Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-01
2018-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PECTORAL PLANE BLOCK COMPAIRED TO ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK IN MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA FOR MASTECTOMY PATIENTS IN SOUTH ASIAN POPULATION -A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIAL
NCT07197177
Erector Spina Plane Block Versus Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Post Mastectomy Analgesia
NCT04108715
Intraoperative Pectoral Block vs IV Analgesia for Pain After Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT07257874
Does Local Morphine Add to Local Anesthetics in Serratus Anterior Plane Block Has a System Analgesic Effect?
NCT02962024
PECS Block vs. Multimodal Analgesia for Prevention of Persistent Postoperative Pain in Breast Surgery
NCT03084536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Place and Duration: Department of Anesthesiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital Lahore (SKMCH), from February 2017 to December 2017
Methods: 120 patients more than 18 years, ASA I and II, planned for unilateral elective modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either general anesthesia plus Pectoral Nerve I, II and serratus (PECS) block (n = 60) or general anesthesia alone (n = 60). Pain score at fixed intervals was measured using Numeric Pain Rating Score (NPRS) after surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PECS block group
20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was infiltrated between pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle and the spread was visualised on the ultrasound screen. similarly, in Serratus plane block, ultrasound probe was placed over the mid-axillary region of the thoracic cage in a sagittal plane. Ribs were identified inferiorly and laterally, until the identification of the 3rd rib in the mid axillary line. 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was infiltrated in between Serratus anterior muscle and Latissimus Dorsi muscle
PECS block
After the induction of general anesthesia, PECS block was administered patients via ultrasound guided technique. We used Mindray M7 Portable ultrasound system using linear probe with (5-10 MHz) frequency. After cleaning the infra clavicular and axillary region with 2% chlorhexidine in 70% Alcohol solution, ultrasound probe was placed in the infraclavicular region and pectoral major and minor were identified. After identification of the landmarks, 20 gauge 50mm Visoplex needle was inserted in-plane direction. 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (within the safe limit of its dose) was infiltrated between pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle and the spread was visualized on the ultrasound screen.
Control group
Patient were given multimodal analgesia without the regional block
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PECS block
After the induction of general anesthesia, PECS block was administered patients via ultrasound guided technique. We used Mindray M7 Portable ultrasound system using linear probe with (5-10 MHz) frequency. After cleaning the infra clavicular and axillary region with 2% chlorhexidine in 70% Alcohol solution, ultrasound probe was placed in the infraclavicular region and pectoral major and minor were identified. After identification of the landmarks, 20 gauge 50mm Visoplex needle was inserted in-plane direction. 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (within the safe limit of its dose) was infiltrated between pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle and the spread was visualized on the ultrasound screen.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* (ASA) I and II
* Scheduled to undergo elective unilateral mastectomy or Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) under general anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
2. history of allergy to bupivacaine
3. contraindications to regional anaesthesia (coagulopathy and local infection),
4. BMI \> 40 kg/m2,
5. patient scheduled for bilateral mastectomies
6. use of chronic pain medications
7. history of illicit drugs or alcohol abuse and history of psychiatric problems.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hammad Najeeb
Fellow in Anesthesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Menhas R, Umer S. Breast Cancer among Pakistani Women. Iran J Public Health. 2015 Apr;44(4):586-7. No abstract available.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
Andersen KG, Duriaud HM, Jensen HE, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Predictive factors for the development of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2413-2422. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000298.
Afonso AM, Newman MI, Seeley N, Hutchins J, Smith KL, Mena G, Selber JC, Saint-Cyr MH, Gadsden JC. Multimodal Analgesia in Breast Surgical Procedures: Technical and Pharmacological Considerations for Liposomal Bupivacaine Use. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 15;5(9):e1480. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001480. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Richebe P, Rivat C, Liu SS. Perioperative or postoperative nerve block for preventive analgesia: should we care about the timing of our regional anesthesia? Anesth Analg. 2013 May;116(5):969-970. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828843c9. No abstract available.
Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Syal K, Chandel A. Comparison of the post-operative analgesic effect of paravertebral block, pectoral nerve block and local infiltration in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomised double-blind trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;61(8):643-648. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_81_17.
Blanco R. The 'pecs block': a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):847-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06838.x. No abstract available.
Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
Porzionato A, Macchi V, Stecco C, Loukas M, Tubbs RS, De Caro R. Surgical anatomy of the pectoral nerves and the pectoral musculature. Clin Anat. 2012 Jul;25(5):559-75. doi: 10.1002/ca.21301. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
Ullah H, Samad K, Khan FA. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block versus parenteral analgesia for postoperative pain relief after major shoulder surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 4;2014(2):CD007080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007080.pub2.
Akram M, Farooqi FM, Irshad M, Faraz Ul Hassan S, Awais SM. Role of addition of Dexamethasone and Ketorolac to lignocaine intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier's Block) to improve tourniquet tolerance and post-operative analgesia in hand and forearm surgery. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;65(11 Suppl 3):S128-31.
Shah AA, Rasool A, Alam MA, Naseem Y, Rasool M, Hussain A, Jadoon S, Shah EH, Malik AA, Ahmed N; Salahudin. Efficacy Of Phenylephrine Infusion Verses Colloid Preloading In Resolving Hypotension Due To Spinal Anaesthesia During Caesarean Section. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):377-380.
Thomas M, Philip FA, Mathew AP, Jagathnath Krishna KM. Intraoperative pectoral nerve block (Pec) for breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul-Sep;34(3):318-323. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_191_17.
Madabushi R, Tewari S, Gautam SK, Agarwal A, Agarwal A. Serratus anterior plane block: a new analgesic technique for post-thoracotomy pain. Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):E421-4.
Tighe SQ, Karmakar MK. Serratus plane block: do we need to learn another technique for thoracic wall blockade? Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1103-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.12423. Epub 2013 Sep 14. No abstract available.
Naja MZ, Ziade MF, Lonnqvist PA. Nerve-stimulator guided paravertebral blockade vs. general anaesthesia for breast surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Nov;20(11):897-903. doi: 10.1017/s0265021503001443.
Terheggen MA, Wille F, Borel Rinkes IH, Ionescu TI, Knape JT. Paravertebral blockade for minor breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002 Feb;94(2):355-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200202000-00023.
Coveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, Iglehart JD, Leight GS, Steele SM, Lyerly HK. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer: experience in 156 cases. Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):496-501. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00008.
Lonnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):813-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06148.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-15-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.