Multicenter Single-Blind RCT of CTIF Versus LNF For Treatment of GERD in Patients Requiring Hiatal Hernia Repair

NCT ID: NCT04795934

Last Updated: 2025-08-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

142 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-26

Study Completion Date

2030-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This single-blind randomized control study will follow 142 subjects across 7 sites randomized on a 1:1 ratio to compare treatment efficacy and safety between TIF and LNF in GERD patients with hiatal hernia undergoing hernia repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

GERD Hiatal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Measures will be taken to minimize or avoid bias in the study "masking/blinding procedures." Neither treatment groups will be advised as to which procedure (TIF or LNF) they will be receiving. Randomization assignment will be recorded in the EDC and subject tracking, but will not be recorded within the EMR to reduce clinical team exposure to their randomized status for follow-up care. Research teams will not be blinded to the randomization results.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF)

Control

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LAPAROSCOPIC PARAESOPHAGEAL HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR COMBINED WITH TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LAPAROSCOPIC PARAESOPHAGEAL HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR COMBINED WITH TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION

Combo Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (CTIF)

Treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LAPAROSCOPIC PARAESOPHAGEAL HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR COMBINED WITH TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LAPAROSCOPIC PARAESOPHAGEAL HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR COMBINED WITH TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LAPAROSCOPIC PARAESOPHAGEAL HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR COMBINED WITH TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION

LAPAROSCOPIC PARAESOPHAGEAL HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR COMBINED WITH TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 22-80 years of age
2. Subjects have GERD with hiatal hernia \< 5 cm (defined as maximum ,axial height from end of the esophagus to diaphragm by any study including upper endoscopy esophagram and or at time of surgery) and Hill grade III or IV
3. Pathologic reflux while off PPI based on Lyon criteria by either of the following:

3.1. Conclusive evidence for pathologic reflux defined as acid exposure time (AET) \> 6% (worst day) or LA grade C or D esophagitis.

3.2. Borderline evidence of pathologic reflux defined as presence of one of the following parameters: AET 4-6%, LA grade A or B.
4. Commitment to long-term study
5. Ability to give consent individually or by a legally authorized representative

Exclusion Criteria

1. Hiatal hernia \> 5 cm (defined as maximum axial height from end of the esophagus to diaphragm by any study including upper endoscopy esophagram and or at time of surgery)
2. Evidence of clinically significant major esophageal motility disorder as determined by the site primary investigator
3. Pregnancy (in females) at time of procedure
4. Previous anti-reflux procedure
5. Subjects requiring mesh treatment at time of procedure
6. At the discretion of the site PI for subject safety
7. BMI \> 35 at time of surgery.
8. Prior gastric surgery that may affect ability to perform either procedure or affect normal gastric function (e.g. gastrectomy, gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, pyloroplasty.
9. Severe gastroparesis
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

EndoGastric Solutions

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Irvine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fox Valley Surgical Associates

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southern California

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Omar Ghanem

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California Irvine

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

The University of Texas at Austin

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fox Valley Surgical

Appleton, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-005226

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stretta Versus Conservative Treatment
NCT05781347 RECRUITING NA
Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT05678491 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA