Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Perioperative Analgesia in Spine Surgery.
NCT ID: NCT04123106
Last Updated: 2021-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-11
2020-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to meet these important demands, a great number of guidelines has been provided, all of these underlying that the centerpiece of postoperative analgesia lies in the multimodality management, thereby combining different medications and different ways of delivering them, with the aim of targeting distinct receptor systems and improving efficacy, while limiting side effects.
In 2018, the investigators conducted a case-series analysis on 17 patients undergoing lumbar surgery to find out the role of Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet System (SSTS) in a multimodal analgesia regimen. Patients expressed a good pain relief, with most benefit during physiotherapy sessions and early discharges, in absence of side effects. Since then, SSTS has been part of regular clinical practice in our hospital.
The aim of this randomized trial is to examine the analgesic efficacy and the opioid sparing role in spine surgery of a recently developed regional anesthesia technique, the Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP block), as opposed to Local Anaesthetic (LA) wound infiltration.
The latter is a widespread, simple and unexpensive mean of providing postoperative analgesia. On the other hand, ESP block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plain block, in which LA is injected below the erector spine muscle, closer to costotransverse foramina and origin of dorsal and ventral rami. It does provide an efficient multidermatomal sensory blockade (according to craniocaudal LA spread), with the advantage of being simple and safe.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Block vs Morphine in Vertebral Fixation
NCT04729049
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-thoracotomy Pain
NCT04013815
Ultrasound-guided ESP Block vs. Wound Infiltration in Lumbar Surgery: A Comparative Analysis (ESP:Erector Spinae Plane)
NCT06567964
Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (ESP) for Postoperative Pain in Lumbo-sacral Spine Surgery
NCT04233736
Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block in Posterior Thoraco- Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery
NCT04370951
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESP block
Ultrasound-guided, performed below erector spinae plane (ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mL each side).
ESP block
ESP block bilaterally performed at the level of the surgical site prior to surgery.
Wound infiltration
Ropivacaine 0.5% 20-40 mL, performed by surgeon.
Wound infiltration
Wound infiltration performed at the surgical site at the end of surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ESP block
ESP block bilaterally performed at the level of the surgical site prior to surgery.
Wound infiltration
Wound infiltration performed at the surgical site at the end of surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Documented sleep apnoea or home oxygen therapy;
* History of alcohol or drug abuse;
* Patients with an allergy or hypersensitivity to opioids.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prof. Marco Rossi
UNKNOWN
Dr. Roberta Nestorini
UNKNOWN
Dr. Mariangela Di Muro
UNKNOWN
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
VERGARI ALESSANDRO
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Policlinico A. Gemelli
Rome, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ESP01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.