ESP Block, CNP and QoL After VATS

NCT ID: NCT04737902

Last Updated: 2021-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is an adequate alternative for pain management after video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS). The incidence of postoperative chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) and the quality of life (QoL) in patients with ESPB after VATS remain unknown. We hypothesised that patients with ESPB would have a low incidence of acute and CNP and would report a good QoL up to three months after VATS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We, therefore, performed this prospective observational study. The a priori primary outcome was incidence of CNP three months postoperatively (POP) in patients undergoing VATS surgery with ESPB as the regional anaesthesia technique. The secondary outcome was to describe pain control at PACU, 12 and 24 hours POP and QoL reported up to three months after surgery. We hypothesised that patients with ESPB would have a low incidence of acute and CNP and report a good QoL.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VATS with ESPB

Study subjects underwent anaesthesia and VATS without a change in their routine care. At the end of the surgery, an erector spinae plane block was performed for acute pain control following our institutional protocol for perioperative care.

Erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Unilateral ESP block was performed between T3 and T7 levels depending on the thoracic surgical incision. The patient is placed in lateral decubitus position, under sterile conditions, a high frequency (6-15 MHz) linear-array transducer (Sonosite® Edge II, Bothell, USA) was placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation 2 cm from the posterior midline to visualise the tips of the transverse processes deep to the erector spinae muscle (ESM). A 21 G, 50 mm or 100 mm needle (Pajunk UniPlex NanoLine; Germany) was advanced in-plane with the ultrasound beam. The needle tip was directed to the plane between the transverse process and the posterior fascia of the ESM. Correct needle tip location was confirmed by ultrasound visualisation of linear fluid spread in the fascial plane. The injection of 0.5 to 1 ml of bupivacaine was 0.5% with epinephrine 5 µg/ml; then, a total of 20-30 ml of the same local anaesthetic was administered.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erector spinae plane block

Unilateral ESP block was performed between T3 and T7 levels depending on the thoracic surgical incision. The patient is placed in lateral decubitus position, under sterile conditions, a high frequency (6-15 MHz) linear-array transducer (Sonosite® Edge II, Bothell, USA) was placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation 2 cm from the posterior midline to visualise the tips of the transverse processes deep to the erector spinae muscle (ESM). A 21 G, 50 mm or 100 mm needle (Pajunk UniPlex NanoLine; Germany) was advanced in-plane with the ultrasound beam. The needle tip was directed to the plane between the transverse process and the posterior fascia of the ESM. Correct needle tip location was confirmed by ultrasound visualisation of linear fluid spread in the fascial plane. The injection of 0.5 to 1 ml of bupivacaine was 0.5% with epinephrine 5 µg/ml; then, a total of 20-30 ml of the same local anaesthetic was administered.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who underwent VATS and required at least one day of hospital stay after surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with mental or physical limitation to answer the questionnaires.
* patients who required mechanical ventilation.
* patients who required surgery conversion to thoracotomy.
* patients who declined consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Universitario San Ignacio

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lorena Díaz-Bohada, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario San Ignacio

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario

Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bayman EO, Parekh KR, Keech J, Selte A, Brennan TJ. A Prospective Study of Chronic Pain after Thoracic Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2017 May;126(5):938-951. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001576.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28248713 (View on PubMed)

Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27501016 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMCIE-0043-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT04118101 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3