Intermittent Versus Continuous Feeding in ICU Patients

NCT ID: NCT02358512

Last Updated: 2018-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

127 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intermittent nasogastric enteral feeding, rather than conventional continuous enteral feeding, will preserve muscle mass in the critically ill (Primary end-point). Such maintenance may translate into improved outcomes including reduced length of intensive care unit (ICU) and/or hospital stay, as well as number of days on a ventilator. In addition, long-term improvements in health-related quality of life and physical activity levels may result in these ICU survivors once they are back in the community. Indeed, such benefits could translate into reductions in primary healthcare usage and its related costs (secondary end-points).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase II pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial to be conducted in two adult intensive care units. Technically, the patient will be blinded (by virtue of illness), and in any case knowledge of the feeding intervention they are receiving would not influence outcome. Scans will be taken by staff who could potentially be aware of treatment; keeping scanner personnel blinded would involve complex logistics to separate those randomising, scanning patients, and collecting data; however, the investigators don't think that the individuals taking the scans would introduce material bias. Importantly, all scans will be analysed by the same individual (based off-site) who will be blind to treatment status.

Within 24 hours of admission to ICU, patients recruited to the study will be randomised to either intermittent enteral feeding or continuous enteral feeding - both regimens delivering the same nutritional content over a 24 hour period. The intermittent feeding regimen will consist of six bolus feeds (one bolus every four hours) while the continuous feeding regimen consists of the total volume of feed administered over 24 hours. Feed volume in both groups will commence according to a standard 'usual practice' protocol so as not to delay feeding, but each patient will then have an individual regimen calculated by the dietician. Feeding will continue as either intermittent or continuous for the duration of the trial period as tolerated.

Ultrasound of the thigh (enabling derivation of the Rectus Femoris cross sectional area (RFCSA)) will be performed on Days 1,7,10 (or at discharge, if sooner), and at hospital discharge (if after Day 10), with blood and urine samples taken daily. The hospital discharge destination will be noted, and functional assessment will be determined prior to hospital discharge by two validated methods previously used in this patient cohort (6-Minute Walk Distance and Short Performance Battery Test). Patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will be determined for the pre-morbid period and at 12 months post ICU-discharge using the Short Form-36 health survey; primary care costs since discharge will also be ascertained.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care (ICU) Myopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intermittent enteral feeding

The intermittent feeding regimen will consist of six bolus feeds (one bolus every four hours).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enteral feeding

Intervention Type OTHER

Bolus feeds or continuous feeds during a 10-day ICU stay

Continuous enteral feeding

The continuous feeding regimen consists of the total volume of feed administered over 24 hours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Enteral feeding

Intervention Type OTHER

Bolus feeds or continuous feeds during a 10-day ICU stay

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enteral feeding

Bolus feeds or continuous feeds during a 10-day ICU stay

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Due to receive enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube as part of routine care; endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated; likely to remain intubated for 48 hours; likely to remain on the ICU for \>7 days; and to survive intensive care admission.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Active disseminated malignancy (diagnosed or suspected)
* Unilateral/bilateral lower limb amputees
* Single Organ Failure (SOFA score less than 2)
* Patients with a primary neuromyopathy
* Patients entered into trials of interventions which would affect muscle mass
* Patients assessed as requiring sole/supplemental parenteral nutrition or post-pyloric feeding
* Patients requiring extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
* Patients not meeting nutritional requirements in 72 hours using a standard feeding schedule
* Patients requiring the use of high protein feed
* Admission to ICU within the previous 3 months
* Ward patients who have received artificial enteral tube feeding within this hospital admission
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicholas Hart, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Puthucheary ZA, Hart N. Skeletal muscle mass and mortality - but what about functional outcome? Crit Care. 2014 Feb 17;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/cc13729.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24528611 (View on PubMed)

Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, Chan P, Hopkinson NS, Phadke R, Dew T, Sidhu PS, Velloso C, Seymour J, Agley CC, Selby A, Limb M, Edwards LM, Smith K, Rowlerson A, Rennie MJ, Moxham J, Harridge SD, Hart N, Montgomery HE. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1591-600. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278481.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24108501 (View on PubMed)

Wilkinson D, Gallagher IJ, McNelly A, Bear DE, Hart N, Montgomery HE, Le Guennec A, Conte MR, Francis T, Harridge SDR, Atherton PJ, Puthucheary ZA. The metabolic effects of intermittent versus continuous feeding in critically ill patients. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):19508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46490-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37945671 (View on PubMed)

McNelly AS, Bear DE, Connolly BA, Arbane G, Allum L, Tarbhai A, Cooper JA, Hopkins PA, Wise MP, Brealey D, Rooney K, Cupitt J, Carr B, Koelfat K, Damink SO, Atherton PJ, Hart N, Montgomery HE, Puthucheary ZA. Effect of Intermittent or Continuous Feed on Muscle Wasting in Critical Illness: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):183-194. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.045. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32247714 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14\LO\1792

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.