Preoperative Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block in Decreasing Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT06036979

Last Updated: 2024-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breast cancer is considered the commonest malignancy affecting women with an incidence exceeding one million cases per year. Although it has a favorable prognosis with improved lines of treatment, some complications may still disturb the patient's life quality. One of these complications is post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) .Regional Anaesthesia (RA) is considered one of the most effective methods in reducing acute pain after breast surgeries, these include pectoral nerves block (PECS), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), paravertebral plane block (PVPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) . Our study is aiming for comparing the effect of preoperative PVPB versus preoperative ESPB in the prevention of PMPS in patients undergoing unilateral breast surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is considered the commonest malignancy affecting women with an incidence exceeding one million cases per year. Although it has a favorable prognosis with improved lines of treatment, some complications may still disturb the patient's life quality. One of these complications is post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) ¹.

The International Association for Study of Pain (IASP) defines PMPS as chronic pain that persists more than 3 months in the anterior thorax, axilla \&/or upper arm ². It is usually neuropathic in nature includes altered sensations such as dysesthesia, hypo or hyperesthesia, allodynia or particular qualities of dysesthesia e.g burning, dull aching sensations. It is usually of at least moderate intensity and may be either continuous or intermittent pain ³.

The etiology and mechanism of PMPS remain incompletely clear yet. Some risk factors are believed to be associated with PMPS, including the presence and intensity of postoperative pain, the type of surgery, younger women, prior history of other types of pain and adjuvant therapies like chemo or radiotherapy ⁴.

Regional Anaesthesia (RA) is considered one of the most effective methods in reducing acute pain after breast surgeries, these include pectoral nerves block (PECS), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), paravertebral plane block (PVPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) ⁵. Theoretically RA can minimize the development of PMPS by decreasing the afferent nociceptive input and central sensitization during the perioperative period, However clinically the role of RA in preventing PMPS is still under investigations ⁶.

PVPB includes injecting local anesthetic in the paravertebral space where the spinal nerves exit from the intervertebral foraminae. Paravertebral space is bounded by the parietal pleura, superior costotransverse ligament, vertebrae, intervertebral foraminae and the heads of the ribs ⁷. While ESPB includes injection of the local anesthetic in the fascial plane between the vertebral transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle ⁸.

Many studies were done in order to evaluate the efficacy of either ESPB or PVB in controlling acute postoperative pain after breast surgeries, some studies compared between them in controlling acute postoperative pain after breast surgeries ⁹. Also there are some studies that evaluate the effect of either ESPB or PVPB in the prevention of PMPS after breast surgeries ¹⁰, but still the comparison between the effect of preoperative ESPB versus the effect of preoperative PVPB in the prevention of PMPS in patients undergoing breast surgeries is still under investigated.

Our study is aiming for comparing the effect of preoperative PVPB versus preoperative ESPB in the prevention of PMPS in patients undergoing unilateral breast surgeries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paravertebral Block Group

This group will receive combined general anaesthesia with preoperative ultrasound guide paravertebral plane block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paravertebral plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

With the patients are placed in the sitting position, counting down from C7 spinous process, a high frequency linear ultrasound probe is placed on the spinous process in the parasagittal plane at T5 level and then is slided laterally 2-3 cm to make the transverse processes clearly visualized . Under aseptic conditions, a 22-gauge block needle (50mm, B.Braun, Germany) is inserted using in-plane technique toward the paravertebral space, immediately above the pleura and below the superior costotransverse ligament. The position of the needle is confirmed by the descent of the pleura when injecting 2 to 3 ml of saline solution for hydrolocalization. Then 0.3ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% is injected under ultrasound guidance. Block success is defined as reduced sensitivity to cold and pinprick stimuli as compared with the contralateral side 20 minutes after local anesthetic injection.

Erector Spinae Block Group

This group will receive combined general anaesthesia with preoperative ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

With the patients are placed in the sitting position, counting down from C7 spinous process, a high frequency linear ultrasound probe is placed on the spinous process in the parasagittal plane at T5 level and then is slided laterally 2-3 cm to make the tips of the transverse processes clearly visualized . The following muscles seen from superficial to deep layer are trapezius, rhomboid major and erector spinae muscles. Under aseptic conditions, a 22-gauge block needle (50mm, B.Braun, Germany) is inserted using in-plane technique to reach the interfascial plane between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle. Following confirmation of the accurate position of the needle tip with 3-5 ml normal saline solution, 0.3ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% is injected under ultrasound guidance. Block success is defined as reduced sensitivity to cold and pinprick stimuli as compared with the contralateral side 20 minutes after local anesthetic injection.

Control Group

This group will receive balanced general anesthesia using intravenous (0.1mg/kg) morphine, 30 mg ketorlac and 1 gm paracetamol).

Group Type OTHER

Intravenous morphine, ketorlac and paracetamol

Intervention Type DRUG

• In the control group only we add 10mg intravenous morphine, 30 mg intravenous ketorlac and 1 gm intravenous paracetamol for analgesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paravertebral plane block

With the patients are placed in the sitting position, counting down from C7 spinous process, a high frequency linear ultrasound probe is placed on the spinous process in the parasagittal plane at T5 level and then is slided laterally 2-3 cm to make the transverse processes clearly visualized . Under aseptic conditions, a 22-gauge block needle (50mm, B.Braun, Germany) is inserted using in-plane technique toward the paravertebral space, immediately above the pleura and below the superior costotransverse ligament. The position of the needle is confirmed by the descent of the pleura when injecting 2 to 3 ml of saline solution for hydrolocalization. Then 0.3ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% is injected under ultrasound guidance. Block success is defined as reduced sensitivity to cold and pinprick stimuli as compared with the contralateral side 20 minutes after local anesthetic injection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Erector spinae plane block

With the patients are placed in the sitting position, counting down from C7 spinous process, a high frequency linear ultrasound probe is placed on the spinous process in the parasagittal plane at T5 level and then is slided laterally 2-3 cm to make the tips of the transverse processes clearly visualized . The following muscles seen from superficial to deep layer are trapezius, rhomboid major and erector spinae muscles. Under aseptic conditions, a 22-gauge block needle (50mm, B.Braun, Germany) is inserted using in-plane technique to reach the interfascial plane between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle. Following confirmation of the accurate position of the needle tip with 3-5 ml normal saline solution, 0.3ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% is injected under ultrasound guidance. Block success is defined as reduced sensitivity to cold and pinprick stimuli as compared with the contralateral side 20 minutes after local anesthetic injection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intravenous morphine, ketorlac and paracetamol

• In the control group only we add 10mg intravenous morphine, 30 mg intravenous ketorlac and 1 gm intravenous paracetamol for analgesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PVPB ESPB IV analgesics

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 60 years old.
* Female patients ASA ΙΙ, ΙΙΙ.
* Female patients scheduled for unilateral breast surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal.
* Patients have sepsis
* Patients known to have allergy against local anesthetics.
* Patients with prior surgery in areas above or below the clavicle or in the axillary region.
* Patients with opioid dependence, alcohol or drug abuse.
* Patient with coagulopathy.
* Patients with psychiatric illness that prevent them from proper pain perception and assessment.
* ASA 4 or higher.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute, Egypt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Suzan Ahmed, MS degree

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NCIEGYPT

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Suzan Ahmed, MSc

Role: CONTACT

00201004610287

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Harkouk H, Fletcher D, Martinez V. Paravertebral block for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain after breast cancer surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Mar;46(3):251-257. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102040. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33414157 (View on PubMed)

Yuksel SS, Chappell AG, Jackson BT, Wescott AB, Ellis MF. "Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Prevention Modalities". JPRAS Open. 2021 Oct 30;31:32-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.10.009. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34926777 (View on PubMed)

Waltho D, Rockwell G. Post-breast surgery pain syndrome: establishing a consensus for the definition of post-mastectomy pain syndrome to provide a standardized clinical and research approach - a review of the literature and discussion. Can J Surg. 2016 Sep;59(5):342-50. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000716.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27668333 (View on PubMed)

Gong Y, Tan Q, Qin Q, Wei C. Prevalence of postmastectomy pain syndrome and associated risk factors: A large single-institution cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e19834. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019834.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32443289 (View on PubMed)

Xin L, Hou N, Zhang Z, Feng Y. The Effect of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. Pain Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):93-106. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00339-9. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34826113 (View on PubMed)

Zinboonyahgoon N, Patton ME, Chen YK, Edwards RR, Schreiber KL. Persistent Post-Mastectomy Pain: The Impact of Regional Anesthesia Among Patients with High vs Low Baseline Catastrophizing. Pain Med. 2021 Aug 6;22(8):1767-1775. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33560352 (View on PubMed)

Batra RK, Krishnan K, Agarwal A. Paravertebral block. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;27(1):5-11. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21804697 (View on PubMed)

Bonvicini D, Boscolo-Berto R, De Cassai A, Negrello M, Macchi V, Tiberio I, Boscolo A, De Caro R, Porzionato A. Anatomical basis of erector spinae plane block: a dissection and histotopographic pilot study. J Anesth. 2021 Feb;35(1):102-111. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02881-w. Epub 2020 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33340344 (View on PubMed)

El Ghamry MR, Amer AF. Role of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in pain control after modified radical mastectomy. A prospective randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;63(12):1008-1014. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_310_19. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31879425 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://aimj.journals.ekb.eg/article_230793.html

Comparative study between ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy.AIMJ.2022.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AP2303-301-0007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03947463 COMPLETED NA