Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-25
2021-02-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The literature reveals successful case reports denoting the use of ESPB for pain control in cases of acute kidney transplant,percutaneous nephrolithomy, abdominal surgeries including laparoscopic and open nephrectomy, and nephrectomy in the pediatric population.
The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study is to investigate the efficacy of ESPB for pain control in adult patients undergoing open renal surgery through a flank incision with respect to pain scores, postoperative analgesia consumption and patient satisfaction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT04110210
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT03538496
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgeries
NCT05247021
Ultrasound-guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Open Nephrectomy
NCT04947644
Evaluation of Erector Spina Plane Block(ESPB)'s Effectiveness on Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT05261581
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Anesthetic technique:
A preoperative assessment, including a history, physical examination, review of laboratory data, and assignment of ASA classification will be performed on all patients prior to the procedure. After premedication with intravenous midazolam 2 mg, patients will be transferred to the operating room.
Standard monitors such as noninvasive blood pressure, electrocardiography (ECG), and pulse oximetry (SpO2) will be attached. Anesthesia will be induced using propofol 1-2 mg/kg, fentanyl 1-2 µg/kg and sevoflurane. After adequate manual ventilation, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg will be administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Ventilation will be started with oxygen and medical air (FiO2 = 0.6). Patients will be positioned in the lateral position to perform the ESPB and for preparation for surgery.
Erector SpinaePlane Block technique:
After skin sterilization and draping, a high-frequency linear array ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a transverse orientation to identify the tip of the T7 transverse process. The tip of the transverse process will be centered on the ultrasound screen and the probe will then be rotated into a longitudinal orientation to produce a parasagittal view, in which the following layers will be visible superficial to the acoustic shadows of the transverse processes: skin and subcutaneous tissue, trapezius and erector spinae muscle.The rhomboid major muscle has its lower border a tthe T5-6 vertebral level and its absence will be used as additional confirmation that the T7 transverse process is being viewed. An echogenic 22-G block needle will be inserted in-plane to the ultrasound beam in a cranial-to-caudal direction until contact is made with the T7 transverse process. Correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle will confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml normal saline and seeing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process without distending the muscle.
ESPB group:
A total of 25 ml bupivacaine 0.5% will be injected into the ESP.
Control group:
The ESPB will not be performed. Surgical technique and postoperative care will follow standard local clinical practice.
Pain management:
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score will be used immediately postoperatively and then at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h. Scores (1-3) are considered mild pain, (4-6) moderate pain and (7-10) severe pain. Rescue analgesia with intravenous pethidine (25 mg) will be prescribed if the patient's resting NRS score is more than three or on patient demand. Additional intravenous doses of 25 mg of pethidine will be given if needed to achieve a score below 4. The second rescue analgesic plan will be intravenous ketorolac 30 mg diluted in 100 ml normal saline and administered slowly, if NRS remained persistently \>3 after 15 min of the first rescue analgesic administration.
Data collection
1. Age
2. Sex
3. BMI
4. ASA Classification
5. Intraoperative and postoperative arterial blood pressure
6. Intraoperative and postoperativeheart rate
7. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score immediately postoperatively and then at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h.
8. Postoperative analgesia consumption
9. The overall degree of patient satisfaction will be assessed using a three-point scale (good, moderate, and bad) on the first postoperative day.
10. Block related complications (e.g Pneumothorax)
11. Postoperative opioid related complications (e.g. Nausea, vomiting, constipation, sedation)
Statistics:
The patients will be randomly divided into two groups; group (E) and group (C). Forty-six patients will be prospectively enrolled for each study of patients who had been diagnosed to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the groups are equal with Power calculations suggested that a minimum of 23 subjects per group will be required to detect 10% difference in time for first rescue analgesia between groups (taking type I or α error of 5%, type II or β error of 20% and Standard Deviation=10). To be on a safer side, patients will be included in each group (n=23).
Statistical analyses will be performed using JMP ver. 12.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The number of patients who will be reported complications corresponding percentage (%) for nominal variables; for continuous variables with normal distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test will be used for nonparametric variables. The level of significance for both the tests set at p\<0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESPB group
A total of 25 ml bupivacaine 0.5% willbe injected into the ESP.
ESPB block
A total of 25 ml bupivacaine 0.5% will be injected into the ESP.
Control group
The ESPB will not be performed.
control
no ESPB will be given.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ESPB block
A total of 25 ml bupivacaine 0.5% will be injected into the ESP.
control
no ESPB will be given.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA I-II.
* Patient is scheduled to perform an elective open renal surgery through a flank incision.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy.
* Patient is allergic to bupivacaine local anesthetic.
* Impaired coagulation (Platelet count\< 150,000 cells/mcl and/or INR ≥ 1.4).
* Infection at site of injection.
* Prior same side flank surgery.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Theodor Bilharz Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Moshira sayed mohamed
Anesthesia and Intensive care clinical researcher
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Moshira S Mohamed, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Theodor Bilharz Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Theodor Bilharz research institute
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TBRI 2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.