Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-25
2024-11-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brain Activity in Time Discrimination and Sensory Input
NCT00726050
Causal Role of Frontostriatal Circuitry in Goal-directed Behavior
NCT05593965
Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Free Will
NCT00029653
Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to Study Visual Attention
NCT00006285
Magnetic Prefrontal Stimulation for Studying the Role of the Cortex in High-level Cognition Processes and Reward System
NCT00912522
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, human electroencephalography (EEG) and a non-painful tactile detection task are used to assess if and how the rate and timing of ongoing rhythmic events in the alpha/beta bands prior to a tactile stimulus causally impact touch perception, and how this relates to attention. A custom TMS protocol that is hypothesized to mimic endogenous beta-frequency event patterns is used to test whether TMS can impact perception in a similar manner. Finally, computational neural modeling designed to simulate macro-scale EEG signals is used to aid in the interpretation of potential neural circuit mechanisms underlying features of acquired EEG data.
The TMS-EEG components of this study will use a within-subjects crossover design. In initial study sessions, participants will have an MRI. In subsequent study sessions, participants will complete a tactile detection task while EEG data is recorded concurrent with online active or sham TMS. Analyses will focus on comparing detection probabilities of tactile stimuli presented at perceptual threshold and tactile evoked response potential waveforms between trials in which TMS pulses or endogenous beta events occur with similar timing and intensity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
In two subsequent concurrent TMS-EEG sessions, all participants will receive active TMS while carrying out a tactile detection task. During one of the two TMS-EEG sessions, TMS will be applied over primary somatosensory cortex. During the other TMS-EEG session, TMS will be applied over a control brain region.
The order of somatosensory vs. non-somatosensory TMS targeting will be counterbalanced across participants.
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tactile detection task with online TMS-EEG
Participants receive perceptual threshold-level tactile stimuli to the third digit of the right hand and report detection or non-detection. EEG is recorded and TMS is applied over somatosensory cortex during the tactile detection task.
Online active TMS
One single pulse or triple pulse train (3 pulses, 20ms inter-pulse interval) of TMS will be delivered per trial (at least 5 seconds apart) "online", or during the tactile detection task, at less than or equal to 80% active motor threshold.
Tactile detection task with online control TMS-EEG
Participants receive perceptual threshold-level tactile stimuli to the third digit of the right hand and report detection or non-detection. EEG is recorded and TMS is applied over a control brain region during the tactile detection task. This control condition is intended to mimic the peripheral (e.g. cranial/facial muscle and/or nerve activation, auditory evoked response), but not biological effects of TMS specifically related to somatosensory perception.
Online active TMS
One single pulse or triple pulse train (3 pulses, 20ms inter-pulse interval) of TMS will be delivered per trial (at least 5 seconds apart) "online", or during the tactile detection task, at less than or equal to 80% active motor threshold.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Online active TMS
One single pulse or triple pulse train (3 pulses, 20ms inter-pulse interval) of TMS will be delivered per trial (at least 5 seconds apart) "online", or during the tactile detection task, at less than or equal to 80% active motor threshold.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: 18-65 years
* English fluency: participants must be able to understand screening questionnaires and task instructions spoken/written in English.
* Right handed: to reduce heterogeneity related to hand dominance, since our task involves touch perception on the hand, and examination of neural correlates in lateralized brain regions.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, or immediate (1st degree relative) family history epilepsy
* Any progressive (e.g., neurodegenerative) neurological disorder
* Chronic medical conditions that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.)
* Metal implants (excluding dental fillings)
* Pacemaker
* Implanted medication pump or cochlear implant
* Vagal nerve stimulator
* Deep brain stimulator
* TENS unit (unless removed completely for the study)
* Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt
* Signs of increased intracranial pressure
* Intracranial lesion
* History of head injury resulting in prolonged loss of consciousness
* Pregnancy
* Participants who have received prior TMS for medical treatment purposes.
* Intellectual Disability or autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
* Active psychosis, diagnosis of unipolar depression or bipolar disorder, active severe substance use disorders (within the last month), or active suicidal intent or ideations.
* Conditions that may result in the inability to effectively carry out the tactile detection task, including loss of feeling, neuropathy or nerve damage in the hands or feet, chronic pain or fibromyalgia, and pain due to cancer, infection or arthritis.
* If the participant is actively taking any of the medications that increase risk from TMS as indicated below, of if they have ingested any alcohol or any other drugs of abuse (see https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse) on the day of the study session (prior to the session).
Contraindicated medications:
alcohol Amitriptyline Amphetamines ampicillin Anticholinergics Antihistamines aripiprazole BCNU \*\*bupropion\*\* cephalosporins chlorambucil chloroquine Chlorpromazine citalopram Clozapine Cocaine cyclosporine cytosine arabinoside Doxepine duloxetine fluoxetine fluphenazine fluvoxamine Foscarnet gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) Ganciclovir haloperidol imipenem Imipramine isoniazid ketamine levofloxacin Lithium Maprotiline MDMA (ecstasy) mefloquine methotrexate metronidazole mianserin mirtazapine Nortriptyline olanzapine paroxetine penicillin phencyclidine (PCP, angel's dust) pimozide quetiapine reboxetine risperidone Ritonavir \*\*Sertraline\*\* Sympathomimetic theophylline venlafaxine vincristine ziprasidone
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
NIH
Brown University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephanie R Jones, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brown University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science Human Testing Space (HuTS)
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jones SR, Kerr CE, Wan Q, Pritchett DL, Hamalainen M, Moore CI. Cued spatial attention drives functionally relevant modulation of the mu rhythm in primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 13;30(41):13760-5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2969-10.2010.
Sherman MA, Lee S, Law R, Haegens S, Thorn CA, Hamalainen MS, Moore CI, Jones SR. Neural mechanisms of transient neocortical beta rhythms: Converging evidence from humans, computational modeling, monkeys, and mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 16;113(33):E4885-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604135113. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Shin H, Law R, Tsutsui S, Moore CI, Jones SR. The rate of transient beta frequency events predicts behavior across tasks and species. Elife. 2017 Nov 6;6:e29086. doi: 10.7554/eLife.29086.
Jones SR, Pritchett DL, Stufflebeam SM, Hamalainen M, Moore CI. Neural correlates of tactile detection: a combined magnetoencephalography and biophysically based computational modeling study. J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 3;27(40):10751-64. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0482-07.2007.
Jones SR, Pritchett DL, Sikora MA, Stufflebeam SM, Hamalainen M, Moore CI. Quantitative analysis and biophysically realistic neural modeling of the MEG mu rhythm: rhythmogenesis and modulation of sensory-evoked responses. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3554-72. doi: 10.1152/jn.00535.2009. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1902002327
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.