Sampling in ARDS Patients Under Inhaled Sedation

NCT ID: NCT03964155

Last Updated: 2021-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-01

Study Completion Date

2021-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to compare the protein composition of simultaneously collected undiluted pulmonary edema fluid and AnaConDa-S ® fluid from patients with ARDS.

In a previous pilot randomized controlled trial, in patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the use of inhaled sevoflurane improved oxygenation and decreased levels of a marker of lung epithelial injury (soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products, sRAGE) and of some inflammatory markers (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α), compared to intravenous midazolam. These results reinforce those from previously published preclinical studies as they suggest a protective effect of sevoflurane from alveolar/systemic inflammation and from reduced epithelial injury and/or improved alveolar fluid clearance, as assessed by plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE). The results from available studies support the safe use of sevoflurane inhalation through dedicated device is well tolerated, with no major adverse effect, e.g. on renal function or respiratory mechanics, in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), including those with ARDS.

Because the investigators group frequently uses sevoflurane in patients with ARDS and are interested in developing further research on the effects of inhaled sedation in ARDS, the current study has been designed to verify whether the same concept could be applied to the filter the investigators use to vaporize sevoflurane in their ICUs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS (within 24 hours of onset) and already receiving inhaled sevoflurane for sedation as a current practice in participating centers will be enrolled in this observational study.

After an exposure duration of at least 12 hours, a sample of directly-aspirated, undiluted pulmonary edema fluid will be collected concurrently with AnaConDa-S®filter collection. This sample will be the only specific intervention of this study.

Patient data prospectively collected from the medical record will include demographics, ARDS risk factor, chest x-ray, ventilator settings at the time of AnaConDa-S ® filter collection, hospital and ICU length of stay and hospital mortality. Murray's lung injury score and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score will be calculated from data already available in the medical record.

AnaConDa-S ® filters will transported to the laboratory on ice and centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 10 minutes to collect condensed fluid that will be subsequently aliquoted and stored at -80°C for further analysis. Undiluted pulmonary edema fluid will be centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 10 minutes. Supernatants will be aliquoted and stored at - 80°C. Levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, soluble TNF-receptor 1, angiopoietin-2, and sRAGE will be measured in duplicate in both types of fluid with Multiplex.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Distress Respiratory

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Analysize correlation between sample from undiluted pulmonary edema andsample from AnaConDa-S® filter from patients presenting ARDS since 24 hours and sedated with inhaled sevoflurane.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

The investigators and personals in charge of measuring protein markers in this study will be unaware of the fluid type (either AnaConDa-S® fluid,or undiluted pulmonary edema fluid or plasma). In addition, the study statistician will also be blinded during statistical analyses.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with SDRA

Patients within 24 hours from meeting the Berlin criteria for moderate or severe ARDS and receiving inhaled sedation with sevoflurane

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

After an exposure duration of at least 12 hours, a sample of directly-aspirated, undiluted pulmonary edema fluid will be collected concurrently with AnaConDa-S® filter collection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sample

After an exposure duration of at least 12 hours, a sample of directly-aspirated, undiluted pulmonary edema fluid will be collected concurrently with AnaConDa-S® filter collection.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients within 24 hours from meeting the Berlin criteria for moderate or severe ARDS and receiving inhaled sedation with sevoflurane will be eligible for inclusion into the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients \<18 years
* Lack of deferred informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthieu Jabaudon

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

CHU

Reims, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A02596-49

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RBHP 2018 JABAUDON 2 - ANAISS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of PEEP Trials on Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in ARDS Patients
NCT06823804 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2/PHASE3