Nutrition Monitoring and Feeding Optimization With the smART+ System - Comparative Study

NCT ID: NCT04098224

Last Updated: 2025-05-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-12

Study Completion Date

2022-11-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The smART+ is a comprehensive modular patient care system intended for ICU patients.

The main purpose of the study is the optimization of the delivery of nutrition.

The use of the smART+ Feeding tube includes a feature of facilitating correct tube placement and alerting when the tube is displaced during ongoing use. The system will automatically stop feeding if displacement is detected. If a massive reflux episode is detected by the system, a balloon located on the tube will automatically inflate and automatic GRV (Gastric Residual Volume) feature will open to prevent gastric content from regurgitating to the esophagus.

In addition to tube placement, the system allows to obtain REE (Resting Energy Expenditure) measurements and calculates the optimized nutritional values required by the patient. Furthermore, the system optimizes feeding by compensating for any lost feeding time or discarded nutritional content that was discarded via the GRV (Gastric Residual Volume).

Study participants will be randomly assigned to a study group:

Group A- ICU patients receiving the investigational device ("Treated"). Group B- Control group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mechanically ventilated patients are unable to take food orally and therefore are dependent on enteral nutrition for provision of both energy and protein requirements. The conditions of ICU patients dramatically change throughout their ICU stay; "diseases, like particularly sepsis, trauma and burns, cause clinically relevant increase in resting energy expenditure (REE) of between 40% - 80%," and most patients do not reach their required protein and caloric targets. The American association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) recommends that for patients who are at high risk for malnutrition, efforts should be made to provide \>80% of the estimated or calculated energy and protein goal within 48-72 hours, starting with half the patient's calorie goal with the rate slowly increasing over time, in order to achieve the clinical benefit of enteral nutrition over the first week of hospitalization. However, studies have shown that more than 74% of ICU patients failed to receive at least 80% of their prescribed nutrition.

Predictive equations (such as Harris-Benedict equation) or a simple weight-based formula (48.1% and 48.7% respectively) have therefore been the most practiced methods of determining energy needs; however, the literature clearly indicates that each equation has a large potential for error. This makes it difficult to accurately predict an individual patient's energy requirements during critical illness. In general, predictive equations estimate accurately only 50% of the time in ICU patients, leading to over or under evaluation of the nutritional needs and inducing over or underfeeding. Numerous meta-analyses have demonstrated the poor value of predictive equations variability that is increased because body weight remains a value difficult to accurately assess.

To overcome the inaccuracy in determining the patient's energy consumption and the accompanying problems, the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) guidelines recommend to determine patients' REE based on indirect calorimetry or VCO2-based equation (VCO2 x 8.19). Unfortunately, this is not performed continuously during the course of enteral feeding to assess the ever-changing nutritional needs of the patient. Estimations showed that only 2% of ICUs were regularly using REE / indirect calorimetry,11 and therefore they must resort to performing a one-time calculation of the patient's energy consumption to manually calculate the caloric intake, food type and feeding rate.

This study aims to assess the accuracy of the smART+ System's REE module, compared to (1) the FDA-cleared COSMED device, and (2) nutritional calculations conducted with predictive equations regularly used by the clinical staff at the site.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aspiration Pneumonia Malnutrition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Interventional Device - Treated

Subjects connected to the investigational device smART+

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

smART+ System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Utilizing the smART+ System to provide feeding optimization to the patient

Control Group

treated according to local Standard of Care.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

smART+ System

Utilizing the smART+ System to provide feeding optimization to the patient

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and females 18 years or older
* Patient that have already been admitted to the ICU (no more than 48 hours before enrollment)
* Expected to be ventilated at least 48 hours after enrollments.
* Patient requires enteral feeding (by naso/oro-gastric feeding tube)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Known anatomical anomalies of the nose, oral cavity esophagus or the stomach that may prevent/hinder the ability to insert the feeding tube
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ART Medical Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ilya Kagan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beilinson Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beilinson Hospital

Petah Tikva, Isreal, Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kagan I, Hellerman-Itzhaki M, Bendavid I, Statlender L, Fishman G, Wischmeyer PE, de Waele E, Singer P. Controlled enteral nutrition in critical care patients - A randomized clinical trial of a novel management system. Clin Nutr. 2023 Sep;42(9):1602-1609. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.018. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37480797 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRO-C-2822

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of PEEP Trials on Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in ARDS Patients
NCT06823804 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2/PHASE3