Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2005-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Registry
NCT02813161
Cellular and Tissue Based Therapy Registry
NCT02322554
SNaP Wound Care System Versus Traditional NPWT Device for Treatment of Chronic Wounds
NCT00951080
Venous Leg Ulcer and Lymphedema Registry
NCT02813187
A Prospective, Open, Non-controlled Clinical Investigation to Evaluate a New Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) System to be Used in the Treatment of Acute Non-infected Wounds and Post Surgical Infected Wounds
NCT01195896
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
NPWT promotes wound healing by applying a vacuum through a special sealed dressing. The mechanical micro-deformation of the wound bed in response to suction has been shown to stimulate and accelerate the formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis). The continuous vacuum removes fluid and reduces edema, thereby increasing tissue oxygen levels. The vacuum may be applied continuously or intermittently, depending on the type of wound being treated and the clinical objectives. Depending on the NPWT device, a variety of dressings are placed into the wound bed in conjunction with NPWT, and a variety of suction pressures may be applied.
The diversity of NPWT devices and the rate at which they are becoming available for clinical use make it impossible to perform randomized controlled trials to compare their effectiveness against one another. Effectiveness in real world patients is the best current option to understand the role of NPWT in wound healing.
Hospital based outpatient wound centers participating in the US Wound Registry agree to provide data as part of quality initiatives including participation in PQRS, and to meet their Stage 2 Meaningful use criteria. The NPWTR is a subset of the USWR (Chronic Disease Registry) data. All patient data from all participating outpatient clinics are transmitted to the USWR where data are available for benchmarking, PQRS and other initiatives. Data used for comparative effectiveness research is HIPAA de-identified.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NPWT treated wounds
NPWT from any FDA cleared NPWT device including
NPWT
SVAP polyurethane foam, RENASYS foam, RENASYS gauze, AMD gauze, VAC white sponge, VAC black sponge, applied with various NPWT devices, in addition to various dressings to protect wound edges
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NPWT
SVAP polyurethane foam, RENASYS foam, RENASYS gauze, AMD gauze, VAC white sponge, VAC black sponge, applied with various NPWT devices, in addition to various dressings to protect wound edges
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
U.S. Wound Registry
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Caroline Fife, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
US Wound Registry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Luke's Wound Care Clinic
The Woodlands, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B, Otto G. The safety of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure in diabetic foot ulcers treated in the outpatient setting. Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00467.x.
Fife CE, Carter MJ. Wound Care Outcomes and Associated Cost Among Patients Treated in US Outpatient Wound Centers: Data From the US Wound Registry. Wounds. 2012 Jan;24(1):10-7.
Fife CE, Otto G, Walker D, Turner T, Smith L. Healing dehisced surgical wounds with negative pressure wound therapy. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004 Apr;50(4A Suppl):28-31. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDR003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.