Treatment Study of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Diabetic Foot Wounds
NCT ID: NCT01480362
Last Updated: 2020-05-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
360 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This german multicenter study is due to evaluate whether the negative pressure wound therapy or the control therapy (standard wound therapy following the guidelines) is superior.
Patients will be randomly assigned to the two study arms. Both patients and the treatment staff know about the specific allocation to the negative pressure wound therapy or standard wound therapy arm.
A photo documentation and a computer-based evaluation of the wound images will be performed. This is done centrally by independent examiners, who don't know neither the patient nor the treatment assignment.
It is believed that the application of the negative pressure wound therapy systems compared to standard therapy of diabetic foot wounds will lead more frequent and more rapid to the achievement of complete wound closure and that the use of negative pressure wound therapy is an effective and safe therapy option for the treatment of diabetic foot wounds in inpatient and outpatient care.
Patient´s to be included into the study should have either a chronic diabetic foot wound existing longer than 4 weeks whereas dead tissue components must be completely removed by the doctor or a wound after amputation of foot parts.
The study treatment may have already started in the hospital if applicable. The further wound treatment will be mainly performed within outpatient care. Study Participants will return to the study centre for regular study visits or even for wound treatment.
The comparison of the outcomes of both study arms will give valuable information about the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in inpatient as well as outpatient care. These results should be provided until the end of 2016 as a basis for the decision of the Federal Joint Committee to answer the question if the negative pressure wound therapy can be approved as a standard service for reimbursement by health insurance companies.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Treatment of DFUs Incl. Post Amputation Wounds.
NCT01011387
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT04093635
Diabetes Related Foot Ulcers with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
NCT06721754
Study to Evaluate the PICO 14 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System in the Management of Acute and Chronic Wounds
NCT05234632
A Study Comparing V.A.C. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to Moist Wound Therapy (MWT) in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Amputation Wounds
NCT00837096
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
On behalf of a consortium of 19 health insurance companies with a central contact consisting of the "AOK-Bundesverband GbR", "Verband der Ersatzkassen e.V." (vdek) and the "Knappschaft" these contractors are responsible for conducting the trial.
The Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM) as part of the University of Witten / Herdecke gGmbH is responsible for the planning, implementation, analysis and publication of the study.
The Private University of Witten / Herdecke takes over the sponsorship of the study project. The duties and responsibilities of the sponsor are transferred to the staff of the Institute for Research in Operative Medicine of University of Witten / Herdecke. The financial support of the clinical study is provided by the manufacturers of the negative pressure wound therapy systems. The task of payment processing and the contractual provisions is taken over by a management company "Gesundheitsforen Leipzig".
Therapy systems used within the treatment arm of the study will be provided by two manufacturers Kinetic Concepts Incorporated (KCI) and Smith \& Nephew Inc. All used treatment systems bear the CE mark and will be used within normal conditions of clinical routine and according to manufacturer's instructions.
This research project is performed because of a decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany, which states that negative pressure wound therapy can´t be accepted as a standard therapy with full reimbursement by the health insurance companies in Germany. This decision is based on the rapid report and the final report of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, which showed through systematic reviews and meta-analysis of previous study projects that an insufficient state evidence regarding the use of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds is existing.
This study evaluates the treatment outcome of the application of a technical medical device, which is based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy (treatment group 1: Intervention Group) in comparison to standard wound therapy (treatment group 2: Control group) in the treatment of chronic foot wounds after adequate (debridement of avital tissue) wound preparation or amputation wounds resulting from a scheduled amputation below the ankle (talocrural articulation), which are caused in the context of a diabetic foot syndrome.
The clinical trial is designed as a national, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled superiority study. A blinded evaluation of wound photographs will be performed.
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the treatment arm: negative pressure wound therapy and the control arm: standard wound therapy.
Patients will be stratified according to assignment to the participating institution (hospital) and by Wagner-Armstrong Stadium.
The inclusion and exclusion criteria are based on the presence of a diagnosis of a diabetic foot wound, the regulatory requirements to the participants in a clinical study and the examination and treatment according to current treatment regulations, evidence-based guidelines and the specifications of the manufacturers of the medical devices.
Only patients meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criterion are allowed to be included into the trial.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, safety and economic results of both treatment arms.
The primary endpoints to evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic foot wounds caused by a diabetic foot syndrome are both the number of complete wound closure within the maximum treatment period (measured in days) as well as the time until complete wound closure. Complete wound closure should be achieved within the maximum study treatment period of 16 weeks.
In addition, secondary clinical endpoints and safety endpoints, patient-reported outcome endpoints and health economic endpoints are evaluated.
The clinical examination includes parameters that can be used for the analysis of resource use in the inpatient and outpatient care. This includes a comparative analysis of parameters of direct and indirect resource use.
Primarily the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance is considered. As a secondary perspective the view of society was selected.
Sample size calculation was performed considering results of existing trials, which revealed that a number n = 324 patients must be included in the study in order to carry out the analysis of the primary endpoint "Closure rate".
In due consideration of screening failures, discontinuation of therapy of any cause and losses to Follow-Up a screening of a total of 464 patients must be performed to provide the calculated sample size.The primary efficacy analysis is performed using the intention-to-treat group.
Study results will be provided until the end of 2015 to contribute to the final decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany regarding the general admission of negative pressure wound therapy as a standard of performance within both medical sectors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
The therapy involves the controlled application of sub-atmospheric pressure to the local wound environment,using a sealed wound dressing connected to a vacuum pump.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Used therapy systems:
KCI. V.A.C. Freedom; Acti V.A.C.; INFO V.A.C. to be used with the V.A.C. Granufoam (black), V.A.C. Granufoam Silver and V.A.C. WhiteFoam Smith \& Nephew: Renasys GO and Renasys EZ Plus to be used with the Renassys-F/P and Renassys-G Use of the medical devices and applicable consumption items according to manufacturers guidelines and FDA regulations.
Standard Wound Therapy
Standard wound therapy according to current evidence-based guideline(basic and advanced methods of wound treatment)
Standard Wound Therapy
Standard wound therapy according to current evidence-based guideline(basic and advanced methods of wound treatment)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Used therapy systems:
KCI. V.A.C. Freedom; Acti V.A.C.; INFO V.A.C. to be used with the V.A.C. Granufoam (black), V.A.C. Granufoam Silver and V.A.C. WhiteFoam Smith \& Nephew: Renasys GO and Renasys EZ Plus to be used with the Renassys-F/P and Renassys-G Use of the medical devices and applicable consumption items according to manufacturers guidelines and FDA regulations.
Standard Wound Therapy
Standard wound therapy according to current evidence-based guideline(basic and advanced methods of wound treatment)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of a foot wound (chronic wounds; amputation wounds) Wagner stage 2-4
* Existence of the foot wound for at least 4 weeks
* Signed informed consent form
* Patient's eligibility of NPWT in the opinion of the treating physician
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-Compliance
* Pregnancy
* Allergies regarding the release of substances from components of each treatment arm
* Severe anemia, wich was not caused by an infection
* Simultaneous participation of patients in another interventional study / previous participation in the same study
* Use of NPWT systems to the study-related foot lesion within a period of 6 weeks prior to study inclusion
* Presence of necrotic tissue with eschar, which can not be removed
* Untreated osteitis or osteomyelitis
* Not examined / unexplored fistula
* Malignancy of the wound
* Exposed: nerves, blood vessels, anastomotic site
* ambulant NPWT of patients receiving anticoagulants (especially heparinization or marcumar therapy) or with otherwise highly impaired clotting function, which have a risk of circulatory relevant bleeding
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Smith & Nephew Wound Management Inc
INDUSTRY
University of Witten/Herdecke
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Doerthe Seidel
Head of division for clinical research at the Institute for Research in Operative Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dörthe Seidel
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Witten Herdecke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Diabetes Klinik GmbH & Co KG
Bad Mergentheim, , Germany
Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Königin Elisabeth Herzberge gGmbH
Berlin, , Germany
Franziskus-Krankenhaus Berlin, Abteilung für Innere Medizin
Berlin, , Germany
Klinikum Bielefeld, Klinik für Allgemeine und Innere Medizin
Bielefeld, , Germany
Gerhard Rothenaicher, Facharzt für Chirurgie, München Bogenhausen
Bogenhausen, , Germany
Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie
Bottrop, , Germany
Tagesklinik Buchloe
Buchloe, , Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Schlotmann - Hochlenert - Zavaleta - Haberstock
Cologne, , Germany
Chirurgische Praxisgemeinschaft am Bayenthalgürtel, Praxis Dr. med. Gerald Engels
Cologne, , Germany
Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie
Cologne, , Germany
Klinikum Darmstadt, Gefäß- und Endovascularchirurgie
Darmstadt, , Germany
Marienhospital Dortmund-Hombruch, Klinik für Innere Medizin / Diabetologie
Dortmund, , Germany
Klinikum Döbeln
Döbeln, , Germany
Diabetische Schwerpunktpraxis
Duisburg, , Germany
Malteser Krankenhaus - St. Franziskus-Hospital, Medizinische Klinik I, Abt. f. Diabetologie
Flensburg, , Germany
Bürgerhospital, Klinik für Diabetologie und Ernährungsmedizin
Frankfurt, , Germany
Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder), Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie
Frankfurt (Oder), , Germany
Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Klinik für Gefäß- und Endovascularchirurgie
Frankfurt am Main, , Germany
Weißeritztal-Kliniken GmbH Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie-, vaskuläre und endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Phlebologie
Freital, , Germany
Helfenstein Klinik Geislingen, Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie
Geislingen, , Germany
Asklepios Kliniken Harburg
Hamburg, , Germany
ASKLEPIOS Westklinikum Hamburg GmbH
Hamburg, , Germany
Paracelsusklinik am Silbersee, Wundzentrum Hannover
Hannover-Langenhagen, , Germany
Westküstenklinikum Heide, Klinik für Visceral- und Gefäßchirurgie
Heide, , Germany
Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe GmbH
Karlsruhe, , Germany
Alexianer Krankenhaus Krefeld GmbH, Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral- und Thoraxchirurgie
Krefeld, , Germany
St. Remigius Krankenhaus Opladen
Leverkusen, , Germany
Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, vaskuläre und endovaskuläre Chirurgie
Ludwigsburg, , Germany
Diabetologikum Ludwigshafen, Diabetes-Schwerpunktpraxis
Ludwigshafen, , Germany
Uniklinik Lübeck, Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie
Lübeck, , Germany
Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH
Mönchengladbach, , Germany
Städt. Klinikum Bogenhausen
München, , Germany
Institut für Diabetesforschung Münster GmbH
Münster, , Germany
Städtisches Klinikum Neunkirchen gGmbH
Neunkirchen, , Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Drs. Alter, Heim, Pourhassan
Oberhausen, , Germany
Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie
Offenburg, , Germany
Klinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben Quedlinburg GmbH, Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral- und Gefäßchirurgie
Quedlinburg, , Germany
Hegau-Bodensee Klinikum Radolfzell (HBK), Klinik für Innere Medizin
Radolfzell, , Germany
Thüringen Kliniken "Georgius Agricola", Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie
Saalfeld, , Germany
St. Marienkrankenhaus Siegen gGmbH, Klinik für Gastroenterologie
Siegen, , Germany
Mariannen-Hospital Werl, Abteilung für Chirurgie
Werl, , Germany
HSK - Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken GmbH
Wiesbaden, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Seidel D, Mathes T, Lefering R, Storck M, Lawall H, Neugebauer EA. Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard wound care in chronic diabetic foot wounds: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Aug 27;15:334. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-334.
Seidel D, Storck M, Lawall H, Wozniak G, Mauckner P, Hochlenert D, Wetzel-Roth W, Sondern K, Hahn M, Rothenaicher G, Kronert T, Zink K, Neugebauer E. Negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard moist wound care on diabetic foot ulcers in real-life clinical practice: results of the German DiaFu-RCT. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 24;10(3):e026345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026345.
Seidel D, Lefering R; DiaFu study group. NPWT resource use compared with standard moist wound care in diabetic foot wounds: DiaFu randomized clinical trial results. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Sep 30;15(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00569-w.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DRKS00003347
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UWT_1_GKV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.