Standardized Perioperative Management of Patients Operated With Acute Abdominal Surgery in a High-risk Emergency Setting

NCT ID: NCT03549624

Last Updated: 2022-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1435 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-26

Study Completion Date

2023-09-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the study is to handle patients with the need for an acute laparotomy according to a standardised perioperative protocol and to document the measurement as they are performed (i.e. adherence to the protocol) and to measure the outcome with regard to both short- (30 days) and long-term (3 and 12 months) mortality. Several secondary endpoints will be measured, such as: hospital stay, length of stay at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), readmission to ICU and surgical complications according to the Clavien-Dindo score. These results will then be compared to published rates of mortality from the literature and to similar outcomes for a cohort of all patients operated at NÄL on the same indication the years prior to the project/study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

200-250 acute laparotomies are performed annually at NÄL. The operations are performed for a number of reasons, where operation due to ileus; with- or without bowel strangulation; operation for acute peritonitis due to different kinds of stomach- or bowel perforation and re-operations for complications to elective surgery are the most common. A common trait for all these patients is that they are all susceptible to negative effect on organ functions on virtually all organ systems due to the underlying condition/disease for which they are being operated. This impact on organ functions include negative effects on circulation (cardiovascular system), respiration, renal function, hepatic function, coagulation and central nervous system. Sepsis is common and causes/contributes to the impaired organ functions. Multi Organ Failure (MOF) is sometimes present both pre- and postoperatively. Hence these patients are critically ill, and the outcome with regard to morbidity is severe and mortality rates are high with numbers between 14% to 90% in different populations with different age and comorbidity.

Standard care for these patients in a Swedish setting is a rapid anesthesiological assessment of the patient, preoperative resuscitation - if deemed necessary - followed by surgical intervention. Postoperative care and monitoring dependent on local facilities/routines and individual assessment of the patient and the patients postoperative needs by the surgeon and anaesthetist together.

Recent studies from the United Kingdom indicate that at more standardised protocol with emphasis on six different measures have the possibility to improve postoperative outcome with regard to short term (30 days) mortality. The measures at hand are not new nor untried but the combination of measures including the shortened time to surgery are shown to be beneficial for the patients. The measures are: 1. early so called NEWS-monitoring (measuring of standard physiological parameters); 2. Early start of antibiotics; 3. Rapid (within 6 hours) start of operation; 4. Goal-directed fluid therapy; 5. Intensified post-operative monitoring; 6. The presence of both surgical and anesthesiological specialists in the early care of the patients.

This kind of standardised perioperative protocols has not yet been implemented in Swedish health-care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparotomy Peritonitis Ileus Perforated Bowel Acute Abdomen

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

All adult (\>18y) patients with the need of an acute laparotomy (within 6 hours) at NÄL.

Patients will be treated with an perioperative regime/protocol consisting of:

1. Early so called NEWS-monitoring (measuring of standard physiological parameters);
2. Early start of antibiotics;
3. Rapid (within 6 hours) start of operation;
4. Goal-directed fluid therapy;
5. Intensified post-operative monitoring;
6. The presence of both surgical and anesthesiological specialists in the early care of the patients.

Standardised protocol for the perioperative management in patients in need of an acute laparotomy

Intervention Type OTHER

A standardised protocol for the perioperative management of patients including early start of antibiotics and swift surgical intervention as well as an emphasis on repeated monitoring of physiological parameters pre- and post-operatively.

Control group

All patients operated with an acute laparotomy at NÄL the years prior to the study will be retrospectively collected using the hospitals operation management database (Orbit©). Medical data will be collected from the patients' medical charts and outcome data (i.e. mortality, length of hospital stay, surgical complications, ICU-management etc.) will be registered

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standardised protocol for the perioperative management in patients in need of an acute laparotomy

A standardised protocol for the perioperative management of patients including early start of antibiotics and swift surgical intervention as well as an emphasis on repeated monitoring of physiological parameters pre- and post-operatively.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with the need of an acute laparotomy at NÄL

Exclusion Criteria

* Laparotomy planned in advance and without suspicion of an acute intraabdominal pathology.
* Abdominal wall hernias (with no suspicion of ileus or bowel ischemia)
* Appendectomy (Laparoskopically or open)
* Cholecystectomi (Laparoskopically or open)
* Acute thoracotomy
* Akute aortic surgery
* Planned second look-surgery (including change of open abdominal drapings/VAC)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NU-Hospital Organization, Sweden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mattias Prytz

MD, PhD. Head of Deperatment for Colorectal surgery, Department of Surgery, NU-Hospital Organization

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mattias Prytz, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sahlgrenska University Hospital an NU Hospital Oranization

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Surgery, NU-Hospital/NÄL

Trollhättan, Västra Götalandsregionen, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tengberg LT, Bay-Nielsen M, Bisgaard T, Cihoric M, Lauritsen ML, Foss NB; AHA study group. Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2017 Mar;104(4):463-471. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10427. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28112798 (View on PubMed)

Huddart S, Peden CJ, Swart M, McCormick B, Dickinson M, Mohammed MA, Quiney N; ELPQuiC Collaborator Group; ELPQuiC Collaborator Group. Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):57-66. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9658. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25384994 (View on PubMed)

Jansson Timan T, Hagberg G, Sernert N, Karlsson O, Prytz M. Mortality following emergency laparotomy: a Swedish cohort study. BMC Surg. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01319-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34380437 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Acute laparotomy NU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Peptic Ulcer Perforation Study
NCT00624169 COMPLETED NA
Damage Control Laparotomy
NCT02706041 COMPLETED NA