The Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Healing in Major Amputations of the Lower Limb

NCT ID: NCT04618406

Last Updated: 2025-03-18

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 160 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2021-11-01
• Study Completion Date: 2025-07-31

Brief Summary

The socioeconomic costs of problematic and delayed wound healing following lower limb amputations are enormous to the society. Lower limb amputations is one of the longest known surgical treatments, but also one of the least investigated in the field of medical science. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has emerged as a great instrument to aid healing. Studies have shown that it has a positive and measurable effect on wound healing following eg. total Knee and hip replacements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a closed NPWT on incidence of postoperative wound complications, in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation.

Detailed Description

Historically lower limb amputations have been performed to treat infection or trauma, usually in the setting of war. Today however major amputations of the lower extremities (transfemoral- (TFA), knee disarticulations (KD) and transtibial amputations (TTA)) are, in developed countries, usually performed in elderly patients with untreatable vascular disease, diabetes or a combination of both. This fragile group of patients are characterized by a high degree of comorbidity, mortality and both surgical and postoperative complications; included herein problems with wound healing. The tissue is typically poorly vascularized and prone to wound break-down, infections, necrosis etc. 10-40% of patients undergoing TFA, KD or TTA have delayed wound healing and/or insufficient wound healing, resulting in problems with the aftercare, mobilization with a prosthesis and re-amputations. Recent retrospective studies show that Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) may have beneficial effects on incisional healing following lower limb amputations. However to our knowledge it has never been reproduced in a prospective randomized controlled setting.The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of NPWT with a PICO®️ device (Smith & Nephew) on the healing of the surgical wound following TFA, KD and TTA.

Conditions

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Amputation; Wound Heal

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

PICO VAC

PICO14 device from Smith and Nephew. It is a Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device that provides an effective negative pressure of -80 mmHg for 14 days. It is an easily applied all-in-one system that ensures uniform application each time it is applied. The dressing consists of 4 distinct layers that reduce the risk of skin trauma, applies equal negative pressure to the skin and manages fluid transport away from the wound through a combination of absorption and evaporation through an airlock layer. The device is approved for the treatment of open wounds, closed surgical incisions and skin grafts. Both PICO-VAC and soft dressing are applied immediately postoperatively and removed after 12 days.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

PICO VAC

Intervention Type: DEVICE

PICO14 device from Smith and Nephew - Off the shelf, disposable negative pressure wound therapy device. Contains sterile dressing as well as an attached small (pager-sized) suction device/canister and provides a negative pressure of -80 mmHg for 14 days.

Standard care

Standard care (sterile surgical silicone foam dressing and soft dressing)

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard care

Intervention Type: OTHER

Sterile surgical silicone foam dressing and soft dressing applied immediately postoperative and removed after 12 days

Interventions

PICO VAC

PICO14 device from Smith and Nephew - Off the shelf, disposable negative pressure wound therapy device. Contains sterile dressing as well as an attached small (pager-sized) suction device/canister and provides a negative pressure of -80 mmHg for 14 days.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Standard care

Sterile surgical silicone foam dressing and soft dressing applied immediately postoperative and removed after 12 days

Intervention Type: OTHER

Other Intervention Names

PICO VAC (Smith and Nephew); Sterile surgical silicone foam dressing and soft dressing

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients undergoing transfemoral, knee disarticulations and transtibial amputations by non-traumatic indication
• Uni or bilateral amputations or re-amputations

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients undergoing traumatic amputations
• Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
• Inability to comply with planned study procedures
• Amputations due to malignancy

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Lars Grau Lykkeberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Sonderjylland

Locations

Sygehus Soenderjylland

Aabenraa, , Denmark

Countries

Denmark

References

Belmont PJ Jr, Davey S, Orr JD, Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Schoenfeld AJ. Risk factors for 30-day postoperative complications and mortality after below-knee amputation: a study of 2,911 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Sep;213(3):370-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21723151 (View on PubMed)

Hasanadka R, McLafferty RB, Moore CJ, Hood DB, Ramsey DE, Hodgson KJ. Predictors of wound complications following major amputation for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.048. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21840153 (View on PubMed)

Kotha V, Walter E, Stimac G, Kim P. Incisional Application of Negative Pressure for Nontraumatic Lower Extremity Amputations: A Review. Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:49-55.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30472722 (View on PubMed)

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJ. Negative pressure wound therapy via vacuum-assisted closure following partial foot amputation: what is the role of wound chronicity? Int Wound J. 2007 Mar;4(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00270.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17425550 (View on PubMed)

Sepulveda G, Espindola M, Maureira M, Sepulveda E, Ignacio Fernandez J, Oliva C, Sanhueza A, Vial M, Manterola C. [Negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard wound dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot amputation. A randomised controlled trial]. Cir Esp. 2009 Sep;86(3):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 Jul 18. Spanish.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19616774 (View on PubMed)

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA; Diabetic Foot Study Consortium. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Nov 12;366(9498):1704-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67695-7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16291063 (View on PubMed)

Liu X, Zhang H, Cen S, Huang F. Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound dressings in treatment of open fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.064. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29555530 (View on PubMed)

Norman G, Goh EL, Dumville JC, Shi C, Liu Z, Chiverton L, Stankiewicz M, Reid A. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 1;5(5):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 32356396 (View on PubMed)

Karlakki S, Brem M, Giannini S, Khanduja V, Stannard J, Martin R. Negative pressure wound therapy for managementof the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery: A review of evidence and mechanisms for an emerging indication. Bone Joint Res. 2013 Dec 18;2(12):276-84. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.212.2000190. Print 2013.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24352756 (View on PubMed)

Karlakki SL, Hamad AK, Whittall C, Graham NM, Banerjee RD, Kuiper JH. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res. 2016 Aug;5(8):328-37. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.58.BJR-2016-0022.R1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27496913 (View on PubMed)

Nherera LM, Trueman P, Karlakki SL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) in routine primary hip and knee replacements. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 May;25(3):474-482. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12530. Epub 2017 May 3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28370637 (View on PubMed)

Fisher DF Jr, Clagett GP, Fry RE, Humble TH, Fry WJ. One-stage versus two-stage amputation for wet gangrene of the lower extremity: a randomized study. J Vasc Surg. 1988 Oct;8(4):428-33.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 3172378 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

SHS-KI-09-2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id