Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Common Femoral Artery Exposure
NCT ID: NCT03935659
Last Updated: 2021-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-26
2021-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Negative Pressure Incision Management System in Infrainguinal Vascular Surgery
NCT03395613
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Reduce Surgical Site Infection
NCT01905397
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Care Dressing
NCT03566641
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Traumatic Skin Loss
NCT05653297
RCT on NPWT for Incisions Following Major Lower-limb Amputation to Reduce Surgical Site Infection
NCT03144726
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* 1 The control group receive a standard sterile gauge dressing over the groin incision. The dressing is removed on post-operative day #2 and the wound is inspected for a SSI or dehiscence, followed by daily dressing changes and wound inspections until discharge.
* 2 The intervention group will receive a NPWT dressing which will be applied in the operating room under sterile conditions. The NPWT dressing will be removed on Post operative day 5. The wound is inspected for a SSI or dehiscence, followed by daily dressing changes and wound inspections until discharge.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard gauze therapy
The control group will receive a standard sterile gauge dressing over the groin incision. The dressing will be removed on post-operative day #2 and the wound will be inspected for any complications, followed by daily dressing changes and wound inspections until discharge.
Standard Wound Care
Standard sterile gauze coverage of the primarily closed groin wound.
Negative Pressure wound therapy
The intervention group will receive a negative pressure dressing which will be applied in the operating room under sterile conditions. The brand of negative pressure dressing will be based on surgeon preference or center availability. The NPWT dressing will be removed on day 5 postoperatively or at discharge, whichever occurs first, and the groin wound inspected for any evidence of infection or dehiscence, and daily thereafter until discharge.
Negative Pressure Pressure Wound Therapy
Investigators will be using a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Powered Suction Pump on primarily closed groin wounds after open common femoral artery exposure, The Negative pressure dressing will be applied in a sterile fashion in the operating room. The negative pressure dressing will be removed at day 5 postoperatively, or at discharge, whichever occurs first.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Negative Pressure Pressure Wound Therapy
Investigators will be using a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Powered Suction Pump on primarily closed groin wounds after open common femoral artery exposure, The Negative pressure dressing will be applied in a sterile fashion in the operating room. The negative pressure dressing will be removed at day 5 postoperatively, or at discharge, whichever occurs first.
Standard Wound Care
Standard sterile gauze coverage of the primarily closed groin wound.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Critical limb ischemia defined by Ankle Brachial Index\<0.35, rest pain, tissue loss and/or non-healing ulcers
* Procedure time \>240 min
* End Stage Renal Disease on dialysis
* Glycated hemoglobin ≥ 8.5%
* Transfusion ≥ 3 units packed Red Blood Cells
* Previous femoral artery cut-down
Exclusion Criteria
* Complete vacuum seal cannot be achieved with negative pressure device
* Allergy to Adhesive Material
* Groin Surgery within last 30 days
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Henry Ford Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
loay kabbani, MD
Principle Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Loay Kabbani, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Henry Ford Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cassini A, Plachouras D, Eckmanns T, Abu Sin M, Blank HP, Ducomble T, Haller S, Harder T, Klingeberg A, Sixtensson M, Velasco E, Weiss B, Kramarz P, Monnet DL, Kretzschmar ME, Suetens C. Burden of Six Healthcare-Associated Infections on European Population Health: Estimating Incidence-Based Disability-Adjusted Life Years through a Population Prevalence-Based Modelling Study. PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002150. eCollection 2016 Oct.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96.
Davis FM, Sutzko DC, Grey SF, Mansour MA, Jain KM, Nypaver TJ, Gaborek G, Henke PK. Predictors of surgical site infection after open lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1769-1778.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.053.
Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H; BASIL trial participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.
Kalish JA, Farber A, Homa K, Trinidad M, Beck A, Davies MG, Kraiss LW, Cronenwett JL; Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization Arterial Quality Committee. Factors associated with surgical site infection after lower extremity bypass in the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;60(5):1238-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Wiseman JT, Guzman AM, Fernandes-Taylor S, Engelbert TL, Saunders RS, Kent KC. General and vascular surgery readmissions: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):552-69.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 22. No abstract available.
Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Mell MW. Predictors of surgical site infection after open lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
Lee K, Murphy PB, Ingves MV, Duncan A, DeRose G, Dubois L, Forbes TL, Power A. Randomized clinical trial of negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk groin wounds in lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1814-1819. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.084. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Coomer NM, Kandilov AM. Impact of hospital-acquired conditions on financial liabilities for Medicare patients. Am J Infect Control. 2016 Nov 1;44(11):1326-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 May 9.
Conte MS, Bandyk DF, Clowes AW, Moneta GL, Seely L, Lorenz TJ, Namini H, Hamdan AD, Roddy SP, Belkin M, Berceli SA, DeMasi RJ, Samson RH, Berman SS; PREVENT III Investigators. Results of PREVENT III: a multicenter, randomized trial of edifoligide for the prevention of vein graft failure in lower extremity bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Apr;43(4):742-751; discussion 751. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.058.
Wiseman JT, Fernandes-Taylor S, Barnes ML, Saunders RS, Saha S, Havlena J, Rathouz PJ, Kent KC. Predictors of surgical site infection after hospital discharge in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;62(4):1023-1031.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.453. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
Leekha S, Lahr BD, Thompson RL, Sampathkumar P, Duncan AA, Orenstein R. Preoperative risk prediction of surgical site infection requiring hospitalization or reoperation in patients undergoing vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.029. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
Virkkunen J, Heikkinen M, Lepantalo M, Metsanoja R, Salenius JP; Finnvasc Study Group. Diabetes as an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications in critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Oct;40(4):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.040.
Tan TW, Farber A, Hamburg NM, Eberhardt RT, Rybin D, Doros G, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Goodney PP, Cronenwett JL, Kalish JA; Vascular Study Group of New England. Blood transfusion for lower extremity bypass is associated with increased wound infection and graft thrombosis. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):1005-1014.e2; quiz 1031-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
Semsarzadeh NN, Tadisina KK, Maddox J, Chopra K, Singh DP. Closed Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Is Associated with Decreased Surgical-Site Infections: A Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Sep;136(3):592-602. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001519.
Matatov T, Reddy KN, Doucet LD, Zhao CX, Zhang WW. Experience with a new negative pressure incision management system in prevention of groin wound infection in vascular surgery patients. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):791-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.037. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
Kwon J, Staley C, McCullough M, Goss S, Arosemena M, Abai B, Salvatore D, Reiter D, DiMuzio P. A randomized clinical trial evaluating negative pressure therapy to decrease vascular groin incision complications. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1744-1752. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.224. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Szilagyi DE, Smith RF, Elliott JP, Vrandecic MP. Infection in arterial reconstruction with synthetic grafts. Ann Surg. 1972 Sep;176(3):321-33. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197209000-00008. No abstract available.
Correia RM, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Cristino MA, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in peripheral arterial reconstruction of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 29;10:CD015022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015022.pub2.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
CDC Criteria for Surgical Site Infection
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11956
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.