Vacuum Assisted Closure Versus On-demand Relaparotomy in Patients With Fecal or Diffuse Peritonitis
NCT ID: NCT03932461
Last Updated: 2023-11-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
340 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-01
2027-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Damage Control Laparotomy
NCT02706041
Transgastric Peritoneoscopy and Appendectomy
NCT00952146
Explanations for Negative Laparoscopic Appendectomies and Normal Laparoscopies
NCT03349814
Pathophysiology of Perioperative Fluid Management in Emergency Laparotomy
NCT03997721
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Plus Peritoneal Lavage for Acute Complicated Appendicitis Patients With Diffuse Peritonitis
NCT06633744
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary endpoint is to compare peritonitis related complications and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) between NPWT treatment (VAC) and conventional treatment (ROD) at 30, 90 days and 1 year.
Secondary outcome parameters are: Mortality at 30, 90 days and 1 year, SOFA score and C-reactive protein measured the first seven days after index laparatomy, quality of life after 3 and 12 months (SF-36 questionnaire), ventral hernia after 3 and 12 months. (assessed by CT) and, hospital care utility within three months after index surgery. A power calculation was made which concluded that 340 patients should be included.
\*Diffuse fecal peritonitis is defined as contamination of 2 out of the 4 abdominal quadrants with fecal contamination starting from the small intestine, colon or rectum.
Design
A multicenter non-blinded superiority randomized controlled trial on VAC vs. ROD. Danish, as well as other European centers, will be invited to participate
All patients over 18 with suspected diffuse peritonitis caused by perforation of the small intestine, colon or rectum with contamination in minimum 2 out of 4 abdominal quadrants, will be included.
Exclusion criteria are;
* Diffuse peritonitis originating from a different focus than the small intestine, colon or rectum
* Diffuse peritonitis originating from a perforation on the stomach, duodenum, gallbladder, appendix, necrotizing pancreatitis, salpingitis, or peritoneal dialysis
* Primary peritonitis
* Immunocompromised (ongoing chemotherapy or prednisolone \>20 mg/day)
* Chronic parenchymal liver disease
* Pregnancy
* Patients with end-stage disease
* Laparoscopic surgery (not converted to laparotomy)
* Acute occlusion of superior mesenteric artery
* Peritoneal carcinomatosis
* Abdominal trauma
* Lack of consent from the surgical equipoise
* Local peritonitis confined to 1 quadrant only
Randomization
Patients are included by a surgical equipoise followed by patient information and consent after recovery. The primary investigator from each site will be contacted by the surgeon on-call when a patient is scheduled for diagnostic laparoscopy or explorative laparotomy on suspicion of secondary peritonitis. Patients' fulling inclusions criteria will be randomized after consent has been obtained by the surgical equipoise. Centers that do not receive approval from their respective scientific ethics committee to include patients through a surgical equipoise must obtain informed and written consent before randomization. Randomization will be web-based via (REDCap ®) in blocks of 2, 4, and 6 stratified for center and age above or below 65 years. The justifications for stratifying according to the center are that there might be differences in the surgical treatment, preoperative optimization, and postoperative treatment both at the ward and intensive care unit (ICU) that might affect the outcome. The patients will be randomized to either abdominal closure with ROD or open abdomen with VAC. The randomization tool, along with eligibility criteria, can be accessed through our website, www.vacor.sdu.dk.
In cases where the surgeon finds that the allocated treatment may be contraindicated or is judged to harm the patient, it will be left to the surgeon's discretion to choose the most appropriate treatment. Patients who cannot be treated according to randomization will be analyzed according to intention-to-treat principles. Any eligible patient not included will be registered in a screening log.
How to apply Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC)
The VAC® Abdominal Dressing System (KCI Vacuum Assisted Closure, San Antonio, TX, USA) will be used. Intestines, including lateral aspects, are covered by the visceral protective layer. The first layer of foam is placed in the laparostoma on the visceral protective layer and must extend below the fascia at a distance of 5 cm from the facial opening. Above this, a minimum of one piece of foam is folded and placed in the laparostoma. Finally, the laparostoma will be covered by the occlusive drape. A circular opening of approximately 5 cm in diameter will be created in the drape where the connection tubes to the vacuum pump will be placed. Simultaneously while applying the negative pressure of 125 mmHg, the wound edges are approximated manually towards the midline. The dressing will be changed with an interval of approximately 48 hours as standard or whenever needed according to the clinical condition. Each dressing change must be performed in the operation theatre with the patient in general anesthesia and muscle relaxation. Peritoneal fluid must be cultured at each dressing change and when fascia is closed. The fascia closure will commence as soon as possible according to the patient's general condition judged by gastrointestinal function, renal function, and a decline in inflammatory parameters either in one or repeated sessions. The aim will be a closure of the abdomen within a maximum of 8 days after the index operation.
The fascia closure after VAC-treatment can be according to the Israelssons principle as described below or upon the surgeon's discretion. A staged closure may start distally, proximally, or in a combination.
How to do primary closure
The abdominal wall is closed according to the Isreaelsson principle where it is sewn continuously in the fascia at a distance between the sutures of 5 mm and the distance to the facade edge of 5-10 mm. Monofilament PDS 0-0 (Ethicon) (or equivalent) is used. The suturing is started cranially and caudally, and the sutures are tied at the end of the continuous thread with self-locking knots. 4 times as much suture material as the length of the wound must be consumed.
The fascia closure after VAC-treatment can be according to the Israelssons principle as described below or upon the surgeon's discretion. A staged closure may start distally, proximally, or in a combination.
Postoperative course
Immediately after index operation, the surgeon fills out the baseline form containing patient characteristics and comorbidities, etiology of the peritonitis, surgical procedure, and the complexity of the condition according to Björck's classification. Patients can be transferred postoperatively to the intensive care unit (ICU) or the ward at the discretion of the treating team. Upon arrival to either the ward or the ICU, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score must be performed by the attending anesthesiologist. SOFA-scoring and routine blood samples with CRP, bilirubin, creatinine, and platelets must be performed daily within the first seven days after index operation. Discharge from the ICU will be at the discretion of the attending intensivist and surgeon.
After completion of treatment
At hospital discharge, the patients will be booked for follow-up after 12 months in the outpatient clinic for abdominal palpation and abdominal CT-scan with intravenous contrast and Valsalva maneuver. In addition, the SF-36 questionnaire will be completed at 3- and 12-months follow-up.
Power calculation
With an expected peritonitis related complications rate of 40% in the ROD group and 25% in the VAC group, the desired power of 80%, a significance level of 0.05, and an expected drop-out of 5% a total of 340 patients should be included. With this sample size a 0.32 standard deviation difference in mean CCI between the two groups could be detected with 80% as well.
To ensure sufficient recruitment, the study will be multicentre and European. Eight active centers have been included, and two are in process. Randomization tools along with eligibility criteria are accessible through our website. The workflow and relevant contact details appear on posters at the participating departments. Study progress will be available on the website.
Statistical analysis
Patient characteristics will be summarized with frequencies and proportions (for categorical variables) or with mean values ± standard deviation, median values, quartiles, and minimum and maximum values (for numerical variables). Categorical variables will be compared using a Fisher's exact test and continuous variables with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
The primary peritonitis-related complication outcome will be compared between intervention groups by chi-squared test, reported as relative risk with 95% CI. The CCI outcome will be compared by linear regression with bootstrapped standard errors reporting mean difference with 95% confidence intervals.
A superiority and a non-inferiority analysis VAC treatment against primary closure with ROD will be performed. Applying non-inferiority margin of 5% of the peritonitis related complications.
An univariate analysis will be performed on the individual complication types (abscess, leakage, etc.) and complications as a whole (peritonitis related complications and CCI). Fisher's exact or chi-square test will be used to compare the treatments depending on the number of observations.
Adjusted analysis by logistic regression will be performed for complications as a whole and for the individual complications as an outcome, where it will be adjusted for age, performance status, and comorbidity. The above analyses will also be performed as a subgroup analysis where patients with APACHE-II score\> ten will be included. This evaluates VAC and ROD in the most seriously ill part of the patient population.
The hospital health care utility and average treatment costs are compared between the treatment groups. The resource use will be reported as the mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI) compared by linear regression. In case of deviations from normality assumptions, bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions will be performed. Finally, the proportion of patients who experience radiological, acute operations will be compared by binomial regression estimating relative risk (RR) with 95% CI.
The interim analysis will be performed at 25%, 50%, and 75% of recruited patients on the primary outcome after 30-days to detect significant differences between groups at the earliest possible time, ultimately leading to the termination of the study. We have adjusted our power calculation to the interim analyses using the O'Brian-Flemming method. The study group will have access to the results of the interim analyses and may make the final decision to terminate the study.
All of the above analyses will be performed as both intention-to-treat (patients will be analyzed according to their randomization group) and per-protocol analysis (what actually happened). The main analyses will be performed as complete case analyses. Multiple imputations will impute missing values in a supplementary analysis, including baseline characteristics as predictors.
P values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Statistical calculations will be performed using Stata software (version 15, Stata Corp LP, Texas, USA).
Ethics
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and complies with current GDPR recommendations. The regional Danish Medical Ethics committee has approved the study to include patients in the acute setting with temporary consent by a surgical equipoise followed by patient information and consent after recovery. The surgical equipoise must not have any personal interest in the experiment, have experience, or have knowledge about the disease and the risks and benefits of the treatments and be indifferent to the therapeutic value of the two interventions. The rationale for choosing this inclusion model was that the subjects require immediate surgical intervention, are partly or entirely incapable of receiving and understanding the information. The severity of the condition does not allow time for third-party authorization. Both treatment regimens are accepted, safe, and widely used for this patient group. After the convalescence, patients will be informed about the project, and consent will be obtained. In instances where the patients do not survive before regaining habitual state, surrogate consent will be obtained. The patient can withdraw from the experiment at any time without having to explain him- or herself.
Patients in Denmark are covered by national insurance (Patienterstatningen), international centers will use country-specific insurance regulations. The study is investigator-initiated without economic interest to manufacturers or others involved in the investigation. No financial resources will be provided to the trial participants. Participating centers will receive the amount of 4000 Danish Krone per included patient yearly to cover the CT-scan of the abdomen and follow-up at the outpatient clinic.
The final data set will be available to the project owner and data assessor. Data can be shared in an anonymized form after an approved agreement on request. The primary investigator is responsible for data collection and handling. Unexpected adverse events must be reported to the regional committee of ethics.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vacuum assisted closure
The VAC® Abdominal Dressing System (KCI Vacuum Assisted Closure, San Antonio, TX, USA) will be used. Intestines, including lateral aspects, are covered by the visceral protective layer. The first layer of foam is placed in the laparostoma on the visceral protective layer and must extend below the fascia at a distance of 5 cm from the facial opening. Above this, a minimum of one piece of foam is folded and placed in the laparostoma. Finally, the laparostoma will be covered by the occlusive drape. A circular opening of approximately 5 cm in diameter will be created in the drape where the connection tubes to the vacuum pump will be placed. Simultaneously while applying the negative pressure of 125 mmHg, the wound edges are approximated manually towards the midline. Each dressing change must be performed in the operation theatre with the patient in general anesthesia and muscle relaxation.
Vacuum assisted closure
The Vacuum assisted closure system consists of an abdominal dressing covering the intra abdominal viscera over the dressing there will be placed a blue sponge which will be covered by drape and connected to a vacuum pump.
Relaparotomy "on-demand"
The Isreaelsson principle includes a running suture of the fascia with a distance of 5 mm between the stitches of 5 mm and the distance to the facial edge of 5-10 mm. Monofilament PDS 2-0 or equivalent is used. The suturing is started cranially and caudally, and the sutures are tied with self-locking knots. Four times as much suture material as the length of the wound must be used. The peritoneal fluid must be cultured at closure.
The treating surgeon decides to perform a ROD and should be guided by the patient's general condition, gastrointestinal function, renal function, and inflammatory parameters at daily rounds.
Relaparotomy "on demand"
Abdomen is closed at the index operation after source of peritonitis is treated. Every 48-hours the patients are evaluated for the need of relaparotomy based on clinical and paraclinical parameters.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vacuum assisted closure
The Vacuum assisted closure system consists of an abdominal dressing covering the intra abdominal viscera over the dressing there will be placed a blue sponge which will be covered by drape and connected to a vacuum pump.
Relaparotomy "on demand"
Abdomen is closed at the index operation after source of peritonitis is treated. Every 48-hours the patients are evaluated for the need of relaparotomy based on clinical and paraclinical parameters.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Diffuse peritonitis originating from a perforation on the stomach, duodenum, gallbladder, appendix, necrotizing pancreatitis, salpingitis, or peritoneal dialysis
* Primary peritonitis
* Immunocompromised (ongoing chemotherapy or prednisolone \>20 mg/day)
* Chronic parenchymal liver disease
* Pregnancy
* Patients with end-stage disease
* Laparoscopic surgery (not converted to laparotomy)
* Acute occlusion of superior mesenteric artery
* Peritoneal carcinomatosis
* Abdominal trauma
* Lack of consent from the surgical equipoise
* Local peritonitis confined to 1 quadrant only
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pooya Rajabaleyan
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Niels Qvist, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Surgical Department A, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
Uffe Tange Holst, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Surgical Department A, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
Jens Michelsen, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Anesthesiology department V, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
Palle Toft, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Anesthesiology department V, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Odense University Hospital
Odense, Fyn, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rajabaleyan P, Michelsen J, Tange Holst U, Moller S, Toft P, Luxhoi J, Buyukuslu M, Bohm AM, Borly L, Sandblom G, Kobborg M, Aagaard Poulsen K, Schou Love U, Ovesen S, Grant Solling C, Morch Sondergaard B, Lund Lomholt M, Ritz Moller D, Qvist N, Bremholm Ellebaek M; VACOR study group. Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. World J Emerg Surg. 2022 May 26;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VACOR2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.