Evaluation of Methods for Measuring Food Reward and Food-related Behavior in Healthy Individuals

NCT ID: NCT03986619

Last Updated: 2019-09-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-16

Study Completion Date

2019-08-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Most of the decisions and actions affecting energy balance are driven by implicit and explicit motivational processes. In modern obesogenic environment where highly palatable and energy-dense foods are easily available, it is of great interest to increase the understanding of both implicit and explicit processes of food-related behavior.

The aim of the present study is to examine whether biometric signatures in response to visual food stimuli during the already validated Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ) correlate with liking, wanting, food choice, or subsequent ad libitum food intake of those foods as assessed by the LFPQ and an ad libitum buffet meal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Human behaviour including food reward plays a pivotal role in appetite regulation and the type and amount of food eaten. Food reward is a driver of eating behaviour and is defined as the momentary value of a food to the individual at the time of ingestion. Food reward contains the components of liking and wanting that can exist both with (explicit) and without (implicit) conscious awareness. Most of the daily decisions and actions affecting energy balance are driven by the non-conscious mind. Non-conscious processes are characterised by being unintentional and without awareness of the effects of triggering stimuli, e.g. food items. Contrary, conscious processes are typically assessed through participants' self-reports but limited by accuracy and desire to provide socially desirable answers. In a world of plenty where foods are always easily available with an overtly representation of highly palatable and energy-dense foods it is of great interest to understand the role of the non-conscious mind as a driver of food choice and intake. Intake of highly palatable and energy-dense foods is related to excess energy intake, high body mass index and weight gain. A possible explanation for this is that these foods are overall more rewarding and as a result of this, palatable.

A few previous studies have applied the use of innovative biometric measures, i.e. eye tracking, galvanic skin response, and facial expression to examine behavioural aspects of food intake that are without conscious awareness. However, there is a lack of studies examining how biometric responses to different food groups varying in energy density and palatability correlate with outcomes related to components of food reward and food intake. Therefore, in the present explorative study the above-mentioned biometric measurements will be combined with an existing validated method, the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ), developed to examine both non-conscious and conscious components of food reward. The LFPQ assess four factors related to food reward within four combined food categories: food choice, implicit and explicit wanting, and explicit liking for high-fat sweet foods, low-fat sweet foods, high-fat savoury foods, and low-fat savoury foods. Biometric measurements of eye tracking can provide measures of attention, measurements of galvanic skin response can provide measures of arousal, and facial expressions analyses can provide information on emotional responses in response to selected stimuli, which in this study constitute pictures of food items. Furthermore, the study will include a taste task including an ad libitum intake of test foods in order to examine responses to actual food intake and to compare these responses to biometric responses to visual food stimuli.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Participants

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: from ≥30 to ≤70 years of age
* BMI: from 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to understand the informed consent and the study procedures;
* Allergic to the food items included in the taste test
* Self-reported history of an eating disorder in the past three years
* Self-reported weight change (\>5 kg) within three months prior to inclusion
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aalborg University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

IMotions A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kristine Færch, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

Gentofte Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pedersen H, Diaz LJ, Clemmensen KKB, Jensen MM, Jorgensen ME, Finlayson G, Quist JS, Vistisen D, Faerch K. Predicting Food Intake from Food Reward and Biometric Responses to Food Cues in Adults with Normal Weight Using Machine Learning. J Nutr. 2022 Jun 9;152(6):1574-1581. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac053.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35325189 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-18026293_substudy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Energy Turnover and Appetite
NCT05365685 COMPLETED NA