Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-thoracotomy Pain

NCT ID: NCT04013815

Last Updated: 2020-03-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-01

Study Completion Date

2019-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Post-thoracotomy pain is one of the most severe forms of post-operative pain. Among the most common techniques for the management of post-thoracotomy pain, there are the intercostal nerve block, and a recently described block, the erector spinae plane block (ESP).To date, there are no studies that compare the efficacy of ESP block with other pain relief methods in acute post-thoracotomy pain. The objective of this randomized study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of these two techniques in the control of acute post-thoracotomy chest pain, block of erector spinae vs intrapleural intercostal block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Post-thoracotomy pain is one of the most severe forms of post-operative pain that can be attributed to muscle incision, rib retraction or resection, and damage to the intercostal nerves. Inadequate control of this post-operative pain can contribute to a deterioration of the respiratory function, with limitation of the ventilation, appearance of atelectasis, ineffective cough, and increased risk of infectious complications. Moreover, recent evidence shows that persistent pain after surgery, in addition to being responsible for chronic post-surgical pain syndrome, is associated with a delay in post-operative recovery and a return to normal daily life activities. The most common techniques for the management of post-thoracotomy pain are in addition to systemic intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural, paravertebral nerve block and intercostal nerve block. Although the thoracic epidural has been considered for years the gold standard for the control of post-operative pain following thoracotomy, it is not risk-free, requires an expert operator, and can be contraindicated in some categories of patients. The intercostal nerve block, performed through the injection of the local anesthetic in multiple intercostal spaces before performing thoracotomy, may be one of the alternatives to a thoracic epidural in terms of safety and efficacy and is technically easy and quick to perform. This block is found to be particularly effective in reducing post-operative pain when associated with a mini-thoracotomy, helping to improve the outcome of patients undergoing major lung resection. A technique of more recent description (2016) is the erector spinae plane block (ESP) . This interfascial block is performed in the posterior thoracic region homolaterally at the site of the intervention at the level of the T5 transverse process (fifth thoracic vertebra), the ultrasound marker of the block. The ESP block is easy and safe to perform thanks to the ultrasound-guided method and the absence of vascular-nerve structures at risk of damage in the vicinity of the injection site and allows analgesia of the posterior and anterolateral thoracic wall and of the axillary region. In fact, cadaveric studies have shown an anesthetic distribution both in the cranial caudal sense (T2-T8) along the fascia between erector spinae and large rhomboid, and in the anteroposterior direction, with the blockage of the spinal thoracic nerve roots. ESP block was described in the treatment of chronic chest pain in the first place, but was subsequently used as rescue therapy in acute post-thoracotomy pain; it has also been tested in upper abdominal surgery, performed bilaterally. Use in four cases of acute post video thoracoscopy pain management has also been described. Recently, some randomized controlled trials have been carried out that showed: greater analgesic efficacy of ESP compared to intravenous multimodal analgesia standard for the treatment of post-operative pain, with less recourse to rescue doses of morphine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, mastectomy and cardiac surgery. To date, there are no studies that compare its efficacy with other pain relief methods in acute post-thoracotomy pain. The objective of our study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of these two techniques in the control of acute post-thoracotomy chest pain, blockade of erector spinae vs intrapleural intercostal blockade.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

60 patients will be enrolled to undergo thoracotomy lung resection surgery.

The population will be divided into two groups based on the type of block made:

Group E: ESP block (n = 30)

Group I: Intercostal block (n = 30)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
patients and investigator checking the pain are not aware of which block has been performed

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group E

patients receiving the ESP block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

erector spinae plane block with ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The block is performed immediately before surgery. by an ultrasound guide, with the probe positioned longitudinally, the spinous process of T5 is identified. A peripheral block needle is inserted in the cephalo-caudal direction (caliber 21G and length 10 cm) and 3 ml of physiological solution are injected to confirm the injection site: fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the large rhomboid, near the tip of the transverse process of T5. Once the correct position of the needle tip has been confirmed, ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml is injected.

group I

patients receiving the intercostal nerve block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intercostal nerve block with ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intercostal nerve block will be performed by the surgeon at the time of thoracotomy from the 4th to the 8th intercostal space, by injecting 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine (4 ml for each space). The injection is performed at about 2-3 cm from the spine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

erector spinae plane block with ropivacaine

The block is performed immediately before surgery. by an ultrasound guide, with the probe positioned longitudinally, the spinous process of T5 is identified. A peripheral block needle is inserted in the cephalo-caudal direction (caliber 21G and length 10 cm) and 3 ml of physiological solution are injected to confirm the injection site: fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the large rhomboid, near the tip of the transverse process of T5. Once the correct position of the needle tip has been confirmed, ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml is injected.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intercostal nerve block with ropivacaine

The intercostal nerve block will be performed by the surgeon at the time of thoracotomy from the 4th to the 8th intercostal space, by injecting 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine (4 ml for each space). The injection is performed at about 2-3 cm from the spine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing thoracotomy lung resection surgery between 45 and 80 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients allergic to the drugs used in the study
* Patients with diabetic neuropathy
* Patients with severe hepatic or renal insufficiency
* emergent surgery
* Age \<45 years or\> 80 years
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Silvia Fiorelli

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sant Andrea Hospital

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Loan WB, Morrison JD. The incidence and severity of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth. 1967 Sep;39(9):695-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/39.9.695. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6051231 (View on PubMed)

Sabanathan S, Eng J, Mearns AJ. Alterations in respiratory mechanics following thoracotomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990 Jun;35(3):144-50.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2203902 (View on PubMed)

Nunn JF. Effects of anaesthesia on respiration. Br J Anaesth. 1990 Jul;65(1):54-62. doi: 10.1093/bja/65.1.54. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2200485 (View on PubMed)

Joshi GP, Ogunnaike BO. Consequences of inadequate postoperative pain relief and chronic persistent postoperative pain. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;23(1):21-36. doi: 10.1016/j.atc.2004.11.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15763409 (View on PubMed)

Sabanathan S, Smith PJ, Pradhan GN, Hashimi H, Eng JB, Mearns AJ. Continuous intercostal nerve block for pain relief after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Oct;46(4):425-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64657-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3178353 (View on PubMed)

D'Andrilli A, Ibrahim M, Ciccone AM, Venuta F, De Giacomo T, Massullo D, Pinto G, Rendina EA. Intrapleural intercostal nerve block associated with mini-thoracotomy improves pain control after major lung resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 May;29(5):790-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16481188 (View on PubMed)

Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: A case series. Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28919152 (View on PubMed)

Luis-Navarro JC, Seda-Guzman M, Luis-Moreno C, Lopez-Romero JL. The erector spinae plane block in 4 cases of video-assisted thoracic surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr;65(4):204-208. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 11. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29336785 (View on PubMed)

Tulgar S, Kapakli MS, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Ozer Z. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29913392 (View on PubMed)

Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29980005 (View on PubMed)

Krishna SN, Chauhan S, Bhoi D, Kaushal B, Hasija S, Sangdup T, Bisoi AK. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Acute Post-Surgical Pain in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Feb;33(2):368-375. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.05.050. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30055991 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.