Meta-Analysis on Damage Control Surgery in Patients With Non-Traumatic Abdominal Emergencies

NCT ID: NCT04448912

Last Updated: 2024-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2170 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-30

Study Completion Date

2021-04-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of damage-control surgery on mortality in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. Literature search will be conducted using PubMed. Two meta-analyses will be performed comparing (1) mortality in patients with non-trauma damage control surgery vs. non-trauma conventional surgery and (2) the observed vs. expected mortality rate in patients undergoing non-trauma damage-control surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After the successful implementation in trauma patients, damage control surgery (DCS) is being increasingly used in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies, too. However, non-trauma DCS is an ongoing matter of debate as the open abdomen treatment typically performed in DCS is a non-anatomical situation and associated with potentially severe side effects. To date, DCS in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies has not yet been comprehensively assessed in meta-analysis.

A systematic literature search will be conducted using the National Library of Medicine's Medline database (PubMed). The search strategy will be based on the PICOS process. Original research articles in English language addressing (1) mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma DCS vs. non-trauma conventional surgery or (2) the observed vs. expected mortality in non-trauma DCS will be included.

Two meta-analyses will be performed, comparing (1) mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma DCS vs. non-trauma conventional surgery and (2) the observed vs. expected mortality rate in patients undergoing non-trauma DCS based on outcome prediction scores. Meta-analysis will be performed using a random-effects model. The estimated effect size for mortality will be reported as risk difference with 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivity analysis will be performed by repeating the analysis in the subgroups of studies with the same study design and studies that applied the same outcome prediction score.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Damage Control Surgery Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Non-trauma damge control surgery

Patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies undergoing damage control surgery.

Damage control surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies using the damage control approach

Non-trauma conventional surgery

Patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies undergoing conventional surgery with primary abdominal closure.

Conventional surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Damage control surgery

Surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies using the damage control approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional surgery

Conventional surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Articles on damage control surgery in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies
* Reported in-hospital or 30-day mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma damage control surgery vs non-trauma conventional surgery or
* Reported observed in-hospital or 30-day mortality vs expected mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma damage control surgery
* Articles published from 2000 to 2020
* Articles including patients older than 18 years
* Original research articles
* Articles in English language

Exclusion Criteria

* Articles describing trauma patients exclusively
* Articles describing pediatric patients (age below or equal to 18 years)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tobias Haltmeier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Inselspital, Bern University Hospial

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Haltmeier T, Falke M, Quaile O, Candinas D, Schnuriger B. Damage-control surgery in patients with nontraumatic abdominal emergencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jun 1;92(6):1075-1085. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003488. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34882591 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SRMA non-trauma DCS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Peptic Ulcer Perforation Study
NCT00624169 COMPLETED NA
A Danish Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction
NCT04750811 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING