Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Care Dressing

NCT ID: NCT03566641

Last Updated: 2024-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-28

Study Completion Date

2019-04-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A comparison between the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy and the efficacy of standard care dressing

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (Prevena) and standard clinical dressing in terms of prevention of postoperative surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, and total cost of hospitalization among vascular, plastic and general surgery patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Comparing the rate of occurrence of surgical site infection, total hospital cost and length of stay between two groups: group 1 represents patients who receive Prevena for postoperative wound care and group 2 represents patients who receive standard care dressing for the same purpose.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Out study is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. The patient will be informed about the type of dressing used for their wound care, but the investigator and the outcome assessor will be blinded for which type of dressing used for each participant patient.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Negative pressure wound therapy

This group of patients will receive negative pressure wound therapy (prevena) as their postoperative wound care method.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Negative pressure wound therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

The application of a vacuum across the surface of a wound through a foam dressing cut to fit the wound.

standard care dressing

This group of patients will receive standard care dressing as their postoperative wound care method.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standard care dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

The application of a standard care dressing (instead of negative pressure wound therapy) across the surface of wound.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Negative pressure wound therapy

The application of a vacuum across the surface of a wound through a foam dressing cut to fit the wound.

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard care dressing

The application of a standard care dressing (instead of negative pressure wound therapy) across the surface of wound.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Prevena dray gauze

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consent for participation from the patient or his legal representative

Exclusion Criteria

* Currently infected wounds
* Patients with history of immunosupression
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Toledo Health Science Campus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Munier Nazzal, M.S. M.D

Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

munier nazzal, md

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UTMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UTMC

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Prevena V. 11/14/17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Negative Wound Pressure on P.S
NCT06243328 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA