A Real-World Registry of Chronic Wounds and Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT02280733

Last Updated: 2025-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-01

Study Completion Date

2030-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world, observational registry designed to capture the full clinical course and patient journey associated with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data are collected during routine care from over 1,400 clinicians across the USA and Puerto Rico using a highly structured certified electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system. Data are transmitted daily to the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR), a CMS-recognized Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR). The registry captures real-time, research-ready data on patient demographics, comorbidities, wound characteristics, standard-of-care treatments, complications, and advanced therapeutics. It supports robust, fit-for-purpose real-world evidence generation by enabling risk-adjusted outcome analysis, comparative effectiveness research, and quality improvement across diverse sites of care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world observational registry focused on the chronic disease burden and patient journey of individuals with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data collection began in 2005 and continues prospectively, capturing structured clinical data at the point of care using a purpose-built certified EHR or EDC system. These data are securely transmitted to the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR), a CMS-designated Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR).

All major wound types are represented: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), diabetic ulcers not on the foot, Venous leg ulcers (VLUs), Arterial ulcers, Pressure ulcers/injuries, Surgical complications, Traumatic wounds, Vasculitic/inflammatory, and sickle cell-related ulcers, and chronic non-pressure ulcers.

The registry collects detailed data on standard-of-care practices and advanced wound care interventions, including brand-specific information on: Advanced dressings (e.g., collagen, antimicrobial), Compression therapy, Offloading devices, Cellular and/or tissue-based products (CTPs) also called Cellular, Acellular, or Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) or "skin substitutes," Negative pressure wound therapy, MIST therapy (low-frequency ultrasound), Topical oxygen therapy (TOT), Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT), Topical growth factors (e.g., Becaplermin), Enzymatic and mechanical debridement, Fluorescent imaging for bacterial load, Topical antibiotics and antimicrobials, and other treatments.

The registry captures key elements of the patient journey, including: Frequency of debridement, Sites of care, number of patient visits and number of wound visits, Dressing changes, Use and timing of advanced therapies, Comorbid disease burden and clinical complexity, Patient Frailty, number of wounds and ulcers per patient, patient time in service, wound time service, patient and wound outcomes, the development of new wounds while in service and complication rates.

Wounds are risk stratified using the Wound Healing Index, enabling case-mix adjustment and longitudinal outcome tracking. Follow-up may extend over five years, capturing outcomes such as: Complete healing (epithelialization), Non-healing, Major and minor amputations, Mortality, and Loss to follow-up or transfer of care. Quality of care is assessed using wound-specific quality measures. The registry integrates real-world clinical care with research and quality improvement, supporting a learning healthcare system model.

Through secure tokenization, registry data may be linked to payer claims for comprehensive longitudinal analysis of healthcare utilization, interventions, hospitalizations, medication use, and long-term outcomes across care settings. This enables rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations of standard care and advanced wound therapies in routine practice. The robust patient and wound level data are suitable to understand the natural history of chronic wounds and ulcers and to create historical controls for prospective clinical trials.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Foot Pressure Ulcer Surgical Wound Dehiscence Vasculitis Skin Ulcer Leg Ulcer Pyoderma Peripheral Arterial Disease Lymphedema Surgical Complication Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) Calciphylaxis Sickle Cell Ulcer Pressure Ulcer (PU) Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) Pressure Injury Arterial Ulcers Soft Tissue Radionecrosis (STRN) Traumatic Wounds Chronic Ulcer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

chronic wound patients

This cohort includes pediatric and adult patients with one or more chronic wounds or ulcers treated in any site of care including hospital outpatient clinics, office-based practices, skilled nursing, and home. Data are captured prospectively during routine care using a purpose built certified EHR. Wounds include diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers/injuries, arterial ulcers, surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, and inflammatory ulcers. Interventions are at the discretion of the treating clinician and include standard and advanced wound therapies. Data collected include patient demographics, comorbid conditions, medications, total number of concomitant wounds per patient, wound characteristics, treatments, visit frequency, complications, and outcomes including healing, amputation, recurrence, hospitalization, and death. Patients may be followed for over five years.

Usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

advanced dressings, off-loading, venous ulcer compression, arterial screening

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Usual care

advanced dressings, off-loading, venous ulcer compression, arterial screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

usual and customary care

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presence of one or more chronic wounds or ulcers of any etiology
* Wound or ulcer must be treated at a participating site (which can be a hospital outpatient department, office, mobile practitioner, in the home setting, skilled nursing, etc.)
* Care must be documented using the purpose-built, wound-specific structured electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system
* All ages, including infants and patients aged 90 years or older (reported in aggregate in accordance with HIPAA de-identification standards)
* All sexes and gender identities
* All wound types and severities, including multiple wounds per patient
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

U.S. Wound Registry

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Caroline E Fife, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Intellicure LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

US Wound Registry

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Caroline E Fife, MD

Role: CONTACT

Ben LeBoutillier, MS

Role: CONTACT

800-603-7896

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Caroline E Fife, MD

Role: primary

800-603-7896

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B, Otto G. The safety of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure in diabetic foot ulcers treated in the outpatient setting. Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00467.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18577134 (View on PubMed)

Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Electronic Health Records, Registries, and Quality Measures: What? Why? How? Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Dec;2(10):598-604. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0476.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24761335 (View on PubMed)

Horn SD, Fife CE, Smout RJ, Barrett RS, Thomson B. Development of a wound healing index for patients with chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):823-32. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12107. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24134202 (View on PubMed)

Carter MJ, Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Jul;22(7):316-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305486.06358.e0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20375969 (View on PubMed)

Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D, Thomson B. A retrospective data analysis of antimicrobial dressing usage in 3,084 patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Mar 1;56(3):28-42.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20368672 (View on PubMed)

Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D. Why is it so hard to do the right thing in wound care? Wound Repair Regen. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):154-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00571.x. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20163568 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.uswoundregistry.com/

US Wound Registry Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

USWR 001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pressure and Diabetic Foot
NCT03213093 RECRUITING NA
The RESPOND Registry
NCT03286452 COMPLETED
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Imaging- Study 2
NCT03942081 RECRUITING NA