Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS With Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway
NCT ID: NCT04070053
Last Updated: 2023-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
920 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-23
2022-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway. To assess feasibility, the investigators will test the ability to measure adherence to the pathway as well as patient and economic outcomes. To assess perceptions about the acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway, the investigators will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identification and Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS With Protection, Paralysis, and Proning Pathway
NCT04744298
Veno-venous Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in ARDS-patients to Treat Respiratory Acidosis
NCT01911533
High Flow Therapy for the Treatment of Respiratory Failure in the ED
NCT02236559
Pulmonary and Ventilatory Effects of Bed Verticalization in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT04371016
Feasibility and Efficacy of Automated Lateral Decubitus Therapy in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT06698913
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The pilot study will use a before and after quasi-experimental design to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the TheraPPP pathway. The TheraPPP pathway is a comprehensive evidence-based, stakeholder-informed pathway for the diagnosis and management of HRF. The study will be conducted in a single center mixed medical surgical ICU. The study population will include all patients who are admitted to the ICU and are mechanically ventilated.
The pathway will be implemented over a one month period, followed by a one year post implementation assessment period. The comparison (control) therapy will be usual management assessed in the one year pre-implementation period. We estimate approximately 1000 patients will be included in the study.
The primary objectives of the pilot study will be to assess feasibility and acceptability. To assess feasibility, the investigators will test the ability to measure: (1) Fidelity through 5 process of care indicators (2) Patient and economic outcomes. To assess the acceptability of the Pathway, the investigators will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the pathway. The acceptability survey will be sent to approximately 250 ICU clinicians.
For data analysis, no specific comparisons will be made as the investigators are testing the ability to measure the outcomes. However, feasibility and acceptability data will be presented in aggregate as frequency with proportion or median with interquartile range, as appropriate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
To assess Pathway feasibility we will collect patient data for two years and one month: one year immediately prior to implementation as well as one month during plus one year following implementation.
To assess acceptability of the pathway we will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the pathway.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TheraPPP Pathway
We will perform a before and after study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HRF and ARDS Pathway during its pilot implementation.
All mechanically ventilated patients will enter the pathway during the one month implementation and one year post-implementation periods.
To assess Pathway feasibility we will collect patient data for approximately two years and one month: one year immediately prior to implementation, one month during, and one year following implementation.
To assess acceptability of the pathway we will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.
TheraPPP Pathway
TheraPPP Steps:
Step 1. All mechanically ventilated patients will have a height measured and documented. Step 2. Screening for HRF. Step 3. Initiate Lung Protective Ventilation (LPV). Step 4. Paralysis. Step 5. Prone Positioning.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TheraPPP Pathway
TheraPPP Steps:
Step 1. All mechanically ventilated patients will have a height measured and documented. Step 2. Screening for HRF. Step 3. Initiate Lung Protective Ventilation (LPV). Step 4. Paralysis. Step 5. Prone Positioning.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Invasively mechanically ventilated
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alberta Health services
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ken Kuljit Parhar, MD
Consultant Intensivist & Clinical Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ken Parhar, MD MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Hospital Intensive Care Unit
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
897
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2019
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
REB19-0939
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.