Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for Postoperative Analgesia After Caesarean Section

NCT ID: NCT05348083

Last Updated: 2023-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-15

Study Completion Date

2022-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Management of pain after caesarean section represents an important anesthesiologic issue, since it is often suboptimal, leading to delayed functional recovery and chronic pain. Currently, the postoperative analgesic strategy mostly relies on intrathecal morphine (ITM) and multimodal analgesic regimen. Recently, the need for alterative opioid sparing techniques is emerging. Paraspinal fascial plane blocks, as quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) performed at T9 level, have therefore been proposed as alternatives to ITM, because of their demonstrated effect on visceral and somatic pain.

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy, the feasibility and safety of bilateral ESPB compared to bilateral QLB for the management of postoperative pain after ceasarean section conducted under spinal anesthesia without ITM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Post Operative Cesarean Section Complications Anesthesia, Local Obstetric Anesthesia Problems

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ESPB

A prospective cohort of 25 patients ASA 2 (according to American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification) with normal singleton pregnancy, scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia without intrathecal morphine, who underwent bilateral echo-guided ESPB at T9 level at the end of surgery.

ESPB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Echo-guided bilateral ESPB performed at T9 level at the end of surgery with a mixture of ropivacaine 0.375% and epinephrine 5 mcg/mL 20 mL each side.

p-QLB

A historical cohort of 25 patients ASA 2 (according to American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification) with normal singleton pregnancy, scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia without intrathecal morphine, who underwent bilateral echo-guided p-QLB at the end of surgery.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ESPB

Echo-guided bilateral ESPB performed at T9 level at the end of surgery with a mixture of ropivacaine 0.375% and epinephrine 5 mcg/mL 20 mL each side.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patients ASA 2 with normal singleton pregnancy, scheduled for elective caesarean section without intrathecal morphine, who underwent bilateral ESPB at the end of surgery an who gave informed consent to data collection.

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications to spinal anesthesia;
* Contraindications to or a history of opioid dependence;
* Allergy to local anesthetics, acetaminophen, NSAIDs
* Inability to understand pain assessment scales or to use Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) pump;
* Patient refusal.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ZANFINI BRUNO ANTONIO

Physician Anesthesiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4412

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.