Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Perioperative Analgesia in Spine Surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04123106

Last Updated: 2021-08-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-11

Study Completion Date

2020-09-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative pain still represents an important perioperative issue, affecting more than 80% of patients undergoing surgery. A suboptimal pain management doesn't just affects quality of life, but can compromise rehabilitation plan, increase morbidity and determine the development of chronic pain. Last but not least, far from being just an obligation for physicians, a good analgesia is a fundamental right of every patient.

In order to meet these important demands, a great number of guidelines has been provided, all of these underlying that the centerpiece of postoperative analgesia lies in the multimodality management, thereby combining different medications and different ways of delivering them, with the aim of targeting distinct receptor systems and improving efficacy, while limiting side effects.

In 2018, the investigators conducted a case-series analysis on 17 patients undergoing lumbar surgery to find out the role of Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet System (SSTS) in a multimodal analgesia regimen. Patients expressed a good pain relief, with most benefit during physiotherapy sessions and early discharges, in absence of side effects. Since then, SSTS has been part of regular clinical practice in our hospital.

The aim of this randomized trial is to examine the analgesic efficacy and the opioid sparing role in spine surgery of a recently developed regional anesthesia technique, the Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP block), as opposed to Local Anaesthetic (LA) wound infiltration.

The latter is a widespread, simple and unexpensive mean of providing postoperative analgesia. On the other hand, ESP block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plain block, in which LA is injected below the erector spine muscle, closer to costotransverse foramina and origin of dorsal and ventral rami. It does provide an efficient multidermatomal sensory blockade (according to craniocaudal LA spread), with the advantage of being simple and safe.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative SPINAL Fracture Spondylolisthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ESP block

Ultrasound-guided, performed below erector spinae plane (ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mL each side).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ESP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESP block bilaterally performed at the level of the surgical site prior to surgery.

Wound infiltration

Ropivacaine 0.5% 20-40 mL, performed by surgeon.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Wound infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Wound infiltration performed at the surgical site at the end of surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ESP block

ESP block bilaterally performed at the level of the surgical site prior to surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Wound infiltration

Wound infiltration performed at the surgical site at the end of surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for lumbar fusion surgery on account of vertebral fractures or degenerative spondylolisthesis.
* Patients consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Opioid tolerance;
* Documented sleep apnoea or home oxygen therapy;
* History of alcohol or drug abuse;
* Patients with an allergy or hypersensitivity to opioids.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Prof. Marco Rossi

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. Roberta Nestorini

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. Mariangela Di Muro

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

VERGARI ALESSANDRO

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico A. Gemelli

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESP01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.