Assessment and Training Visio Spatial Neglect in a Virtual Reality Environment
NCT ID: NCT02258789
Last Updated: 2014-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective. To evaluate clinical and functional improvement in stroke patients with VSN, as well as before and after training with the new VR method Method:- An intense visio spatial scanning training, enhanced by directed visual, audio and tactile stimulation cues and feedback, also including visio-motor activation was designed in a VR game. The in-house developed software was based on the Tetris game. The VR method consists of an interactive 3D environment: a desktop computer, a monitor, 3D glasses and a force feedback interface. 15 patients with chronic (\>6 months) visio spatial neglect was included due to right-sided ischemia. A VR neglect test battery including a Posner task were repeated three times during a 5 weeks baseline before the training started (to establish the chronic state) and again after 15 hours training (3x1 h for 5 weeks). Evaluation of a new method for training attention after stroke causing visio spatial neglect.
The method has been designed for home rehabilitation and is well suited for a tele-medicine approach. It was built with standard components and is easy to manufacture at a low cost. The idea is to give access to effective training, to make it available at the stroke unit with the possibility for the patient to loan it it at discharge for home rehabilitation. The concept of an all in one, easy-to-use device for testing, training and outcome evaluation should be beneficial These preliminare results has been promising and indicates that the RehAtt™ method could become an further developed into an effective and stimulating intervention tool that would lower rehabilitation costs and reduce tiresome travelling to hospitals for training.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Motor Performance Improvement After Visual Rehabilitation
NCT06698172
Concurrent Vestibular Activation and Postural Training Using Virtual Reality
NCT05942781
Efficacy of Enhancing Low Vision Mobility Thru Visual Training in Virtual World
NCT02310880
Effects of Vestibular Training on Postural Control of Healthy Adults Using Virtual Reality
NCT05941039
Mixed-Reality Visual Attention Task for Neglect Diagnosis and Rehabilitation
NCT07227844
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A neglect test battery five neglect tests was repeated three times during a five week baseline to estabish a chronic state and reduce the test by test learning effect, then again after the 5 weeks training period. The main outcome results were thereafter obtained by comparing the 5 neglect tests: Star cancellation test, Baking Tray Task, Line Bisection,, Extinction and Posner task - unified index by SPSS Repeated Measurement ANOVA from the 3 baseline visits to the results after intervention. The Catherine Bergego neglect scale was used to assess activities in daily life before and after intervention as well as after six months.
Patients were included if they had a neglect that had persisted for more than six months after a right sided ishemic stroke.
Neglect was diagnosed if one or more of the four neglect subtests of the VR test battery was below cut off (See below and Appendix for details).
The exclusion criteria were severe visual impairment, severe medical illness, severe depression or cognitive dysfunction (MMSE ≤ 23 points). All patients received oral and written information with an informed and signed consent. The Umeå university ethics review board (IRB) approved the study (2010-266-31M).
The hardware consists of a standard PC, a video graphics card, a sound card, headphones and a separate numeric keyboard to measure behavioural responses. In the VR test part, we used a 19" CRT monitor and shutter glasses for stereoscopic vision. A 27" monitor and 3D vision glasses (Nvidia, Santa Clara, CA, USA) replaced them in the VR game part. A robotic pen (Phantom omni haptic device, Sensable technologies, Wilmington, USA) was used as a pointer using the right hand for assessment activities and the paretic left hand when playing the VR game for intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intervention - control
15 hours ( 3 times a week in 5 weeks) intense visio spatial scanning training Virtual Reality-method
VR-method
Neglect rehabilitation by intense scanning training and multi sensory stimuli using Virtual Reality
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VR-method
Neglect rehabilitation by intense scanning training and multi sensory stimuli using Virtual Reality
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
60 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Umeå University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Helena Fordell, MD,
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience Umea University, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience
Umeå, Umea, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UMU-2010-266-31M
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UmeaU ClinNeuro HF Neglect
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.