Optimizing Enteral Nutrition Regimen for Critically Ill Patients
NCT ID: NCT07270939
Last Updated: 2025-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-30
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do shorter feeding cycles (with fasting windows) reduce ICU length of stay?
Do they lower the risk of infections like ventilator-associated pneumonia?
How do they affect calorie delivery, blood sugar control, and gastrointestinal tolerance?
Researchers will compare:
Continuous 24-hour feeding (standard care)
20-hour feeding with a 4-hour fasting window
18-hour feeding with a 6-hour fasting window
Participants will:
Be critically ill adults in the ICU who require at least 7 days of enteral feeding
Be randomized to one of the three feeding schedules
Receive daily monitoring of calories, protein, blood sugar, and GI tolerance
Have outcomes measured, including ICU length of stay, infections, metabolic control, and feeding tolerance
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
"Efficacy of Intermittent Enteral Nutrition Versus Continuous Administration in Intensive Care"
NCT05879263
Intermittent Versus Continuous Enteral Nutrition in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Medical Intensive Care Unit
NCT04437264
Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients
NCT00512122
Intermittent Versus Continuous Feeding in ICU Patients
NCT02358512
Pilot: Feasibility of Intermittent Enteral Feeding in Ventilated MICU Patients
NCT04164108
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Approximately 150 adult patients who require enteral nutrition for at least seven days will be enrolled across Hamad Medical Corporation ICUs. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using block randomization through REDCap to ensure allocation concealment. All groups will receive isocaloric enteral nutrition through nasogastric or orogastric tubes, with caloric and protein targets guided by indirect calorimetry or weight-based calculations.
Feeding plans will be initiated within 24 hours of ICU admission or stabilization. Patients assigned to the 18-hour and 20-hour arms will have structured fasting periods, while the control group will receive uninterrupted feeding. Daily assessments will capture nutritional delivery, gastrointestinal tolerance, and metabolic parameters, along with safety monitoring for adverse events. Data will be collected electronically via REDCap, de-identified, and audited regularly by the Clinical Trial Unit.
The study is designed to generate high-quality evidence on whether incorporating fasting windows into feeding schedules can optimize nutrition therapy, improve tolerance, reduce ICU stays, and minimize complications. Findings are expected to inform future ICU nutrition guidelines and contribute to the global discussion on intermittent versus continuous feeding practices.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
24-hour continuous feeding (control)
Feeding Schedule provides continuous enteral nutrition over 24 hours with no fasting window. This standard care in many ICUs serves as the baseline for comparison with two experimental cycled feeding regimens. The feeding rate is designed to evenly deliver the total daily caloric goal across the entire period.
No interventions assigned to this group
20-hour cycled feeding (intervention)
Feeding Schedule consists of enteral nutrition delivered over 20 hours, with a structured 4-hour fasting window each day. This approach aims to balance metabolic and gastrointestinal benefits while ensuring adequate daily caloric intake. Consequently, the feeding rate is increased to meet the total caloric goal within the shorter feeding period.
20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window
20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window (Intervention 1) Objective: To evaluate the physiological benefits of a structured daily fasting period while maintaining a conservative approach to caloric delivery.
18-hour cycled feeding (intervention)
Feeding Schedule involves enteral nutrition over an 18-hour period while incorporating a 6-hour fasting window in each 24-hour cycle. This structure is designed to test a more intense intermittent fasting regimen, aiming to enhance physiological benefits by better aligning with circadian rhythms. The expectations include improved metabolic control, enhanced gastrointestinal motility, and reduced infection rates, with careful monitoring for reduced caloric intake risk. Consequently, the feeding rate is increased to meet daily caloric goals within the 18-hour timeframe, resulting in the most intensive feeding schedule among the three examined arms.
18-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 6-Hour Fasting Window
Feeding Schedule involves enteral nutrition over an 18-hour period while incorporating a 6-hour fasting window in each 24-hour cycle. This structure is designed to test a more intense intermittent fasting regimen, aiming to enhance physiological benefits by better aligning with circadian rhythms. The expectations include improved metabolic control, enhanced gastrointestinal motility, and reduced infection rates, with careful monitoring for reduced caloric intake risk. Consequently, the feeding rate is increased to meet daily caloric goals within the 18-hour timeframe, resulting in the most intensive feeding schedule among the three examined arms.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window
20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window (Intervention 1) Objective: To evaluate the physiological benefits of a structured daily fasting period while maintaining a conservative approach to caloric delivery.
18-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 6-Hour Fasting Window
Feeding Schedule involves enteral nutrition over an 18-hour period while incorporating a 6-hour fasting window in each 24-hour cycle. This structure is designed to test a more intense intermittent fasting regimen, aiming to enhance physiological benefits by better aligning with circadian rhythms. The expectations include improved metabolic control, enhanced gastrointestinal motility, and reduced infection rates, with careful monitoring for reduced caloric intake risk. Consequently, the feeding rate is increased to meet daily caloric goals within the 18-hour timeframe, resulting in the most intensive feeding schedule among the three examined arms.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
2. Patients expected to require enteral nutrition (EN) for ≥ 7 days.
3. Critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU.
4. New patients initiating EN in the critical care unit.
5. Patients receiving EN via:
* a nasogastric (NG) tube.
* orogastric (OG) feeding tube.
Exclusion Criteria
* Active GI bleeding.
* Progressive GI disease.
* Recent GI tract resection.
2. Indication for a special diet formula.
3. Need for a large volume of feeding (as determined by the clinical team).
4. Pre-existing hepatic failure.
5. Use of a nasojejunal tube, gastrostomy, or jejunostomy.
6. Pregnancy confirmed via β-hCG testing for women of childbearing potential.
7. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hamad Medical Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mr.Mutaz Ibrahim Omar Othman
Charge Nurse
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MRC-01-25-949
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.