The Cxbladder Rule-out of Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT03673202

Last Updated: 2019-08-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-26

Study Completion Date

2020-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This observational study is designed to collect urine and relevant clinical information from patients who have a known diagnosis of bladder cancer and currently on clinically driven surveillance. The study aims to compare the urine test to the flexible cystoscopy procedure (which the patient is already scheduled).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are approximately 360,000 new cases of bladder cancer diagnosed globally each year. In addition, this disease is responsible for 145,000 deaths annually (Parkin et al 2005). Treatments for this cancer range from transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) for low stage, non-invasive tumors, to the more drastic option of radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for those tumors that are found to have invaded into the muscularis propria (Parekh et al 2006). Currently, the standard of care for diagnosing bladder cancer involves a combination of flexible cystoscopy and urine cytology, which is usually performed after the patient presents with episodes of gross hematuria. Following these evaluations, if evidence exists that warrants further investigation for bladder cancer a TURBT is performed and accurate staging and grading of the tumor can occur (O'Sullivan et al 2012). For those patients who have localized disease and have bladder preservation therapies, long term surveillance (in high grade disease this is life-long) is required to monitor for recurrence of tumor (Sylvester et al 2006). While cystoscopy has proven to be an accurate tool (sensitivity 80%) in the surveillance of bladder cancer, it is nonetheless a highly invasive procedure (Jocham et al 2008). In addition, urine cytology, which has served as the traditional adjunct to cystoscopy operates with a modest degree of sensitivity and therefore potential to deliver false negatives where malignant cells are not seen and false positives for bladder cancer in patients with an acute or chronically inflamed urothlelium (Grossman et al 2005). This leaves room for the development of a diagnostic test that is able to deliver results with the specificity of cystoscopy but without the potential for false negatives seen with urine cytology.

Recently, studies have shown that certain genetic markers exist that accompany the occurrence of bladder cancer and can accurately discriminate between bladder tumors and normal tissue. These genetic markers also show promise in being able to deliver additional information regarding the disease state of this cancer, such the stage and grade of the tumor (Dyrskjot et al 2003; Dyrskjot et al 2005; Thykjaer et al 2001). The informative nature of these mRNA expression profiles, along with the frequency with which tumor exfoliation into the urine occurs, has led to the development of a urine-based test that has the potential to diagnose and stratify bladder cancer. This urine test, known as Cxbladder Monitor, was developed by Pacific Edge Limited and is able to perform a combinatory analysis of the expression profiles of five genetic biomarkers (IGF, HOXA, MDK, CDC and IL8R gene expression) and two clinical variables (whether the previous tumor was primary or recurrent and the time since the previous tumor was resected). This test has the potential, with further testing, to produce a consolidated diagnostic score that is able to accurately risk stratify a given patient for recurrence of bladder cancer based on tumor characteristics. The five genetic markers include CDC2 (a gene involved in cell cycle activity and DNA synthesis) (O'Sullivan et al 2012), HOXA13 (transcription factor involved in morphogenesis and differentiation of the genitourinary tract) (Scott et al 2005), IGFBP5 (affects processes such as such as development, differentiation, and cellular survival) (Beattie et al 2006), MDK (a heparin binding growth factor expressed during embryogenesis) (Kadomatsu et al 2004), and CXCR2 which is expressed in neutrophils and is increased in non-malignant, inflammatory conditions. This marker is essential as it is helpful in reducing the risk of false positive results in patients with an inflamed urothelium (O'Sullivan et al 2012). The Cxbladder test is able to take into account the expression of all these relevant genetic markers and analyze their expression profiles and interactions via a 2 way linear discriminate algorithm to form a score that is able to predict the recurrence of bladder cancer. The success of these preliminary studies with Cxbladder show that it has a strong potential to be used as a alternate to urine cytology and challenge cytology's routine accompaniment to cystoscopy. More importantly, the use of Cxbladder in the surveillance patient has the potential to decrease the frequency with which cystoscopy would need to be performed, adjudicate equivocal cystoscopy and cytology atypia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bladder Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

UC monitoring patients

Patients undergoing investigative cystoscopy for the detection of urothelial carcinoma as part of a standard-of-care schedule of investigations. All patients will have urine samples taken and analyzed for urine cytology and Cxbladder. No results for any tests under evaluation in this study are provided to the clinician for diagnostic purposes.

Cx bladder Monitor test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Cxbladder Monitor is a non-invasive UC detection test measuring five messenger RNA (mRNA) biomarkers present at elevated levels in patients presenting with urothelial carcinoma and also two clinical variables (whether the previous tumor was primary or recurrent and the time since the previous tumor was resected).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cx bladder Monitor test

Cxbladder Monitor is a non-invasive UC detection test measuring five messenger RNA (mRNA) biomarkers present at elevated levels in patients presenting with urothelial carcinoma and also two clinical variables (whether the previous tumor was primary or recurrent and the time since the previous tumor was resected).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is undergoing investigative cystoscopies for the monitoring of recurrence of urinary tract UC at intervals prescribed by the clinical practitioner
2. Patients on an "all-comers" basis
3. Positive diagnosis for primary or recurrent bladder tumour within the past 5 years
4. Able provide a voided urine sample of the required minimum volume
5. Able to give written consent
6. Able and willing to comply with study requirements
7. Aged 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior genitourinary manipulation (flexible or rigid cystoscopy / catheterisation, urethral dilation) in the 14 days before urine collection,
2. Patients who had exposure to intravesical BCG, had completed induction BCG but without a subsequent clear cystoscopy
3. Recent history of glomerulonephritis, nephrosis or other renal inflammatory disorders,
4. Recent history of pyelonephritis
5. Total cystectomy of the bladder, neo bladders and illeal conduits
6. Previous muscle invasive bladder tumour (pT2 or greater)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pacific Edge Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Jonathan Izawa

Primary Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan Izawa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Victoria Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shiva M Nair, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

5196858500 ext. 13933

Kaydee Connors, BSc

Role: CONTACT

5196858500 ext. 56366

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kaydee Connors, BSc

Role: primary

519-685-8500 ext. 56366

Shiva M Nair, MD

Role: backup

519-685-8500 ext. 13933

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15761078 (View on PubMed)

Parekh DJ, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G. Superficial and muscle-invasive bladder cancer: principles of management for outcomes assessments. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 10;24(35):5519-27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5431.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17158537 (View on PubMed)

O'Sullivan P, Sharples K, Dalphin M, Davidson P, Gilling P, Cambridge L, Harvey J, Toro T, Giles N, Luxmanan C, Alves CF, Yoon HS, Hinder V, Masters J, Kennedy-Smith A, Beaven T, Guilford PJ. A multigene urine test for the detection and stratification of bladder cancer in patients presenting with hematuria. J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22818138 (View on PubMed)

Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, Newling DW, Kurth K. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006 Mar;49(3):466-5; discussion 475-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.031. Epub 2006 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16442208 (View on PubMed)

Jocham D, Stepp H, Waidelich R. Photodynamic diagnosis in urology: state-of-the-art. Eur Urol. 2008 Jun;53(6):1138-48. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.048. Epub 2007 Dec 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18096307 (View on PubMed)

Grossman HB, Messing E, Soloway M, Tomera K, Katz G, Berger Y, Shen Y. Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay. JAMA. 2005 Feb 16;293(7):810-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.7.810.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15713770 (View on PubMed)

Dyrskjot L, Thykjaer T, Kruhoffer M, Jensen JL, Marcussen N, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Wolf H, Orntoft TF. Identifying distinct classes of bladder carcinoma using microarrays. Nat Genet. 2003 Jan;33(1):90-6. doi: 10.1038/ng1061. Epub 2002 Dec 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12469123 (View on PubMed)

Dyrskjot L, Zieger K, Kruhoffer M, Thykjaer T, Jensen JL, Primdahl H, Aziz N, Marcussen N, Moller K, Orntoft TF. A molecular signature in superficial bladder carcinoma predicts clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 1;11(11):4029-36. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2095.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15930337 (View on PubMed)

Thykjaer T, Workman C, Kruhoffer M, Demtroder K, Wolf H, Andersen LD, Frederiksen CM, Knudsen S, Orntoft TF. Identification of gene expression patterns in superficial and invasive human bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 2001 Mar 15;61(6):2492-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11289120 (View on PubMed)

Scott V, Morgan EA, Stadler HS. Genitourinary functions of Hoxa13 and Hoxd13. J Biochem. 2005 Jun;137(6):671-6. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvi086.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16002988 (View on PubMed)

Beattie J, Allan GJ, Lochrie JD, Flint DJ. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5): a critical member of the IGF axis. Biochem J. 2006 Apr 1;395(1):1-19. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060086.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16526944 (View on PubMed)

Kadomatsu K, Muramatsu T. Midkine and pleiotrophin in neural development and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2004 Feb 20;204(2):127-43. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00450-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15013213 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Waiting

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessment of BladderLight SurvEILlance
NCT03427034 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3