Antireflux Ablation Therapy (ARAT) Vs Antireflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) In The Management Of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT ID: NCT04036942
Last Updated: 2025-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-15
2025-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Antireflux Ablation Therapy (ARAT) for Gastroesophageal Reflux Treatment
NCT03548298
ARAT for Reflux Disease After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia
NCT04065516
Anti-Reflux Mucosectomy in the Treatment of Refractory Gastro-esophageal Reflux
NCT05745012
Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) is a Useful Therapy for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (RGERD)
NCT03259191
Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Therapy Randomized Sham Control Trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT06106100
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hybrid argon plasma.
After diagnostic endoscopy investigators will proceed to use argon plasma probe for marking 270 grades around the esophagogastric junction preserving part of the mucosa towards the greater curvature, then investigators will use the jet included in the argon plasma probe with effect 20 to 40 system for the injection of the background submucosa in the marking area, applying 0.9% saline solution with methylene blue, to achieve adequate Submucosal elevation for application or argon plasma with high voltages (100 watts, 1.5 liters / min) using forced coagulation mode, applying plasma argon to 1cm above the Z line in the esophageal mucosa and 2cm below it towards the gastric mucosa, argon will be applied until a "carbonization" effect of the mucosa is achieved, once the application of the therapy is performed mucosal lavage and immersion technique to corroborate integrity and continuity of the gastrointestinal tract and rule out immediate complications
Ablation of the gastroesophageal junction with hybrid argon plasma
In the management group with argon plasma hybrid after marking 270 degrees of the esophagogastric junction, submucosal elevation and argon plasma burn of the marked and elevated area is performed.
Band mucosectomy
After diagnostic endoscopy investigators will proceed to use the tip of a polypectomy snare for marking 270 grades around the esophagogastric junction preserving part of the mucosa towards the greater curvature, then investigators will perform submucosal elevation with the injection of 0.9% saline with carmine indigo and adrenaline 1:10000, after adequate submucosal elevation investigators will proceed with the help of a band ligation cap to suction and release the elastic band in the previously marked and elevated tissue, proceeding to resect the previously ligated tissue with polypectomy loop below the elastic band with forced coagulation (Effect 2, 40 W), until the marked mucosa is completely resected (average used of 5 elastic bands, reviewing the work area for complications like bleeding or perforation.
mucosectomy with band of the gastroesophageal junction
In the management group with mucosectomy after marking 270 degrees of the esophagogastric junction, a submucosal elevation of the marked area is performed to subsequently perform ligation and resection with a hot snare below the ligation area.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ablation of the gastroesophageal junction with hybrid argon plasma
In the management group with argon plasma hybrid after marking 270 degrees of the esophagogastric junction, submucosal elevation and argon plasma burn of the marked and elevated area is performed.
mucosectomy with band of the gastroesophageal junction
In the management group with mucosectomy after marking 270 degrees of the esophagogastric junction, a submucosal elevation of the marked area is performed to subsequently perform ligation and resection with a hot snare below the ligation area.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Confirmed diagnosis of GERD as follows:
Positive pHmetry. Positive endoscopy (Esophagitis grade C, D, stenosis or EB)
* Esophagogastric junction Hill I-III
* Total or partial response to proton pump inhibitors
* Patient who does not wish to take medication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in the long term or indefinitely or refractory GERD
Exclusion Criteria
* Postoperative fundoplication patients for GERD
* Patients with extraesophageal symptoms.
* Pregnant women.
* Patients with hiatal hernia larger than 3 cm or Hill type IV.
* Patients with major esophageal motility disorders.
* Patients with portal hypertension and presence of esophageal varices
* Patients with hemophilia or some haematological disorder that is difficult to control
* Patients with malignant pathology of the esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ).
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oscar V Hernandez Mondragon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI Hospital de Especialidades
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hedberg HM, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB. First Experience with Banded Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: Feasibility, Safety, and Technique (with Video). J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun;23(6):1274-1278. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04115-1. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, Zerbib F, Mion F, Smout AJPM, Vaezi M, Sifrim D, Fox MR, Vela MF, Tutuian R, Tack J, Bredenoord AJ, Pandolfino J, Roman S. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351-1362. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Manner H, Neugebauer A, Scharpf M, Braun K, May A, Ell C, Fend F, Enderle MD. The tissue effect of argon-plasma coagulation with prior submucosal injection (Hybrid-APC) versus standard APC: A randomized ex-vivo study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Oct;2(5):383-90. doi: 10.1177/2050640614544315.
Inoue H, Ito H, Ikeda H, Sato C, Sato H, Phalanusitthepha C, Hayee B, Eleftheriadis N, Kudo SE. Anti-reflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the absence of hiatus hernia: a pilot study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27(4):346-351.
Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, Reardon PR, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD; SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2647-69. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1267-8. Epub 2010 Aug 20. No abstract available.
Gyawali CP, Fass R. Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(2):302-318. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
Huerta-Iga F, Tamayo-de la Cuesta JL, Noble-Lugo A, Hernandez-Guerrero A, Torres-Villalobos G, Ramos-de la Medina A, Pantoja-Millan JP; el Grupo Mexicano para el Estudio de la Enfermedad por Reflujo Gastroesofagico. [The Mexican consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Part II]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2013 Oct-Dec;78(4):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Nov 28. Spanish.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R-2019-3601-179
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.