Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
300000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2005-01-01
2030-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Registry
NCT02813161
Venous Leg Ulcer and Lymphedema Registry
NCT02813187
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Registry
NCT02467998
Cellular and Tissue Based Therapy Registry
NCT02322554
Real-World Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane Allografts Versus Standard Wound Care in DFU, VLU, and PU
NCT07223281
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All major wound types are represented: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), diabetic ulcers not on the foot, Venous leg ulcers (VLUs), Arterial ulcers, Pressure ulcers/injuries, Surgical complications, Traumatic wounds, Vasculitic/inflammatory, and sickle cell-related ulcers, and chronic non-pressure ulcers.
The registry collects detailed data on standard-of-care practices and advanced wound care interventions, including brand-specific information on: Advanced dressings (e.g., collagen, antimicrobial), Compression therapy, Offloading devices, Cellular and/or tissue-based products (CTPs) also called Cellular, Acellular, or Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) or "skin substitutes," Negative pressure wound therapy, MIST therapy (low-frequency ultrasound), Topical oxygen therapy (TOT), Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT), Topical growth factors (e.g., Becaplermin), Enzymatic and mechanical debridement, Fluorescent imaging for bacterial load, Topical antibiotics and antimicrobials, and other treatments.
The registry captures key elements of the patient journey, including: Frequency of debridement, Sites of care, number of patient visits and number of wound visits, Dressing changes, Use and timing of advanced therapies, Comorbid disease burden and clinical complexity, Patient Frailty, number of wounds and ulcers per patient, patient time in service, wound time service, patient and wound outcomes, the development of new wounds while in service and complication rates.
Wounds are risk stratified using the Wound Healing Index, enabling case-mix adjustment and longitudinal outcome tracking. Follow-up may extend over five years, capturing outcomes such as: Complete healing (epithelialization), Non-healing, Major and minor amputations, Mortality, and Loss to follow-up or transfer of care. Quality of care is assessed using wound-specific quality measures. The registry integrates real-world clinical care with research and quality improvement, supporting a learning healthcare system model.
Through secure tokenization, registry data may be linked to payer claims for comprehensive longitudinal analysis of healthcare utilization, interventions, hospitalizations, medication use, and long-term outcomes across care settings. This enables rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations of standard care and advanced wound therapies in routine practice. The robust patient and wound level data are suitable to understand the natural history of chronic wounds and ulcers and to create historical controls for prospective clinical trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
chronic wound patients
This cohort includes pediatric and adult patients with one or more chronic wounds or ulcers treated in any site of care including hospital outpatient clinics, office-based practices, skilled nursing, and home. Data are captured prospectively during routine care using a purpose built certified EHR. Wounds include diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers/injuries, arterial ulcers, surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, and inflammatory ulcers. Interventions are at the discretion of the treating clinician and include standard and advanced wound therapies. Data collected include patient demographics, comorbid conditions, medications, total number of concomitant wounds per patient, wound characteristics, treatments, visit frequency, complications, and outcomes including healing, amputation, recurrence, hospitalization, and death. Patients may be followed for over five years.
Usual care
advanced dressings, off-loading, venous ulcer compression, arterial screening
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Usual care
advanced dressings, off-loading, venous ulcer compression, arterial screening
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Wound or ulcer must be treated at a participating site (which can be a hospital outpatient department, office, mobile practitioner, in the home setting, skilled nursing, etc.)
* Care must be documented using the purpose-built, wound-specific structured electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system
* All ages, including infants and patients aged 90 years or older (reported in aggregate in accordance with HIPAA de-identification standards)
* All sexes and gender identities
* All wound types and severities, including multiple wounds per patient
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
U.S. Wound Registry
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Caroline E Fife, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Intellicure LLC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
US Wound Registry
The Woodlands, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B, Otto G. The safety of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure in diabetic foot ulcers treated in the outpatient setting. Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00467.x.
Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Electronic Health Records, Registries, and Quality Measures: What? Why? How? Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Dec;2(10):598-604. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0476.
Horn SD, Fife CE, Smout RJ, Barrett RS, Thomson B. Development of a wound healing index for patients with chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):823-32. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12107. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
Carter MJ, Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Jul;22(7):316-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305486.06358.e0.
Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D, Thomson B. A retrospective data analysis of antimicrobial dressing usage in 3,084 patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Mar 1;56(3):28-42.
Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D. Why is it so hard to do the right thing in wound care? Wound Repair Regen. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):154-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00571.x. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
US Wound Registry Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
USWR 001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.