Endoscopic Resection in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
NCT ID: NCT03357809
Last Updated: 2019-04-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-10
2023-04-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
H. Inoue (inventor of the anti-reflux mucosectomy 20 years ago) and his team postulated that the reflux symptoms would be reduced by creating a relative restriction of gastric cardia. The healing of the mucosectomy zone led to restriction of gastric cardia. This observation suggested that ARMS could represent an effective anti-reflux procedure with the advantage that no prostheses would be left in situ.
Few studies have evaluated this new endoscopic technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of gastric mucosectomy for patients with GERD resistant to medical treatment or requiring long-term maintenance medical treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anti-Reflux Mucosectomy in the Treatment of Refractory Gastro-esophageal Reflux
NCT05745012
Diagnostic Yield of Post PRandial Esophageal High Resolution Impedance Manometry in Patients With Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Resistant to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
NCT03596476
One-stop-shop Endoscopy in Reflux-patients: Evaluation of ENT and GI Features
NCT05634187
Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) is a Useful Therapy for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (RGERD)
NCT03259191
Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT05678491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients will be followed for 2 years with esophageal and gastric PH-impedance monitoring at 6 months and 24 months. Health related quality of life questionnaires will be completed before ARMS, 6 and 24 months after mucosectomy.
The characteristics of the patients will be compared to evaluate the % of responders and non-responders
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endoscopic treatment
ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION AT DAY 1
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Mucosectomy performed at day 1. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is at least 3 cm long. The mucosal resection is carried out along the side of the small curvature of the stomach, in order to preserve a valve of the cardia at the level of the large curvature of the stomach.
A coloured solution is injected into the submucosa following markers. The correct submucosal injection is confirmed by the lifting of the mucosal surface. A submucosal dissection is carried out using the dual knife. The mucosectomy is repeatedly performed until the mucosal zone is completely resected. The choice of the resection technique will depend on the anatomy of the patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Mucosectomy performed at day 1. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is at least 3 cm long. The mucosal resection is carried out along the side of the small curvature of the stomach, in order to preserve a valve of the cardia at the level of the large curvature of the stomach.
A coloured solution is injected into the submucosa following markers. The correct submucosal injection is confirmed by the lifting of the mucosal surface. A submucosal dissection is carried out using the dual knife. The mucosectomy is repeatedly performed until the mucosal zone is completely resected. The choice of the resection technique will depend on the anatomy of the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Achalasia or other esophageal motor disorders
* Voluminous hiatal hernia Haemorrhagic, haemostasis or coagulation disorders
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arthur Laquiere
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arthur Laquière, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
French Society of Digestive Endoscopy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
LAQUIERE
Marseille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Eklund S, Langstrom G, Lind T, Lundell L; LOTUS Trial Collaborators. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1969-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.626.
Cicala M, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, Ribolsi M. Proton pump inhibitor resistance, the real challenge in gastro-esophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 21;19(39):6529-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i39.6529.
Kellokumpu I, Voutilainen M, Haglund C, Farkkila M, Roberts PJ, Kautiainen H. Quality of life following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: assessing short-term and long-term outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 28;19(24):3810-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3810.
Marret H, Pierre F, Chapron C, Perrotin F, Body G, Lansac J. [Complications of laparoscopy caused by trocars. Preliminary study from the national registry of the French Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(4):405-12. French.
Rickenbacher N, Kotter T, Kochen MM, Scherer M, Blozik E. Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):143-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3140-z. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Mahmood Z, Byrne PJ, McMahon BP, Murphy EM, Arfin Q, Ravi N, Weir DG, Reynolds JV. Comparison of transesophageal endoscopic plication (TEP) with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in the treatment of uncomplicated reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):431-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00534.x.
Triadafilopoulos G. Stretta: a valuable endoscopic treatment modality for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7730-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7730.
Feretis C, Benakis P, Dimopoulos C, Dailianas A, Filalithis P, Stamou KM, Manouras A, Apostolidis N. Endoscopic implantation of Plexiglas (PMMA) microspheres for the treatment of GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Apr;53(4):423-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.113912.
Cicala M, Gabbrielli A, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, Ribolsi M, Caviglia R, Costamagna G. Effect of endoscopic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (Gatekeeper reflux repair system) on intraoesophageal dynamic characteristics of acid reflux. Gut. 2005 Feb;54(2):183-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.040501.
Wong RF, Davis TV, Peterson KA. Complications involving the mediastinum after injection of Enteryx for GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 May;61(6):753-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02645-8. No abstract available.
Chuttani R, Sud R, Sachdev G, Puri R, Kozarek R, Haber G, Pleskow D, Zaman M, Lembo A. A novel endoscopic full-thickness plicator for the treatment of GERD: A pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Nov;58(5):770-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02027-3.
Cadiere GB, Buset M, Muls V, Rajan A, Rosch T, Eckardt AJ, Weerts J, Bastens B, Costamagna G, Marchese M, Louis H, Mana F, Sermon F, Gawlicka AK, Daniel MA, Deviere J. Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1676-88. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9594-9.
Satodate H, Inoue H, Yoshida T, Usui S, Iwashita M, Fukami N, Shiokawa A, Kudo SE. Circumferential EMR of carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus: case report. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Aug;58(2):288-92. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.361. No abstract available.
Inoue H, Ito H, Ikeda H, Sato C, Sato H, Phalanusitthepha C, Hayee B, Eleftheriadis N, Kudo SE. Anti-reflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the absence of hiatus hernia: a pilot study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27(4):346-351.
Velanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR, Tapia FV, Harkabus MA. Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Sep;183(3):217-24.
Laquiere A, Trottier-Tellier F, Urena-Campos R, Lienne P, Lecomte L, Katsogiannou M, Penaranda G, Boustiere C. Evaluation of Antireflux Mucosectomy for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Medium-Term Results of a Pilot Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 21;2022:1606944. doi: 10.1155/2022/1606944. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-A01591-50
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.