Gastro-intestinal Physiology After Anti-Reflux Procedures
NCT ID: NCT05238636
Last Updated: 2022-11-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-05-12
2024-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will perform tests on adult patients at St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust before and again 6 months after their surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication, LINX device or Stretta procedure). The tests are safe and are mostly performed in routine care.
The tests will analyse how surgery affects:
* the strength of the oesophagus muscles
* the amount of acid leaking up
* how sensitive the oesophagus is to acid
* symptoms
This should help lead to a better understanding of what changes are important to make people feel better from GORD and help inform treatment decisions with patients in future.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physiological Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Anti-reflux Surgery
NCT03390634
Observational Study of Anti-Reflux Surgery
NCT01624506
Endoloop Mediated Cardioplication to Treat Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT06153901
A Post-market Registry to Assess Safety and Performance of RefluxStop™ in the Treatment of GERD in General Hospital Practice
NCT07004439
Surgery in Chronic Cough GERD Related
NCT01899183
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Laparoscopic fundoplication and LINX are the most commonly performed anti-reflux surgery (ARS) and are procedures designed to increase the tightness of the LOS. The Stretta procedure is a mimimally invasive and non-surgical anti-reflux procedure, first develped in 2000 and has been gaining in popularity and interest. It involves a balloon catheter being introduced via the mouth to the oesophagus, in a sedated or anaesthetised patient. Gastroscopy is performed first to establish the location of the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ). The Stretta catheter then deploys four 5.5mm needle electrodes into the mucosa 1cm above the GOJ. Radiofrequency energy is deployed through the needles to achieve a target temperature fo 85°C for 1 minute. The device is then repostioned to target the electrodes on a total of 56 sites in in the lower oesophagus and gastric cardia. The mechanism of action remains poorly understood. It is thought to cause local inflammation and muscular thickening of the LOS, but objective evidence for this is lacking. Studies on Stretta have been small and often retrospective and there is also a paucity of UK data. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Fass et al. in 2017 concluded that Stretta significantly improved quality of life, reduced acid suppressing medication use and reduced oesophageal acid exposure time, but statistical significance was not reached with regards to its effect on LOS pressure; leading to much ongoing debate about its mechanism of action.
Liu et al (2014) performed a small study showing that oesophageal inflammation/erosions were reduced 6 months following Stretta, again justifying that Stretta is an effective treatment for GORD. The main hypotheses in the literatrure for the mechanism of action of Stretta involve increasing LOS basal pressure, reducing transient LOS relaxations (TLOSRs) and reducing oesophageal sensitivity; with no clear consensus. Tam et al (2003), on a study with 20 patients, showed that Stretta reduced TLOSRs, increased basal LOS pressure and reduced oesophageal acid exposure time at 6 months. Arts et al (2012) gave sildenafil, a smooth muscle relaxant, to 22 patients 3 months after Stretta. They found that sildenafil was able to reduce the LOS pressure, suggesting that the improvement in acid exposure was not due to scarring/fibrosis of the LOS and was therefore due to increased muscle tone.
Further evaluation of LOS function is therefore needed to ascertain how Stretta improves symptoms. EndoFLIP is an endoscopic technique using specialised balloon catheter with pressure sensors that can be placed at the gastro-oesophageal junction at the time of gastroscopy to determine the pressure and distensibility of the GOJ. Kwiatek et al (2010) first described its applicability to GORD, showing that in a sample of 20 patients GOJ distensibility was increased two-fold in GORD patients compared controls. More recently, retrospective analysis of nearly 600 patients by Lee et al (2021) showed that GOJ distensibility was again increased in both erosive and non-erosive GORD, compared to healthy controls. The applicability of EndoFLIP following ARS is not yet known. There are only 5 small published studies regarding EndoFLIP after fundoplication, as described in systematic review by Desprez et al (2020), showing that GOJ distensibility was reduced, but methods varied and the correlation with symptomatic outcomes was uncertain. The application of EndoFLIP to GORD and oesophageal disorders is increasingly being appreciated yet there are no published studies looking at EndoFLIP post LINX or Stretta - this project would be the first to do this, as well as further evaluate its use post fundoplication. GOJ distensibility has been shown to be increased in GORD, and it is hypothesised that it will be reduced by Stretta, LINX and fundoplication, and can thus be a useful measure of response to treatment.
Acid perfusion testing (the Bernstein test) is a test of oesophageal sensitivity and is performed by infusing 0.1M hydrochloric acid into the oesophagus via a nasogastric catheter to see if the symptoms of GORD are reproduced. Arts et al (2019) performed the Bernstein test on 13 patients post Stretta and found that oesophageal sensitivity to acid was reduced, suggesting that Stretta made the oesophagus less sensitive to acid. Further evaluation of oesophageal sensitivity to acid post ARS is therefore needed. Another marker for oesophageal sensitivity may be the calcitonin gene related peptide (CRRP), which Xu et al (2013) showed was a marker for afferent sensory nerves in the oesophageal mucosa and was more abundant in those with non-erosive GORD, suggesting its role as a marker of oesophageal sensitivity. CGRP has never been evaluated post ARS - this project would be the first to do this, alongside the Bernstein test.
This study is unique as it will prospectively obtain detailed objective information of oesophageal physiology, using state of the art techniques, pre and post three different ARS, alongside validated symptom assessment, to allow for comparison in efficacy and mechanism of action for symptomatic improvement for Stretta, fundoplication and LINX.
The objective is to obtain detailed information on physiology and GORD symptoms before and 6 month following Stretta, LINX or fundoplication. The investigators will look for changes to explain symptomatic improvement and examine differences between the three ARS procedures.
Outcomes include:
• LOS pressure
* This will be measured with high resolution oesophageal manometry. The investigators will look to see if there is an increase in LOS pressure in each of three ARS and how well this correlates with oesophageal acid exposure and symptom improvement. It is expected that with increased LOS pressure, symptoms of acid reflux will be improved.
• LOS distensibility
* This will be measured with EndoFLIP. The investigators will look to see if there is a statistically significant difference in LOS distensibility between the three anti-reflux procedures and how well this correlates with oesophageal acid exposure, LOS pressure and symptom improvement. The investigators would expect that with reduced LOS distensibility oesophageal acid exposure will also be reduced. It is expected that fundoplication and LINX to have greater reductions in LOS distensibility compared to Stretta, due to the anatomical disruption of these surgeries.
• Oesophageal acid exposure
* This will be measured with either 24hr ambulatory pH/impedance nasogastric catheter with symptom association, or with 96hr wireless oesophageal Bravo pH capsule. The investigators will look to see if there is a significant difference in oesophageal acid exposure between the three anti-reflux procedures and if this correlates with symptom improvement. It is expected that with reduced oesophageal acid exposure symptoms will improve.
• Oesophageal sensitivity to acid
* This will be measured with the Bernstein test. The investigators will look to see whether the three ARS anti-reflux procedures reduce the sensitivity of the oesophagus to acid. It is hypothesised that sensitivity to acid will be most reduced by Stretta, due to the thermal injury caused by the procedure.
• Gastroscopy
* The investigators will look to characterise the endoscopic appearances of the oesophagus pre and post anti-reflux procedure, including the macroscopic presence of oesophagitis and hiatus hernia. In patients known to have erosive reflux oesophagitis, it is hypothesised this to be improved following their anti-reflux procedure.
• Oesophageal biopsies
* During gastroscopy, oesophageal biopsies will be taken for immunohistochemical analysis for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which is a marker of afferent sensory neurons. Previous studies have shown this to be related to oesophageal sensitivity and that it is more superficial in the oesophageal mucosa in patients with oesophageal hypersensitivity. The investigators will look to see whether anti-reflux procedures affect the presence and location of CGRP, which may contribute to improvement in symptoms. It is hypothesised that this will be reduced by Stretta due to the thermal injury but unchanged by fundoplication and LINX.
• Symptoms
* This will be objectively assessed with validated symptom questionnaires - Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ), Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Hospital Odynophagia and Dysphagia Questionnaire (HODQ), Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and GERD-HRQL. The investigators will look to see if there is a statistically significant improvement in symptoms between the anti-reflux procedures.
• Use of acid suppressing medications
* The investigators will ask patients if they are requiring acid suppressing medication such as PPI following their anti-reflux procedure. It is expected that PPI use will reduce following their procedure.
The aim is to determine how the Stretta procedure affects the functioning of the oesophagus with physiological testing, and how well it improves reflux symptoms, in comparison to other surgical anti-reflux procedures.
This gap in understanding is important to address. By understanding the mechanism of action of the Stretta procedure, in comparison to fundoplication and LINX, the investigators will better appreciate which patients are most likely to benefit from being offered it. It will also further knowledge of the pathophysiology of GORD and which factors are important for symptom resolution, which will in turn better inform decisions with patients with regards to their symptoms and ARS, and may lead to the development of other more specialised minimally invasive anti-reflux procedures in future.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stretta
Patients that have undergone or are to undergo the Stretta procedure
Anti-reflux surgery - Stretta procedure or LINX device or laparoscopic fundoplication
This is an observational study. Patients will choose which anti-reflux procedure (Stretta, LINX or fundoplication) they undergo with their clinician, as is standard practice, after which they will be offered recruitment to this study, which will perform investigations to assess for changes in physiology and symptoms.
LINX
Patients that have undergone or are to undergo the LINX device
Anti-reflux surgery - Stretta procedure or LINX device or laparoscopic fundoplication
This is an observational study. Patients will choose which anti-reflux procedure (Stretta, LINX or fundoplication) they undergo with their clinician, as is standard practice, after which they will be offered recruitment to this study, which will perform investigations to assess for changes in physiology and symptoms.
Laparoscopic fundoplication
Patients that have undergone or are to undergo laparoscopic fundoplication.
Anti-reflux surgery - Stretta procedure or LINX device or laparoscopic fundoplication
This is an observational study. Patients will choose which anti-reflux procedure (Stretta, LINX or fundoplication) they undergo with their clinician, as is standard practice, after which they will be offered recruitment to this study, which will perform investigations to assess for changes in physiology and symptoms.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anti-reflux surgery - Stretta procedure or LINX device or laparoscopic fundoplication
This is an observational study. Patients will choose which anti-reflux procedure (Stretta, LINX or fundoplication) they undergo with their clinician, as is standard practice, after which they will be offered recruitment to this study, which will perform investigations to assess for changes in physiology and symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Decision to specifically undergo Stretta procedure, laparoscopic fundoplication or LINX device (N.B. this study will have no involvement in that decision or choice of procedure)
* Symptoms compatible with GORD, e.g. heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain
* Physiological evidence of GORD, e.g. endoscopy, HRM, pH studies
* Male or Female
* Age 18 to 90
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with significant medical co-morbidities
* Patients unable to provide consent for study participation
* Patients unable to easily attend hospital for the physiological tests
* Patients who have had complications from their anti-reflux procedure
* Patients who have previously undergone oesophageal surgery
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology
OTHER
St George's, University of London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jamal Hayat
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Joseph Cooney
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frazzoni M, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Frazzoni L, Melotti G. Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14272-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14272.
Schizas D, Mastoraki A, Papoutsi E, Giannakoulis VG, Kanavidis P, Tsilimigras D, Ntourakis D, Lyros O, Liakakos T, Moris D. LINX(R) reflux management system to bridge the "treatment gap" in gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review of 35 studies. World J Clin Cases. 2020 Jan 26;8(2):294-305. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i2.294.
Triadafilopoulos G. Stretta: a valuable endoscopic treatment modality for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7730-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7730.
Trudgill NJ, Sifrim D, Sweis R, Fullard M, Basu K, McCord M, Booth M, Hayman J, Boeckxstaens G, Johnston BT, Ager N, De Caestecker J. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring. Gut. 2019 Oct;68(10):1731-1750. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318115. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Desprez C, Roman S, Leroi AM, Gourcerol G. The use of impedance planimetry (Endoscopic Functional Lumen Imaging Probe, EndoFLIP(R) ) in the gastrointestinal tract: A systematic review. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Sep;32(9):e13980. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13980.
BERNSTEIN LM, BAKER LA. A clinical test for esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1958 May;34(5):760-81. No abstract available.
Sawada A, Lei WY, Zhang M, Lee C, Ustaoglu A, Chen CL, Sifrim D. Esophageal mucosal sensory nerves and potential mechanoreceptors in patients with ineffective esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Feb;34(2):e14205. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14205. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
Lawenko RM, Lee YY. Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using the Bravo Capsule pH System. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jan 31;22(1):25-30. doi: 10.5056/jnm15151.
Chan Y, Ching JY, Cheung CM, Tsoi KK, Polder-Verkiel S, Pang SH, Quan WL, Kee KM, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Wu JC. Development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the GERD-QOL questionnaire. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb 1;31(3):452-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04187.x. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
296193
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2021.0212
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.