The Visual Scanning Test: a Neuropsychological Tool to Assess Extrapersonal Visual Unilateral Spatial Neglect
NCT ID: NCT03931798
Last Updated: 2019-05-07
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
86 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2015-11-02
Study Completion Date
2018-01-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Presentation and standardization on a normative sample of a new neuropsychological tool to provide a quantitative assessment of visual unilateral spatial neglect in the extrapersonal portion of space.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Visual Functions in Patients at Risk of Developing Cerebral Visual Impairment. A Pilot Study
NCT05865093
Visual Impairment
RECRUITING
Study of Visual-spatial Attention by Eye Tracking as a Function of Central or Peripheral Visual Impairment
NCT03505398
Central or Peripheral Visual Impairment
TERMINATED
NA
Multisensory Telerehabilitation for Visual Field Defects
NCT06341777
Visual Field Defect Following Cerebrovascular Accident
Hemianopia
Brain Injuries
COMPLETED
NA
Dyslexics' Visual Attention Field
NCT03285789
Dyslexia
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Oculomotor Function Testing in Acute Concussion
NCT03892356
Concussion, Brain
UNKNOWN
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) represents one of the most frequent and disabling neuropsychological consequences of acute brain damage. Patients with USN show an impaired ability to perceive sensory events and to perform actions in the contralesional side of the space, in absence of a lower-level sensory or motor deficit. Several studies found that controlesional USN is more frequent and more severe in right than left parietal damage and due to its prominent impairment, USN has broadly been studied in the visual modality (VUSN). VUSN can affect patient's own contralesional body (personal neglect), into the near space within reaching distance (peripersonal) or space beyond reaching distance (far extrapersonal space). Those portions of space may dissociate and patient may show extrapersonal VUSN without alterations on the other portions of space (i.e. personal and peripersonal). Traditional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests are useful and widely used to evaluate VUSN, even if several of them can provide an assessment of peripersonal VUSN. In fact, this portion of space can be assessed through line bisection, cancellation, or copy tasks which are normally completed within reaching distance. Instead, personal and extrapersonal neglect are less easily evaluated: this lack of assessment tools may lead to lower detection rates for USN in patients in clinical setting and lead to relevant clinical implications. Finally, paper-and-pencil tests can detect only a moderate or even severe deficit due to VUSN but not a mild impairment and they are not informative about patients' disability in natural setting. According to this limitations of traditional paper-and-pencil tests, several studies have shown that computerized reaction time tasks are more sensitive in the detection of lateralized spatial attention deficits in patients with mild or remitted VUSN. The primary aim of this study was to present and standardize a new neuropsychological tool to provide a quantitative assessment of VUSN in the extrapersonal portion of space.
The Visual Scanning Test (VST) involved a visual search for a target between similar visual distractors, projected in the far space, so as to simulate the search within a visual field. It is overall composed by four trials, each trial contained 20 cases and made up by 20 stimuli. On about the 80% of cases, the test provided the presence of target in the left, center or in right hemispace. In the remaining 20% of cases, the test provided the presence of a catch trial (absence of the target), to assess the presence of frontal disturbances or malingering. The test is constructed according to an increasing attentional load for the target on the left-hemispace. Participants, sitting in front a blank wall, were required to actively and free explore the projected visual field to search for the visual target, naming its identification (saying YES or NO). During the task, the examiner annotated the reaction times and the errors. From these data it was possible to get some informative indexes regarding the reaction times, the accuracy and the implicit learning of the progressive shift to the left of the target and the possible presence of asymmetry in the visual exploration.
The Visual Scanning Test (VST) involved a visual search for a target between similar visual distractors, projected in the far space, so as to simulate the search within a visual field. It is overall composed by four trials, each trial contained 20 cases and made up by 20 stimuli. On about the 80% of cases, the test provided the presence of target in the left, center or in right hemispace. In the remaining 20% of cases, the test provided the presence of a catch trial (absence of the target), to assess the presence of frontal disturbances or malingering. The test is constructed according to an increasing attentional load for the target on the left-hemispace. Participants, sitting in front a blank wall, were required to actively and free explore the projected visual field to search for the visual target, naming its identification (saying YES or NO). During the task, the examiner annotated the reaction times and the errors. From these data it was possible to get some informative indexes regarding the reaction times, the accuracy and the implicit learning of the progressive shift to the left of the target and the possible presence of asymmetry in the visual exploration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Spatial Neglect
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Study Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment
Healthy participants were administered the Visual Scanning Test
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Visual Scanning Test
Intervention Type
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
The Visual Scanning Test (VST) involved a visual search for a target between similar visual distractors, projected in the far space, so as to simulate the search within a visual field. It is overall composed by four trials, each trial contained 20 cases and made up by 20 stimuli. On about the 80% of cases, the test provided the presence of target in the left, center or in right hemispace. In the remaining 20% of cases, the test provided the presence of a catch trial (absence of the target), to assess the presence of frontal disturbances or malingering. The test is constructed according to an increasing attentional load for the target on the left-hemispace. Participants, sitting in front a blank wall, were required to actively and free explore the projected visual field to search for the visual target, naming its identification (saying YES or NO). During the task, the examiner annotated the reaction times and the errors.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Visual Scanning Test
The Visual Scanning Test (VST) involved a visual search for a target between similar visual distractors, projected in the far space, so as to simulate the search within a visual field. It is overall composed by four trials, each trial contained 20 cases and made up by 20 stimuli. On about the 80% of cases, the test provided the presence of target in the left, center or in right hemispace. In the remaining 20% of cases, the test provided the presence of a catch trial (absence of the target), to assess the presence of frontal disturbances or malingering. The test is constructed according to an increasing attentional load for the target on the left-hemispace. Participants, sitting in front a blank wall, were required to actively and free explore the projected visual field to search for the visual target, naming its identification (saying YES or NO). During the task, the examiner annotated the reaction times and the errors.
Intervention Type
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
\- healthy subjects of full age.
Exclusion Criteria
* past or present neurological diseases;
* past or present psychiatric diseases;
* presence of visual disturbances.
* past or present psychiatric diseases;
* presence of visual disturbances.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rehabilitation Istitute Santa Maria Bambina
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Clinical Center Agoretis
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Francesca Cecchi
Dr
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Priftis K, Passarini L, Pilosio C, Meneghello F, Pitteri M. Visual Scanning Training, Limb Activation Treatment, and Prism Adaptation for Rehabilitating Left Neglect: Who is the Winner? Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 8;7:360. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00360. eCollection 2013.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vallar G, Calzolari E. Unilateral spatial neglect after posterior parietal damage. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;151:287-312. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63622-5.00014-0.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vallar, G., & Bolognini, N. (2014). Unilateral spatial neglect. In A. C. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of attention (pp. 972-1027). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press..
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bisiach E, Vallar G, Perani D, Papagno C, Berti A. Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(4):471-82. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90092-8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ten Brink AF, Verwer JH, Biesbroek JM, Visser-Meily JMA, Nijboer TCW. Differences between left- and right-sided neglect revisited: A large cohort study across multiple domains. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Sep;39(7):707-723. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1262333. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ten Brink AF, Biesbroek JM, Oort Q, Visser-Meily JMA, Nijboer TCW. Peripersonal and extrapersonal visuospatial neglect in different frames of reference: A brain lesion-symptom mapping study. Behav Brain Res. 2019 Jan 1;356:504-515. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis RC. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke. 1999 Jun;30(6):1196-202. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.6.1196.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Denes G, Semenza C, Stoppa E, Lis A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain. 1982 Sep;105 (Pt 3):543-52. doi: 10.1093/brain/105.3.543.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Machner B, Konemund I, von der Gablentz J, Bays PM, Sprenger A. The ipsilesional attention bias in right-hemisphere stroke patients as revealed by a realistic visual search task: Neuroanatomical correlates and functional relevance. Neuropsychology. 2018 Oct;32(7):850-865. doi: 10.1037/neu0000493.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gainotti G. The role of automatic orienting of attention towards ipsilesional stimuli in non-visual (tactile and auditory) neglect: a critical review. Cortex. 2010 Feb;46(2):150-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Appelros P, Nydevik I, Karlsson GM, Thorwalls A, Seiger A. Assessing unilateral neglect: shortcomings of standard test methods. Disabil Rehabil. 2003 May 6;25(9):473-9. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000071714.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Buxbaum LJ, Ferraro MK, Veramonti T, Farne A, Whyte J, Ladavas E, Frassinetti F, Coslett HB. Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):749-56. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000113730.73031.f4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Danckert J, Ferber S. Revisiting unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(6):987-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Berti A, Smania N, Rabuffetti M, Ferrarin M, Spinazzola L, D'Amico A, Ongaro E, Allport A. Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients. Neuropsychology. 2002 Jul;16(3):390-9. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.16.3.390.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lindell AB, Jalas MJ, Tenovuo O, Brunila T, Voeten MJ, Hamalainen H. Clinical assessment of hemispatial neglect: evaluation of different measures and dimensions. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 May;21(3):479-97. doi: 10.1080/13854040600630061.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pedroli E, Serino S, Cipresso P, Pallavicini F, Riva G. Assessment and rehabilitation of neglect using virtual reality: a systematic review. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Aug 25;9:226. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00226. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Parton A, Malhotra P, Husain M. Hemispatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;75(1):13-21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Coslett HB. Apraxia, Neglect, and Agnosia. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018 Jun;24(3, BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY):768-782. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000606.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Butler BC, Eskes GA, Vandorpe RA. Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.008.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cipresso P, Pedroli E, Serino S, Semonella M, Tuena C, Colombo D, Pallavicini F, Riva G. Assessment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect Using a Free Mobile Application for Italian Clinicians. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 22;9:2241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02241. eCollection 2018.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cocchini, G., Beschin, N., &Jehkonen, M. (2001). The Fluff Test: A simple task to assess body representation neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11(1), 17-31.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Azouvi P, Olivier S, de Montety G, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Tesio L. Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;84(1):51-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50062.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rengachary J, d'Avossa G, Sapir A, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.014.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cunningham LJ, O'Rourke K, Finlay C, Gallagher M. A preliminary investigation into the psychometric properties of the Dublin Extrapersonal Neglect Assessment (DENA): A novel screening tool for extrapersonal neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Apr;27(3):349-368. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1084334. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bonato M. Neglect and extinction depend greatly on task demands: a review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 17;6:195. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00195. eCollection 2012.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Barrett AM, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Edwards E, Heilman KM, Hillis AE, Milberg WP, Robertson IH. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for neglect and related disorders: moving from bench to bedside in stroke patients. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1223-36. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1223.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hasegawa C, Hirono N, Yamadori A. Discrepancy in unilateral spatial neglect between daily living and neuropsychological test situations: a single case study. Neurocase. 2011 Dec;17(6):518-26. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2010.547506. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bonato M, Priftis K, Marenzi R, Umilta C, Zorzi M. Deficits of contralesional awareness: a case study on what paper-and-pencil tests neglect. Neuropsychology. 2012 Jan;26(1):20-36. doi: 10.1037/a0025306. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bonato M, Deouell LY. Hemispatial neglect: computer-based testing allows more sensitive quantification of attentional disorders and recovery and might lead to better evaluation of rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 1;7:162. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00162. eCollection 2013. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Priftis K, Bonato M, Zorzi M, Umilta C. Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 5;7:25. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00025. eCollection 2013. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kerkhoff G, Schenk T. Rehabilitation of neglect: an update. Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1072-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.024. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Capitani, E. (1997). Normative data and neuropsychological assessment. Common problems in clinical practice and research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7(4), 295-310.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Capitani E, Laiacona M. Composite neuropsychological batteries and demographic correction: standardization based on equivalent scores, with a review of published data. The Italian Group for the Neuropsychological Study of Ageing. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Dec;19(6):795-809. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403761.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wilks, S. S. (1941). Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12(1), 91-96.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Capitani E, Laiacona M. Outer and inner tolerance limits: their usefulness for the construction of norms and the standardization of neuropsychological tests. Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Aug-Oct;31(6-7):1219-1230. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1334830. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bartolomeo P, Chokron S. Left unilateral neglect or right hyperattention? Neurology. 1999 Dec 10;53(9):2023-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.2023.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bartolomeo, P. (2014). The attention systems of the human brain. In Attention Disorders After Right Brain Damage (pp. 1-19). Springer, London.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bourgeois A, Chica AB, Migliaccio R, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Bartolomeo P. Cortical control of inhibition of return: evidence from patients with inferior parietal damage and visual neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):800-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ, Rafal RD. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 1984 Jul;4(7):1863-74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-07-01863.1984.
Reference Type
RESULT
Lupianez J, Klein RM, Bartolomeo P. Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct 1;23(7):1003-14. doi: 10.1080/02643290600588095.
Reference Type
RESULT
Hartmann M, Sommer NR, Diana L, Muri RM, Eberhard-Moscicka AK. Further to the right: Viewing distance modulates attentional asymmetries ('pseudoneglect') during visual exploration. Brain Cogn. 2019 Feb;129:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Reference Type
RESULT
Gamberini L, Seraglia B, Priftis K. Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.016. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
Reference Type
RESULT
Bjoertomt O, Cowey A, Walsh V. Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain. 2002 Sep;125(Pt 9):2012-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf211.
Reference Type
RESULT
Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology. 1980 Mar;30(3):327-30. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.3.327.
Reference Type
RESULT
Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Jul 29;354(1387):1325-46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0482.
Reference Type
RESULT
Borsotti M, Mosca IE, Di Lauro F, Pancani S, Bracali C, Dore T, Macchi C, Cecchi F; IRCCS Don Gnocchi Stroke Group. The Visual Scanning Test: a newly developed neuropsychological tool to assess and target rehabilitation of extrapersonal visual unilateral spatial neglect. Neurol Sci. 2020 May;41(5):1145-1152. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04218-2. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRCCSdongnocchi
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Assessment and Training Visio Spatial Neglect in a Virtual Reality Environment
NCT02258789
COMPLETED
NA
Active Cue-Training in Neglect
NCT02945592
COMPLETED
NA
Consequence of Unilateral Vestibular Loss on Visual Abilities
NCT03581331
COMPLETED
NA
Spatial Orientation and Vestibular Function
NCT02212847
COMPLETED
NA
tDCS Associated to Blindsight Rehabilitation for the Treatment of Homonymous Hemianopsia
NCT02956668
WITHDRAWN
NA
Visual Attention and Eye Movements
NCT03298737
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Evaluation of Visual Parameters by Visual Evoked Potentials Captured by EEG
NCT05675852
UNKNOWN
Musical Neglect Training for Patients With Visual Neglect
NCT03516825
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of Different Color Vision Tests in Children
NCT02464241
COMPLETED
Anodal tDCS With Compensatory Audio-visual Training for Acquired Visual Field Defects After Brain Injury
NCT06116760
COMPLETED
NA
Visual Remapping to Aid Reading With Field Loss
NCT03848663
RECRUITING
NA
Three-dimensional Virtual Reality Procedures in Vestibular Rehabilitation
NCT03553264
UNKNOWN
NA
Visual Perceptual Learning Based Digital Therapeutics for Stereopsis in Intermittent Exotropia
NCT06117813
COMPLETED
NA
An Investigation of Attentional and Inhibitory Processes During Active Visual Search in Humans
NCT06587113
COMPLETED
NA
Oscillatory Contributions to Working Memory and Attention
NCT03787134
COMPLETED
NA
Reading Problems Associated With Central Nervous System (CNS) Pathologies.
NCT04937725
COMPLETED
Verticality Perception - Effects of Prolonged Roll-tilt in Healthy Human Subjects
NCT02760173
WITHDRAWN
NA
Covert-saccades, Dynamic Visual Acuity and Quality of Life
NCT02753179
COMPLETED
NA
Restoring Neural Oscillatory Communication in Developmental Dyslexia
NCT05583136
COMPLETED
NA
Test-retest Reliability of Two Measurements of the Visual System
NCT03242421
COMPLETED
Identification of Visual Dependence in PPPD Patients With the Aid of Virtual Reality.
NCT06017908
UNKNOWN
NA
Mechanisms of Perceptual Learning
NCT06822101
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
Study of Rotatory Vestibular Tests in Major Depression Patients and Healthy Control Subjects.
NCT03421847
COMPLETED
Verticality Perception Assessed by the Haptic Vertical
NCT02980432
COMPLETED
NA
Viewing Strategy Training in Children With (Cerebral) Visual Impairment
NCT05600140
RECRUITING
NA