733
Last Updated: 2023-06-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
392 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-01
2027-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Longitudinal Bladder Cancer Study for Tumour Recurrence
NCT05080998
A Multi-National Study In Bladder Cancer Patients to Detect Recurrences After TURB (Trans-urethral Resection of the Bladder) Earlier With the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor Assay (ANTICIPATE X)
NCT03664258
Diagnostic Performance Evaluation Study of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor Test.
NCT04647981
Xpert Bladder Monitor: a Non-Invasive Follow-Up Tool for Detecting Relapse in High Grade or High Risk Bladder Cancer
NCT06751667
Clinical Evaluation of a Test for Monitoring the Recurrence of Bladder Cancer
NCT03125460
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Follow-up schedules based on risk of recurrence. The histological grade, number of tumors, tumor size, T-stage, recurrence-rate and presence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) is used to estimate risk of recurrence according to the EORTC-scoring system. Based on the risk stratification, different follow-up schedules after initial TUR-B are planned. High risk tumors are followed-up with flexible cystoscopy and urinary cytology every four months until two recurrence-free years, whereas low and intermediate risk tumors are followed utilizing the 4-8-12 model where intervals between follow up are increased for patients without recurrence until 5 disease-free years.3 The evidence behind these follow-up schedules is not based on high level evidence and research but rather on tradition and 'clinical experience'.
Clinical challenge of current follow-up schedules The majority of patients with HG tumors will have recurrence despite treatment, especially within the two first years after diagnosis. Moreover, many patients will receive lifelong follow-up cystoscopy and urinary cytology tests. Follow-up schedules are costly due to many visits at the hospital for flexible cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and treatment. A micro-costing analysis performed by the Urological Research Unit at Aarhus University Hospital prior to initiation of the current study, has shown that the total expense in relation to flexible cystoscopy in the outpatient clinic is approximately 315 EUR per examination (Appendix 1). Equally important to frequency and cost of follow-up, every follow-up visit is associated with patient discomfort, pain, risk of infections, and strictures of the urethra.6 Each cystoscopy carries a 15% risk of complications. Nearly 1,500 cystoscopies are carried out in HG patients in Central Denmark Region each year, resulting in approximately 240 complications each year, with cystitis being the most common complication. Furthermore, flexible cystoscopy is not always reliable in terms of diagnosing recurrences and CIS.7-9
Urinary biomarkers A proposed alternative to flexible cystoscopy in the detection of recurrent NMBIC is non-invasive molecular urinary markers that detect mRNA, protein or DNA from selected genes relevant for bladder cancer in urine samples. Several studies have been prospectively validated and shown high sensitivity and specificity for urinary markers.10,11 Recently, the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor test was shown by Valenberg et al.12 to have a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 76% for HG disease and similarly D'Elia et al.13 showed a specificity of 77% and sensitivity of 46% for a cohort of mainly LG patients. However, studies have until now focused mainly on detection of NMIBC in patients with incident tumors, which are most often larger and more easily diagnosed with urinary biomarkers than recurrences.14 To our knowledge, no studies have so far substituted cystoscopies for urinary biomarkers in a randomized controlled setting. Thus, the need for high level evidence regarding the use of urinary biomarkers for surveillance of NMIBC is still there.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Study subjects will cohere to current clinical guidelines for follow-up regimes of HG NMIBC with flexible cystoscopy and cytology every four months for a period of two years.
Flexible cystoscopy (WL/NBI) and urinary cytology
Adhering to current danish guidelines for follow-up of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Intervention
Patients in the interventional arm will be followed at 4, 8, 16 and 20 months after inclusion with Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor-test (and urinary cytology) instead of flexible cystoscopy.
Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor
Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor detects mRNA fragments from 5 genes frequently overexpressed in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor
Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor detects mRNA fragments from 5 genes frequently overexpressed in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Flexible cystoscopy (WL/NBI) and urinary cytology
Adhering to current danish guidelines for follow-up of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to understand the Participant Information sheet orally and in writing
* Signed Informed Consent Form
* Is, according to the investigator's judgement, able to comply with the trial protocol
* Previously diagnosed with high grade NMIBC Recurrence free at the time of inclusion detected by flexible cystoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
* T1 tumor where re-resection has not been performed
* CIS or invasive tumor within 3 months before randomization
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cepheid
INDUSTRY
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Professor, consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital of West Jutland
Holstebro, Danmark, Denmark
Aarhus University Hospital
Århus N, , Denmark
Zealand University Hospital
Roskilde, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SEALS Xpert
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.